Some of you may want to become aware of a new rule

[jasendorf]

No but I took a look...I thought they would be going down since he's pretty preachy ...why what does this mean?

He's got 50% the amount of posts you have yet 250% your rep... sounds like a conspiracy to me.

 

[Scooter]

There have been no rep abuse issues for several days.

 

[jasendorf]

There have been no rep abuse issues for several days.

Guess they've just gotten smart about how they do it now...

 

[Annie]

Wonder if anyone's been watching actsnoblemartin's rep recently...

I like him.

 

[jasendorf]

And with your 30,000 4-word-posts you have a lot of weight to spread around.

 

[Scooter]

Guess they've just gotten smart about how they do it now...

Yeah, that's it.

Couldn't possibly be because someone's legitimately contributing well-received posts...

Nah, must be a conspiracy.

 

[jasendorf]

Yeah, that's it.

Couldn't possibly be because someone's legitimately contributing well-received posts...

Nah, must be a conspiracy.

If posts like this are "well-received" here... if it ain't a conspiracy, then it's a sad commentary on the quality of the membership I guess.

 

[Scooter]

If posts like this are "well-received" here... if it ain't a conspiracy, then it's a sad commentary on the quality of the membership I guess.

That post would be well-received by folks from one end of the political spectrum. Others might disagree with him, fine.

Rather than cry about a conspiracy, why not render him mute with a witty and emphatic retort?

That way we could all be impressed by the quality of the membership instead of bemoaning its' intellectual bankruptcy.

Just a thought.

 

[jasendorf]

I've chosen to take the "they're too dumb to even realize you've beaten them so I might as well join them" tactic. Much easier.

 

[Annie]

And with your 30,000 4-word-posts you have a lot of weight to spread around.

Boo hoo for you. Seriously, you might want to look at your attitude.

 

[maineman]

**actsnoblemartin's signature line:

Vote Democrat - It Is Easier Than Working

**red states rule's signature line:

Vote Democrat - It Is Easier Than Working


**actsnoblemartin's reputation points seem to be catapulting up the charts...by, it would seem, something like 84 point increments.

**red states rule's reputation power: 84.

[cue eerie organ music]


is all that just a coincidence?

hmmmmmmmm

 

[jasendorf]

**actsnoblemartin's signature line:

Vote Democrat - It Is Easier Than Working

**red states rule's signature line:

Vote Democrat - It Is Easier Than Working


**actsnoblemartin's reputation points seem to be catapulting up the charts...by, it would seem, something like 84 point increments.

**red states rule's reputation power: 84.

[cue eerie organ music]


is all that just a coincidence?

hmmmmmmmm

The plot thickens!!!!!

 

[Puddles]

**actsnoblemartin's signature line:

Vote Democrat - It Is Easier Than Working

**red states rule's signature line:

Vote Democrat - It Is Easier Than Working


**actsnoblemartin's reputation points seem to be catapulting up the charts...by, it would seem, something like 84 point increments.

**red states rule's reputation power: 84.

[cue eerie organ music]


is all that just a coincidence?

hmmmmmmmm

LOLOL...if that's true one would think that he would be smart enough to use a different signature...lolol

 

[Puddles]

Is that first "Noble" gives us a lecture on being nice and civil to one another, but then has a signature like this...pretty hypocritical if you ask me.

 

[Scooter]

**actsnoblemartin's signature line:

Vote Democrat - It Is Easier Than Working

**red states rule's signature line:

Vote Democrat - It Is Easier Than Working


**actsnoblemartin's reputation points seem to be catapulting up the charts...by, it would seem, something like 84 point increments.

**red states rule's reputation power: 84.

[cue eerie organ music]


is all that just a coincidence?

hmmmmmmmm

Show me that his rep is regularly rising in 84 point increments. (Hint- You can't.)

I can show you that it isn't.

Time, Date, Value of rep given to him:
02:27, 15th Mar 2007 32
13:48, 17th Mar 2007 162
16:11, 27th Mar 2007 172
16:41, 2nd Apr 2007 36
18:44, 2nd Apr 2007 177
21:00, 4th Apr 2007 83
11:29, 5th Apr 2007 -6

[Cue "The Party's Over"]

 

[jasendorf]

Show me that his rep is regularly rising in 84 point increments. (Hint- You can't.)

I can show you that it isn't.

Time, Date, Value of rep given to him:
02:27, 15th Mar 2007 32
13:48, 17th Mar 2007 162
16:11, 27th Mar 2007 172
16:41, 2nd Apr 2007 36
18:44, 2nd Apr 2007 177
21:00, 4th Apr 2007 83
11:29, 5th Apr 2007 -6

[Cue "The Party's Over"]

You see... this is how an Administration releases documents to prove that it's not lying! Good show Scooter!

 

[maineman]

Show me that his rep is regularly rising in 84 point increments. (Hint- You can't.)

I can show you that it isn't.

Time, Date, Value of rep given to him:
02:27, 15th Mar 2007 32
13:48, 17th Mar 2007 162
16:11, 27th Mar 2007 172
16:41, 2nd Apr 2007 36
18:44, 2nd Apr 2007 177
21:00, 4th Apr 2007 83
11:29, 5th Apr 2007 -6

[Cue "The Party's Over"]

if you would note, my comment was, "actsnoblemartin's reputation points seem to be catapulting up the charts...by, it would seem, something like 84 point increments"

no need to prove something I did not claim.

the exact same signature line is still creepy on its face.

[cue soft eerie organ music off in the distance]

 

[Scooter]

the exact same signature line is still creepy on its face.

And this is how I find something in your post to agree with.

 

[Scooter]

You see... this is how an Administration releases documents to prove that it's not lying! Good show Scooter!

I'm an open book to all sides. For better or worse.

Call me Ross Perot.





On second though, don't.

 

[jasendorf]

I'm an open book to all sides. For better or worse.

Call me Ross Perot.





On second though, don't.

As you wish Mr. Forbes.