So Glad That Clarence Was Brave Enough To Say What Needed To Be Said

I don't give a shit about your argument. Nobody does.

What makes something constitutional is when the SCOTUS rules that it is.

So you can hide behind this nonsense of "its MY opinion!", if you want.

But in what the rest of us call "reality", interracial marriage was not a constitutionally protected right until the SCOTUS ruled that it is.

What makes something Constitutional is it being in the Constitution.

What makes it enforceable is the SC, but they can be wrong, Plessey and Roe show that.

Was separate but equal ever really Constitutional? Or was it unconstitutional and wrongly called that by the SC at the time?
 
Stop pouting you aren't getting your way, Strict constructional federalists have been not getting our way for decades. Now things are being fixed.
Now who is distracting and flailing? You.

Yesterday, abortion up to 24 weeks was a constitutionally protected right.

Today it is not.

What changed? Not your underwear... not the zodiac sign...
 
Now who is distracting and flailing? You.

Yesterday, abortion up to 24 weeks was a constitutionally protected right.

Today it is not.

What changed? Not your underwear... not the zodiac sign...

The removal of a Opinion, Roe, which based on nothing other than the Justices desire to let abortion be legal, and some flim flam arguments tying it to due process.

Today's Opinion fixed a wrong that halted the natural progression of abortion rights via the States. Without Roe abortion would probably be legal in far more States than it will be now after Roe.
 
The removal of a Opinion, Roe, which based on nothing other than the Justices desire to let abortion be legal, and some flim flam arguments tying it to due process.

Today's Opinion fixed a wrong that halted the natural progression of abortion rights via the States. Without Roe abortion would probably be legal in far more States than it will be now after Roe.
That's nice. But your opinion means jack shit outside of your own head. Sorry.

Yesterday, abortion up to 24 weeks was a constitutionally protected right.

Today it is not.

What changed? Not your opinion...
 
They totally owned the libs when they lied under oath about Roe being settled law.....lol suckers....get over it libs


FWCkSF0UYAAfFh5.jpg


Everyone knows you are supposed to lie your way on to the Supreme Court so you can do what you have to do....this only applies to Conservatives tho....Dems should be executed for treason if they tried this
 

"In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday determined that states can restrict or outright ban abortion at any point during a pregnancy. The decision overturned Roe v. Wade, a 1973 case that established a constitutional right to abortion services. In a concurring opinion, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas indicated that the Supreme Court should reconsider previous rulings that established the right to contraception, same-sex marriage, and protections for same-sex relationship."View attachment 661730
Bout time someone finally said it......I was getting tired of cowardly conservatives being too afraid to go back after same-sex marriage and fighting back against these fags.....Lawrence V Texas needs to be struck down....that will deliver a significant blow to these trannys and fags because in the states that love Jesus -- these people can be put in prison and possibly put to death.....He almost said we should reconsider Loving v Virginia but his wife called...so he changed his mind...maybe next time, bro....but while Conservatives are riding the good news of the Roe decision, they shouldn't overlook how popular it will be to resurrect the fight against same-sex marriage and the whole groomer gay lifestyle....Campaign on it, don't be afraid....it may not have been enough of winning issue in the past, but it can be now...
Few states voted for gay marriage. That's why the left had to look to the courts to make that law.
Gay marriage needs repealed because it is immoral, and repealed it will be. Just like Roe v Wade. Just like slavery.
All immoral rulings eventually get tossed on the ash heap of history.
God kinda works it out that way. Pretty neat.
 

"In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday determined that states can restrict or outright ban abortion at any point during a pregnancy. The decision overturned Roe v. Wade, a 1973 case that established a constitutional right to abortion services. In a concurring opinion, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas indicated that the Supreme Court should reconsider previous rulings that established the right to contraception, same-sex marriage, and protections for same-sex relationship."View attachment 661730
Bout time someone finally said it......I was getting tired of cowardly conservatives being too afraid to go back after same-sex marriage and fighting back against these fags.....Lawrence V Texas needs to be struck down....that will deliver a significant blow to these trannys and fags because in the states that love Jesus -- these people can be put in prison and possibly put to death.....He almost said we should reconsider Loving v Virginia but his wife called...so he changed his mind...maybe next time, bro....but while Conservatives are riding the good news of the Roe decision, they shouldn't overlook how popular it will be to resurrect the fight against same-sex marriage and the whole groomer gay lifestyle....Campaign on it, don't be afraid....it may not have been enough of winning issue in the past, but it can be now...
Now it's time for you leftwingers to say it. You hate Clarence Thomas because he is black, and because he fled the leftwing plantation. Just admit it. Own it.
 
They totally owned the libs when they lied under oath about Roe being settled law.....lol suckers....get over it libs


View attachment 661819

Everyone knows you are supposed to lie your way on to the Supreme Court so you can do what you have to do....this only applies to Conservatives tho....Dems should be executed for treason if they tried this
I fail to see any lies whatsoever.
1. Alito. An important precedent doesn't mean it's a good precedent.
2. Gorsuch. Roe was the law of the land, and he accepted it while it was law, but that mean it was a good law or that it shouldn't have been overturned.
3. Kavanaugh Yes, it was a precedent. Bad precedents shouldn't stand.
4. All Amy did was describe what Roe said. So what?

You leftwingers don't seem to understand what constitutes a lie.
 
So you are not sure why Conservatives have been trying to ban contraceptives for decades?

Or are you pretending to not know why


The answer is very easy......it's a good way to keep your fundamentalist Christofacist base in line....
It is a Catholic Church thing isn't it?

By the way I do not like the Catholic Church at all though they've been useful allies in the fight against abortion.
 
I fail to see any lies whatsoever.
Right, because you are both exactly the rube to which they pander, while also in on the con yourself.

You knew they would overturn it, and you knew they wouldn't say so in their hearings. That's the lie you applaud, right now.

It's just another example of you religious nutters employing the Jihad Rule.
 
It is a Catholic Church thing isn't it?

By the way I do not like the Catholic Church at all though they've been useful allies in the fight against abortion.

No Catholics don't want to ban birth control. The just don't want their parishoners to use it. The rabid right wing evangelicals are pushing to ban birth control to end premarital sex.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
No Catholics don't want to ban birth control. The just don't want their parishoners to use it.

What's the difference.? Once my wife was in a Catholic hospital (despite not being a Catholic) and they wouldn't provide her with her birth control pills..
 

"In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday determined that states can restrict or outright ban abortion at any point during a pregnancy. The decision overturned Roe v. Wade, a 1973 case that established a constitutional right to abortion services. In a concurring opinion, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas indicated that the Supreme Court should reconsider previous rulings that established the right to contraception, same-sex marriage, and protections for same-sex relationship."View attachment 661730
Bout time someone finally said it......I was getting tired of cowardly conservatives being too afraid to go back after same-sex marriage and fighting back against these fags.....Lawrence V Texas needs to be struck down....that will deliver a significant blow to these trannys and fags because in the states that love Jesus -- these people can be put in prison and possibly put to death.....He almost said we should reconsider Loving v Virginia but his wife called...so he changed his mind...maybe next time, bro....but while Conservatives are riding the good news of the Roe decision, they shouldn't overlook how popular it will be to resurrect the fight against same-sex marriage and the whole groomer gay lifestyle....Campaign on it, don't be afraid....it may not have been enough of winning issue in the past, but it can be now...
You're good Biff. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 

"In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday determined that states can restrict or outright ban abortion at any point during a pregnancy. The decision overturned Roe v. Wade, a 1973 case that established a constitutional right to abortion services. In a concurring opinion, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas indicated that the Supreme Court should reconsider previous rulings that established the right to contraception, same-sex marriage, and protections for same-sex relationship."View attachment 661730
Bout time someone finally said it......I was getting tired of cowardly conservatives being too afraid to go back after same-sex marriage and fighting back against these fags.....Lawrence V Texas needs to be struck down....that will deliver a significant blow to these trannys and fags because in the states that love Jesus -- these people can be put in prison and possibly put to death.....He almost said we should reconsider Loving v Virginia but his wife called...so he changed his mind...maybe next time, bro....but while Conservatives are riding the good news of the Roe decision, they shouldn't overlook how popular it will be to resurrect the fight against same-sex marriage and the whole groomer gay lifestyle....Campaign on it, don't be afraid....it may not have been enough of winning issue in the past, but it can be now...
hhhbnjjnnjjjnnnmj.jpeg
 

"In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday determined that states can restrict or outright ban abortion at any point during a pregnancy. The decision overturned Roe v. Wade, a 1973 case that established a constitutional right to abortion services. In a concurring opinion, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas indicated that the Supreme Court should reconsider previous rulings that established the right to contraception, same-sex marriage, and protections for same-sex relationship."View attachment 661730
Bout time someone finally said it......I was getting tired of cowardly conservatives being too afraid to go back after same-sex marriage and fighting back against these fags.....Lawrence V Texas needs to be struck down....that will deliver a significant blow to these trannys and fags because in the states that love Jesus -- these people can be put in prison and possibly put to death.....He almost said we should reconsider Loving v Virginia but his wife called...so he changed his mind...maybe next time, bro....but while Conservatives are riding the good news of the Roe decision, they shouldn't overlook how popular it will be to resurrect the fight against same-sex marriage and the whole groomer gay lifestyle....Campaign on it, don't be afraid....it may not have been enough of winning issue in the past, but it can be now...
There's no right to kill your baby, ghoul.
 

Forum List

Back
Top