So A Gay New Term It Really Is(?)! And In All Of History(?)!

[mascale]

So now that it is, like, so lame(?), as in gay, to not respect one another(?)--regardless of how or what they love(?)--has something terrible now just happened in an innaugural address? "Stupid," for example: Could easily be associated with the innaugural address, delivered by a Harvard Law School, former professor(?)! He is even doing something, that most people will never do(?)! That is like. . . .so. . . .Stupid!

How ?Gay? Came to Mean ?Homosexual?

Gay has not always been about same-sex, and in fact is mostly associated with felicity and spritely--and not necessarily fairy--decor, and even famously, clothing.

Now one particular meaning has entered into the history-books, where maybe it would have been best to have left it out(?). "Gay" has been recently emerging into another concept, even again. In an innaugural event, history will now be all about sex(?), instead!

And I myself am a liberal(?)! In fact, I myself am even liberal about it. In fact. . .it would be so gay. . .not to be a liberal. . . .especially about sex(?)!

Somehow, "Stupid," seems to resonate about the usual liberal appeal to rights without a material well-being concept. Things are not fine. The Make Work Pay Equal Amount Refundable Income Tax Credit was taken away. The Payroll Tax Holiday was taken away. At one point in history, even lots of personal property was taken away(?)! There is a certain lack of sanctity happening--in really all kinds of concepts, in America!

Maybe too much plastic-values liberal: Is not such a good idea to memorialize in an innaugural address. Some would call it lame. Others now have to call it sex--even though regular coitus is not specifically addressed, in the matter.

The low income market just got hit with a giant tax increase, now really not needed, and right now a bad idea. Anyone would say that there is mainly something "gay" about the entire new course of the Incoming New Term.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(To be absolutely gay about it, All of France was at once time thought to be a lot like that, what with a bunch of masked guys running around, doing things likely thought gay even then(?)!)

 

[jwoodie]

How about "intolerant" (of bad behavior) and "discriminating" (taste)? The liberal media has turned the English language on its head in order to manipulate public opinion.

 

[mascale]

"Limosine Liberals," easily and variously able to be called "gay," fail even to notice that the heightened need for security--and saids systems--is not evidence of just how successful their various "Civil Rights" movements have been.

The fellow in this thing is one of them from Hawaii--who sends his own kids to Sidwell Friends to avoid the Washington, D. C. public schools--and the people who attend them. Those are the offspring of the adults who created the hapless little spawn in the first place--as though everyone would liver happily, ever-after.

The Obamamobile: New presidential limo is unveiled - and it can withstand rocket and chemical attacks | Mail Online

The very vehicle thought to be evidence of success--is better said a symbol of failure. There is no concept, even in the inventing of it, that everything on the plan is going well.
"Holy Myopia, BlackPrez!" no one guffaws as any motorcarde passes on! That vehicle is meant to survive a major attack--from other living humans on the very same planet.

Anyone has to think of a fictional leisure class! First the Republicans took the slaves away, and then the Democrats came on board. Then the Republicans took away the Make Work Pay Refundable Credit. The Liberal Democrats then came on Board. Then Both the Republicans and the Liberal Democrats agreed to take away the Payroll Tax Holiday. So just what is a rich family supposed to do(?). . .No one asks!! The people cannot be asked to labor as slaves. The people are not allowed to have more spending money!

That is. . . .So Very. . . . .Stupid! There are White People who can appreciate the problem. Going back generations. . .there have long been White People, able to appreciate the problem!

Now the liberals have set about celebrating gay behavior(?)--a legal matter. Now gay behavior is being elevated to a policy matter. All Civil Liberties should now be viewed in that context. The emphasis on "equal" and "rights" is a scam. No such intent is meant, and in the policy. There is now a new and better way to view and undertand it!

In policy, even the concept of the more money was taken away, and in just the short space of only four years.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Curious how so many old ways are not forgotten--mostly among liberals, being civil, and celebrating liberation(?)! Rich people getting away with it again, now in the context of "Gay" things, not just "Colored" things. Little kids probably can discuss, away from the schools(?)!)

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Good Lord

 

[g5000]

How about "intolerant" (of bad behavior) and "discriminating" (taste)? The liberal media has turned the English language on its head in order to manipulate public opinion.

Here's a word you should look up: equivocation, because you are doing it now.

 

[mascale]

The blatant intolerance, bigotry, and insensitivity which characterizes all persons at all in support of the Ivy League is not best discussed in "equivocal" terms. . .but maybe in more Jew-Baiting Terms. Jews are disproportionately represented there. The Lesser, More "Schvartz(?)" Ivy League is only barely less blantant, and probably just as latent about it.

The second mascalian post directly links the concept, "Same-Sex-Partner Rights," with the usual oppression of the propaganda-based, liberal agenda. Anyone can smirk that now everyone can blame it all on them. Liberals can easily be like that. Anyone notes the "liberal diversity agenda" now represented in the Obama Cabinet at this time.

Many can be reminded, in fact, of a Lincoln-era cabinet(?). The president had jailed the opposition, shuttered the opposition press, suspended Habeus Corpus, only freed the slaves of the South, Constitutionally obligated to the north. Loyalty Oaths were required of the clergy. Nearly 700,000 While People were killed, more than a million physically and mentally decimated. Clearly, the liberals needed some way to build a statue, and probably at no small expense.

Much is said of how properous became the post-WWII United States. Much was then said how mostly blacks were not a part of the prosperity. The only good Indian had long since become a dead Indian. This could be seen on TV. An "Equivocation" was more like making a federal calendar holiday of a dubious theologian, who was Protestant--instead of a dubious theologian, who was Cathholic or Moslem. Mainly, other nations do that, thought enemies of the United States: With which the Liberals like to compare and contrast the United States(?)!

People in Hawaii, in fact, do have television--even now. It comes from the sky, they are probably told(?). . .or outer space(?). . . .or someplace(?)!

Now, if it is thought that the liberals are well-educated, and smart--and able to understand arithmetic--then anyone can get more mascalian about them, and claim that they intneded the shown outcome. In fact, that outcome they clearly intend and do every day, and engage in extensive propaganda to get everyone else to go along with it.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Still need to question need for 2nd Amendment, clearly intended to set about the decimation of the Indigenous Tribe(?): Clearly an intended outcome, known at the outset--or guessed at the outset--even if Lewis and Clark had to wander aimless about the Lands of Many Nations, yet unknown(?)!)