Smith trying to get Trump convicted before election, says Attorney Jonathan Turley

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It didn't stop him or his momentum in fact it helped him..

A sad commentary on his nauseating cult....

 

[Rambunctious]

As if you know anything about that trial. Come on.

I watched the news as it happened... it was Kavanaugh part 2....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I watched the news as it happened... it was Kavanaugh part 2....

No it wasn't. Lots of compelimg testimony. The Kavanaugh hearings and investigation were whitewashed and squashed.

 

[Rambunctious]

A sad commentary on his nauseating cult....

A sad commentary on our corrupt judicial system... our courtrooms have become a disgrace.... Judges should run for their seat not be appointed by the likes of Joe Biden or Obama...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

A sad commentary on our corrupt judicial system... our courtrooms have become a disgrace.... Judges should run for their seat not be appointed by the likes of Joe Biden or Obama...

More baseless claims you cannot argue...

 

[Rambunctious]

No it wasn't. Lots of compelimg testimony. The Kavanaugh hearings and investigation were whitewashed and squashed.

Compelling testimony?... from an event that supposedly happened 30 years ago with no witnesses or evidence...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Compelling testimony?... from an event that supposedly happened 30 years ago with no witnesses or evidence...

Yes it was. You know nothing about. Also held up on appeal.

 

[Libby von H]

Supreme Court: Trump must respond to special counsel’s presidential immunity petition before Christmas

The Supreme Court has agreed to expedite this appeal and asked Trump’s lawyers to respond to the motion by next Wednesday December 20

www.foxnews.com

This blows me away

But why should it? I should be used to the childish, un-American, demonic, anti-Christ BS of the left.


from site

If the justices get involved, they would have an opportunity to rule for the first time on whether ex-presidents enjoy immunity from prosecution. Justice Department policy prohibits the indictment of a sitting president.

Elsewhere from site:

Trump lawyers, meanwhile, have said he cannot be charged for actions that fell within his official duties as president — a claim that prosecutors have vigorously rejected.

Comment:

It says "Trump cannot be charged for actions that fell within his official duties as president."

isn't it part of a president's duties to uphold the Constitution?

Election laws were violated in the last election, laws written in the US Constitution which states that the state legislators have control over election places, times and procedures. Yet, last time, governors and others usurped the state legislatures.

The stupidest thing about that strategy is that every vote he does get is from WE THE PEOPLE and no law stands about WE THE PEOPLE according to the Constitution., It is like jury nullification which maybe I've mentioned to you before but you don't know what it is

And I am not a Trumper,just someone that hates ignorant people posing as intelligent.

 

[Rambunctious]

More baseless claims you cannot argue...

We watched it... how would you like it if some chick with a grudge accused you of rape with zero evidence from 30 years ago... and some biased jury convicted you?...
Its wrong and I've never seen anything like this before Trump won...

 

[Rambunctious]

Yes it was. You know nothing about. Also held up on appeal.

then tell us what the compelling evidence was....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The stupidest thing about that strategy is that every vote he does get is from WE THE PEOPLE and no law stands about WE THE PEOPLE according to the Constitution., It is like jury nullification which maybe I've mentioned to you before but you don't know what it is

And I am not a Trumper,just someone that hates ignorant people posing as intelligent.

View attachment 873623

You don't get to vote on whether or not Trump is a felon. Sorry.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We watched it... how would you like it if some chick with a grudge accused you of rape with zero evidence from 30 years ago... and some biased jury convicted you?...
Its wrong and I've never seen anything like this before Trump won...

No arguments, there. Just baseless claims reserved for the orange god.

 

[Nostra]

Yes it was. You know nothing about. Also held up on appeal.

Show us the evidence you reference.

This will be fun.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Show us the evidence you reference.

This will be fun.

Your mommy doesn't work here. Go read up. Start with my posts, since you already mangled them.

 

[Nostra]

Your mommy doesn't work here. Go read up. Start with my posts, since you already mangled them.

So you are full of shit.

That was fun.

 

[rampart]

Wow. You should really do at least a tiny bit of homework on presidential immunity before posting in this thread.

no, because by the time your crazy supremes are done with this case trump will be immune from venereal disease.

 

[Rawley]

no, because by the time your crazy supremes are done with this case trump will be immune from venereal disease.

Seems to be the story your masters are feeding you.

 

[rampart]

Seems to be the story your masters are feeding you.

another idiot. ignore.

 

[Rawley]

another idiot. ignore.

Please do. Reading your rank ignorance literally hurts.

 

[Rawley]

I think it is in the public interest that Donald's trials be resolved before the election, so that the American people can make an informed decision, and one that isn't tainted by an ongoing criminal procedure.

Really? So you would vote for Trump if he's acquitted?