Should Welfare Recipients Be Allowed To Vote?

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Publius1787, Jan 13, 2011.

?

Should Welfare Recipients Be Allowed To Vote?

  1. No

    28.6%
  2. Yes

    69.0%
  3. Unsure

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Other

    2.4%
  1. Publius1787
    Offline

    Publius1787 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,211
    Thanks Received:
    668
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,398
    A Conflict of Interest?

    Acting under the assumption that taxation without representation is wrong, isn’t representation without taxation wrong as well? In a time when 47% of households pay absolutely no tax at all, can we justify those who do not pay taxes to be able to vote on how much the taxpaying citizen’s pay for the services of government that we all benefit from? ( http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/business/economy/14leonhardt.html ) Furthermore, aren’t those who receive government assistance in a conflict of interest if they are able to vote for whatever politician is willing to increase the amount of their federally/state funded checks? Also, for the purpose of this thread, let’s throw in businesses and corporations that receive funds/subsidies/assistance/bailouts from the government. Should they be able to donate money in the name of their business or run campaign ads? Since both people and business owners who receive welfare/money/assistance from the federal government have a vested interest in voting for politicians, who redistribute money, and thus redistribute liberty, from the taxpayer to those who don’t pay taxes or businesses that get assistance/bailouts, shouldn’t they lose the privilege to vote or the liberty to donate money and speak on that politicians behalf? Can’t the taxpayer be compensated for his loss of liberty by also taking away the privilege to vote from the welfare recipiant or the right of a business that receives bailouts/subsidies to donate money or run ads?

    Well I think it’s perfectly fine to deny the vote to those who are dependent on the government. I think that James Madison and the rest of the founding fathers were right on two counts when they debated whether “freeholders” (property owners), should be the only ones to vote. For one, allowing the dependent to vote will create a false corrupt constituency of those who are voting property away from one class of citizens and giving non-existent liberties and privileges to themselves. Second, it creates a class of politician who achieves power by corrupting his own constituency. In other words, they will not vote on the guy who is best able to determine the functions of government in accordance to his constituency to defend everyone’s unalienable rights, but vote on the guy that promises more assistance, thus taking rights from one and giving government sponsored extra privileges to another. Thus, running for political office would be less of the former in order to see who can out do his competition in the latter. It makes perfect since to deny the privilege of suffrage to those who are dependent on the American taxpayer. The ballot box should not be used as a tool to steal the property of others. In fact, if it was anyone other than the government, they would be thrown in jail!

    I know there will be some of you who claim that we all pay sales and numerous other taxes, however, I find this dishonest as the majority of people who pay no taxes at all receive more back in the form of a tax rebate/tax credits than they pay in sales taxes and others.

    Some will also say "what about federal employees?" Thats a fair enough question. To that I say that the average federal employee shouldent get any higher pay than the average American working citizen.

    -Benjamin Franklin- "When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic"

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOZ-Etb0k0Q[/ame]

    Back in the 2008 election, a woman by the name of Peggy Joseph became a YouTube sensation when she commented on the newly elected President Obama by saying, “I won’t have to worry about putting gas in my car. I won’t have to worry about paying my mortgage. You know. If I help him he’s gonna help me.” Likewise, in the economically destroyed city of Detroit, people were standing in line to apply for $3,000 each in stimulus money to help pay for their mortgages. Ken Rogulski of WJR News was on scene. The Transcript goes as follows:

    Rogulski: Why are you here?
    Woman #1: To get some money.
    Rogulski: What kind of money?
    Woman #1: Obama money.
    Rogulski: Where's it coming from?
    Woman #1: Obama.
    Rogulski: And where did Obama get it?
    Woman #1: I don't know, his stash. I don't know. (laughter) I don't know where he got it from. But, he givin' it to us. To help us.
    Woman #2: And we love him.
    Woman #1: We love him. That's why we voted for him!
    Women: (chanting) Obama! Obama! Obama! (laughing)


    ............................................................. The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Wealth Creators vs Wealth Spreaders
    .....................................................................[​IMG]






    Before comenting on the constitutionality of it all understand that the constitution only says that the vote cannot be denied on the ACCOUNT of race or sex. It says nothing about dependency!
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2011
  2. Madeline
    Offline

    Madeline BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    18,505
    Thanks Received:
    1,624
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Cleveland. Feel mah pain.
    Ratings:
    +1,624
    What a great idea!

    Mebbe we can bring back poll taxes while we're at it?

    *Sarcastic tone*
     
  3. MarcATL
    Offline

    MarcATL Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    15,350
    Thanks Received:
    2,358
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,747
    What does the Constitution say about who can and cannot vote?
     
  4. Madeline
    Offline

    Madeline BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    18,505
    Thanks Received:
    1,624
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Cleveland. Feel mah pain.
    Ratings:
    +1,624
    You are so nit-picky.

    LOL.
     
  5. Publius1787
    Offline

    Publius1787 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,211
    Thanks Received:
    668
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,398
    Its up to the states. Voting is a privilage, not a right.
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2011
  6. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,650
    Just fyi..right now the feds REQUIRE that welfare workers offer to register applicants to vote. It is OUR responsibility to offer it to them, to get it stamped and mailed, to keep a record, AND to provide registration apps in our lobbies.
     
  7. IHBF
    Offline

    IHBF BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    883
    Thanks Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +154
    Fuck no.
     
  8. HUGGY
    Offline

    HUGGY I Post Because I Care Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    33,727
    Thanks Received:
    3,805
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Seattle, in a run down motel
    Ratings:
    +6,285
    Why fuck around? You guys that haven't made your first million.. Fuck off you don't count..in fact the only American that should vote is Bill Gates. He is the winner... He was the lucky and smart one. Nobody else is shit. Ya that's the ticket. Bill Gets to chose. Everybody else just shut the fuck up!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  9. MarcATL
    Offline

    MarcATL Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    15,350
    Thanks Received:
    2,358
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,747
    "It's up to the States" huh?

    So what's wrong with what they have now?

    Don't we already have too much restrictions on who can vote as it stands?

    If I'm not mistaken, The Constitution states that any CITIZEN can vote.

    Right now there are things a CITIZEN can do or fail to do that will PREVENT them from voting.

    So there seems to be already too much government getting in the way RESTRICTING the FREEDOMS of CITIZENS.

    And here it seems the OP is wanting MORE GOVERNMENT RESTRICTION.

    WoW!!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Publius1787
    Offline

    Publius1787 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,211
    Thanks Received:
    668
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,398
    Qute response but no analysis? No debate? Nothing I said up there seems wrong to you? Other than the obvious fact that you disagree with me? You can use sarcasm all you want and I cerainly did not advocate for poll taxes but you have contributed nothing to this thread or why you oppose my position.
     

Share This Page