Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your opinion is noted, but it's bullshit... Americans are overwhelmingly against the ACA...Some thoughts on this issue:
Too many people fail to understand that the Supreme Court is a political institution and a body of individuals who understand their place in history.
If the Court strikes down the Affordable Health care act and that decision is 5-4 it will forever stain the reputation of Chief Justice Roberts.
Again, your opinion is noted, but bullshit... Already explained how smaller bills could speed through the system...If the Court strikes down the Affordable Health care act it will take a generation or more for another bill to make it through the Congress and to the desk of the POTUS.
Currently, we the taxpayers, are providing health care for the uninsured. Such care is provided by public/county hospitals and emergency rooms in private for profit and non profit hospitals.
Protecting the right of the uninsured as a property interest denies those who pay taxes - local, state, federal - and purchase health care insurance of our property interest (we are forced to pay higher taxes and insurance (rates and co-pay) to subsidize the freeloaders.
then tell us why all other countries who have a single payer system have better care that is cheaper than ours?
Government Obstruction and Mismanagement, here.
Some thoughts on this issue:
Too many people fail to understand that the Supreme Court is a political institution and a body of individuals who understand their place in history.
If the Court strikes down the Affordable Health care act and that decision is 5-4 it will forever stain the reputation of Chief Justice Roberts.
If the Court strikes down the Affordable Health care act it will take a generation or more for another bill to make it through the Congress and to the desk of the POTUS.
Currently, we the taxpayers, are providing health care for the uninsured. Such care is provided by public/county hospitals and emergency rooms in private for profit and non profit hospitals.
Protecting the right of the uninsured as a property interest denies those who pay taxes - local, state, federal - and purchase health care insurance of our property interest (we are forced to pay higher taxes and insurance (rates and co-pay) to subsidize the freeloaders.
You meant to say if they uphold the Affordable Health Care Act in a 5-4 decision it will forever stain the reputation of Chief Justice Roberts and forever give the government the authority to tell private citizens they must buy products from private companies for the greater good.
Some thoughts on this issue:
Too many people fail to understand that the Supreme Court is a political institution and a body of individuals who understand their place in history.
If the Court strikes down the Affordable Health care act and that decision is 5-4 it will forever stain the reputation of Chief Justice Roberts.
If the Court strikes down the Affordable Health care act it will take a generation or more for another bill to make it through the Congress and to the desk of the POTUS.
Currently, we the taxpayers, are providing health care for the uninsured. Such care is provided by public/county hospitals and emergency rooms in private for profit and non profit hospitals.
Protecting the right of the uninsured as a property interest denies those who pay taxes - local, state, federal - and purchase health care insurance of our property interest (we are forced to pay higher taxes and insurance (rates and co-pay) to subsidize the freeloaders.
I doubt the word "easily" would be used to describe any bill passed where new monies would be spent.If struck down in it's entirety, do you think congress would do anything at all to replace it? Not a chance in hell, we get to wait another ten or twenty years for something that should have been done twenty years ago.
You're right about that. Costs aren't going down. So persons that would have gotten their preventative medical care done will now wait until they self-present to the emergency room. What would have been handled by drug therapy for pennies will now be handled by procedures that costs dollars; hundreds of them.
Again, smaller bills with the stuff that nobody was arguing over could easily be passed... Unless, of course, the out of power democratics spend time whining and being sore losers...
Still, the mandate is unconstitutional as far as I can tell.
I'm really amused at the theory that all of the good ideas in the world were contained in our Constitution and anything suggested is prohibited (or may as well be) since it wasn't installed in 1787.
I'm amused that you people seem to forget there's an amendment process to alter the Constitution...
In this climate, two people from different sides of the aisle can't agree if it's partly cloudy or partly sunny; yeah...I'm so sure that we'll be able to amend the Constitution in this climate. You can blame both sides for the atmosphere of course but you can't deny that it exists.
In this climate, two people from different sides of the aisle can't agree if it's partly cloudy or partly sunny; yeah...I'm so sure that we'll be able to amend the Constitution in this climate. You can blame both sides for the atmosphere of course but you can't deny that it exists.
Proving you are wrong as usual.
Ron Wyden and Paul Ryan's Bipartisan Plan for Health Care and Medicare Reform - Forbes
The GOP is going to win a huge victory when the Court tosses O-care. Why would we whine about that??
In this climate, two people from different sides of the aisle can't agree if it's partly cloudy or partly sunny; yeah...I'm so sure that we'll be able to amend the Constitution in this climate. You can blame both sides for the atmosphere of course but you can't deny that it exists.
Proving you are wrong as usual.
Ron Wyden and Paul Ryan's Bipartisan Plan for Health Care and Medicare Reform - Forbes
The GOP is going to win a huge victory when the Court tosses O-care. Why would we whine about that??
In this climate, two people from different sides of the aisle can't agree if it's partly cloudy or partly sunny; yeah...I'm so sure that we'll be able to amend the Constitution in this climate. You can blame both sides for the atmosphere of course but you can't deny that it exists.
Proving you are wrong as usual.
Ron Wyden and Paul Ryan's Bipartisan Plan for Health Care and Medicare Reform - Forbes
The GOP is going to win a huge victory when the Court tosses O-care. Why would we whine about that??
Funny (even for you).
A bill is a bill until it is voted on by both houses then conferees work out the differences then it is signed into law or vetoed. For an academic argument, it's fine. In the real world, to quote House, it's bullshit.
I'm sure you'll find something to bellyache about as long as Obama is in the White House. You always do.
Perry.
Proving you are wrong as usual.
Ron Wyden and Paul Ryan's Bipartisan Plan for Health Care and Medicare Reform - Forbes
The GOP is going to win a huge victory when the Court tosses O-care. Why would we whine about that??
Funny (even for you).
A bill is a bill until it is voted on by both houses then conferees work out the differences then it is signed into law or vetoed. For an academic argument, it's fine. In the real world, to quote House, it's bullshit.
I'm sure you'll find something to bellyache about as long as Obama is in the White House. You always do.
Perry.
You find it funny to have your ass handed to you for making stupid unsupportable statements? You said that two members could never agree across the aisle. That is clearly untrue. There is actually a lot of willingness to work across the aisle. Just not from the radical wing of the Dums, which includes the WH.
Americans are overwhelmingly against the ACA.
Making taxpayers subsidize the uninsured as exists today is okay because?Your opinion is noted, but it's bullshit... Americans are overwhelmingly against the ACA...Some thoughts on this issue:
Too many people fail to understand that the Supreme Court is a political institution and a body of individuals who understand their place in history.
If the Court strikes down the Affordable Health care act and that decision is 5-4 it will forever stain the reputation of Chief Justice Roberts.
You're response isn't related to my opinions, and there is no evidence offered to conclude, "Americans are overwhelmingly against the ACA".
Again, your opinion is noted, but bullshit... Already explained how smaller bills could speed through the system...If the Court strikes down the Affordable Health care act it will take a generation or more for another bill to make it through the Congress and to the desk of the POTUS.
History suggests my opinion is spot on; have you not noticed, the Congress is broken, and bills smaller or otherwise are dead on arrival.
Currently, we the taxpayers, are providing health care for the uninsured. Such care is provided by public/county hospitals and emergency rooms in private for profit and non profit hospitals.
Protecting the right of the uninsured as a property interest denies those who pay taxes - local, state, federal - and purchase health care insurance of our property interest (we are forced to pay higher taxes and insurance (rates and co-pay) to subsidize the freeloaders.
Nobody said the system wasn't broken... What they said was forcing Americans to purchase health insurance or else face penalties is unconstitutional... They said that a 2700+ page of beaurocratic bullshit that we cannot afford is not the answer...
Not all the provisions acceptable to both sides involve monies spent... Parental coverage up to 26, pre-existing conditions...I doubt the word "easily" would be used to describe any bill passed where new monies would be spent.You're right about that. Costs aren't going down. So persons that would have gotten their preventative medical care done will now wait until they self-present to the emergency room. What would have been handled by drug therapy for pennies will now be handled by procedures that costs dollars; hundreds of them.
Again, smaller bills with the stuff that nobody was arguing over could easily be passed... Unless, of course, the out of power democratics spend time whining and being sore losers...
That's because you're half-blind...From the looks of the board, the republicans seem to be the ones whining and being sore losers.
I didn't say it was likely... The amendment process exists and is THE ONLY method for altering the Constitution...Still, the mandate is unconstitutional as far as I can tell.
I'm really amused at the theory that all of the good ideas in the world were contained in our Constitution and anything suggested is prohibited (or may as well be) since it wasn't installed in 1787.
I'm amused that you people seem to forget there's an amendment process to alter the Constitution...
It's a non-starter of an argument. In this climate, two people from different sides of the aisle can't agree if it's partly cloudy or partly sunny; yeah...I'm so sure that we'll be able to amend the Constitution in this climate. You can blame both sides for the atmosphere of course but you can't deny that it exists.
Not all the provisions acceptable to both sides involve monies spent... Parental coverage up to 26, pre-existing conditions...I doubt the word "easily" would be used to describe any bill passed where new monies would be spent.Again, smaller bills with the stuff that nobody was arguing over could easily be passed... Unless, of course, the out of power democratics spend time whining and being sore losers...
That's because you're half-blind...
I didn't say it was likely... The amendment process exists and is THE ONLY method for altering the Constitution...I'm amused that you people seem to forget there's an amendment process to alter the Constitution...
It's a non-starter of an argument. In this climate, two people from different sides of the aisle can't agree if it's partly cloudy or partly sunny; yeah...I'm so sure that we'll be able to amend the Constitution in this climate. You can blame both sides for the atmosphere of course but you can't deny that it exists.
There are idiots who believe it can be altered through interpretation, though... That IS amusing...
Making taxpayers subsidize the uninsured as exists today is okay because?Your opinion is noted, but it's bullshit... Americans are overwhelmingly against the ACA...Some thoughts on this issue:
Too many people fail to understand that the Supreme Court is a political institution and a body of individuals who understand their place in history.
If the Court strikes down the Affordable Health care act and that decision is 5-4 it will forever stain the reputation of Chief Justice Roberts.
You're response isn't related to my opinions, and there is no evidence offered to conclude, "Americans are overwhelmingly against the ACA".
Again, your opinion is noted, but bullshit... Already explained how smaller bills could speed through the system...
History suggests my opinion is spot on; have you not noticed, the Congress is broken, and bills smaller or otherwise are dead on arrival.
Currently, we the taxpayers, are providing health care for the uninsured. Such care is provided by public/county hospitals and emergency rooms in private for profit and non profit hospitals.
Protecting the right of the uninsured as a property interest denies those who pay taxes - local, state, federal - and purchase health care insurance of our property interest (we are forced to pay higher taxes and insurance (rates and co-pay) to subsidize the freeloaders.
Nobody said the system wasn't broken... What they said was forcing Americans to purchase health insurance or else face penalties is unconstitutional... They said that a 2700+ page of beaurocratic bullshit that we cannot afford is not the answer...
Suggesting you have any ideas on what is Constitutional and what is not is with all honesty laughable. I've read (too) many of your posts most of which are snarky one-liners. Again, with all honesty, you're not very bright but exceptionally opinionated.
So as I was saying, the way it was written--way back before we had street lights--is the basis for all government action. Its amusing that there are still some who think the country is better off not adjusting to the realities of the current world.
Some thoughts on this issue:
Too many people fail to understand that the Supreme Court is a political institution and a body of individuals who understand their place in history.
If the Court strikes down the Affordable Health care act and that decision is 5-4 it will forever stain the reputation of Chief Justice Roberts.
If the Court strikes down the Affordable Health care act it will take a generation or more for another bill to make it through the Congress and to the desk of the POTUS.
Currently, we the taxpayers, are providing health care for the uninsured. Such care is provided by public/county hospitals and emergency rooms in private for profit and non profit hospitals.
Protecting the right of the uninsured as a property interest denies those who pay taxes - local, state, federal - and purchase health care insurance of our property interest (we are forced to pay higher taxes and insurance (rates and co-pay) to subsidize the freeloaders.
You meant to say if they uphold the Affordable Health Care Act in a 5-4 decision it will forever stain the reputation of Chief Justice Roberts and forever give the government the authority to tell private citizens they must buy products from private companies for the greater good.
If I meant to say that, I would have said so. What I did suggest, is that the property interest which has created so much hysteria cuts both ways.
Everyone who gets sick or injured will get treatment; those of us who pay taxes and purchase health insurance subsidize those who do not.
Not all the provisions acceptable to both sides involve monies spent... Parental coverage up to 26, pre-existing conditions...I doubt the word "easily" would be used to describe any bill passed where new monies would be spent.
That's because you're half-blind...
I didn't say it was likely... The amendment process exists and is THE ONLY method for altering the Constitution...It's a non-starter of an argument. In this climate, two people from different sides of the aisle can't agree if it's partly cloudy or partly sunny; yeah...I'm so sure that we'll be able to amend the Constitution in this climate. You can blame both sides for the atmosphere of course but you can't deny that it exists.
There are idiots who believe it can be altered through interpretation, though... That IS amusing...
So as I was saying, the way it was written--way back before we had street lights--is the basis for all government action. Its amusing that there are still some who think the country is better off not adjusting to the realities of the current world.
