Publius1787
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2011
- 6,211
- 676
- 190
Should People Be Forced To Join A Union And Pay Dues As A Condition Of Their Right To Work?
.
.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Absolutely not!Should People Be Forced To Join A Union And Pay Dues As A Condition Of Their Right To Work?
.
Should People Be Forced To Join A Union And Pay Dues As A Condition Of Their Right To Work?
.
Should People Be Forced To Join A Union And Pay Dues As A Condition Of Their Right To Work?
.
No
What you describe is more commonly called extortion.
no they shouldn't , which is why I am glad to live in a right to work state.
Should People Be Forced To Join A Union And Pay Dues As A Condition Of Their Right To Work?
.
Should People Be Forced To Join A Union And Pay Dues As A Condition Of Their Right To Work?
.
I have no problem with people not being forced to join unions and pay dues...but they should also not reap the benefits of when unions negotiate new contracts and/or raises.
A so, when did you stop beating your wife? thread.
I'm being forced to seek permission from the ingroup in order to work and to document my acceptance. Hell, both even give me a card to prove my status as a member of the ingroup who's permitted to sell my labour power in accordance with the rules set forth by the collective.So I shouldn't need to get 'legal' status and pay taxes to work?
Filling out your 1099 and paying your income taxes is NOT joining a union. Good grief.
Statistically, union members get paid more than non-union labor in the same field - and that difference is significantly more than what they pay in union dues.
Why should someone get paid more than others in his field if he doesn't pay dues to the organization that got him those better wages?
I'm being forced to seek permission from the ingroup in order to work and to document my acceptance. Hell, both even give me a card to prove my status as a member of the ingroup who's permitted to sell my labour power in accordance with the rules set forth by the collective.
The only difference is one of scale.
Statistically, union members get paid more than non-union labor in the same field - and that difference is significantly more than what they pay in union dues.
Why should someone get paid more than others in his field if he doesn't pay dues to the organization that got him those better wages?
I'm saying you have no principles.I'm being forced to seek permission from the ingroup in order to work and to document my acceptance. Hell, both even give me a card to prove my status as a member of the ingroup who's permitted to sell my labour power in accordance with the rules set forth by the collective.
The only difference is one of scale.
By the "ingroup" I assume you mean the union. Who is "both groups?" However, I don't see the point of your post. Are you making excuses for compulsory union membership?