Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
Voting is a fundamental right, period. Try having better ideas instead of taking away fundamental rights.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Voting is a fundamental right, period. Try having better ideas instead of taking away fundamental rights.
Voting is a fundamental right, period. Try having better ideas instead of taking away fundamental rights.
You sound like a second amendment supporter.
So are you "conservatives" who endorse this idea also supporting an increase in taxes as well in order to get more people eligible to vote?
Problem is that with our current tax code, it's difficult to tell who is actually paying taxes and who isn't. And which taxes are we talking about? Income taxes? State taxes?
I've always said that if "No taxation without representation" is true, that "No representation without taxation" would likewise be true. Mainly because the two are intimately connected.
However, the solution to remedy that is not denying people the right to vote, but rather requiring everyone to pay taxes.
Fucking moron.Should only taxpayers be allowed to vote?
The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.
So are you "conservatives" who endorse this idea also supporting an increase in taxes as well in order to get more people eligible to vote?
Fucking moron.Should only taxpayers be allowed to vote?
The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.
How about entrepreneur/investors during their first year (or maybe two) starting up their company? It's quite common for them not to make any money.
Should they not be allowed to vote?
Perhaps the OP should read some of the history behind the 24th. Its not like the People came up with that one just because why not.Fucking moron.Should only taxpayers be allowed to vote?
The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.
How is that an appropriate response to asking a question? Great. Cite the current law. That's fine. It doesn't answer the question of whether it should be the current law of the land, which is what he is asking. How is anyone a moron for asking questions?
Perhaps the OP should read some of the history behind the 24th. Its not like the People came up with that one just because why not.Fucking moron.
How is that an appropriate response to asking a question? Great. Cite the current law. That's fine. It doesn't answer the question of whether it should be the current law of the land, which is what he is asking. How is anyone a moron for asking questions?
Stay at home moms claimed as dependents on their husband's taxes would lose their right to vote.
Conservative family values.
Stay at home moms claimed as dependents on their husband's taxes would lose their right to vote.
Conservative family values.
Its a stupid idea. NO we don't want to go back to a POLL TAX. Maybe while we're at it, we'll repeal the 19th? For fucks sake no I'm not interested in going BACKWARDS.Perhaps the OP should read some of the history behind the 24th. Its not like the People came up with that one just because why not.How is that an appropriate response to asking a question? Great. Cite the current law. That's fine. It doesn't answer the question of whether it should be the current law of the land, which is what he is asking. How is anyone a moron for asking questions?
Im very familiar with it. Perhaps you should try participating in a discussion. Maybe even arguing for an issue with facts instead of trying to insult people just because the questions they ask threaten your frail paradigm.
Unfortunately, you, like countless others, are trapped in this mindset that there is no need to ask questions that make us think. Being forced to think about things we dont necessary agree with isn't a bad thing. In fact, it helps us learn how to argue our points better and determine what we actually do think and believe. By not challenging yourself you aren't open to growing.
As much as I don't care for GIM's ideas most of the time, he, at least, isn't afraid to ask questions or make himself or others think.
Stay at home moms claimed as dependents on their husband's taxes would lose their right to vote.
Conservative family values.
Not actually true. As long as they file jointly, the income of both husband and wife are the same. There is no issue there unless you try to fabricate one. Perhaps you might want to try a better argument.