Sexual Revolution .. results

[editec]

I was a hostage to the sexual revolution.

And then I developed Stockholm Syndrome.

 

[jillian]

I thought everything was open for review and discussion

i suppose you can.

but why would you?

should we review segregation?

oh right... i forgot...

hell Jillian-----we still review shit from centuries ago.

you cut off the rest of my post.

IF we're going to review science, shouldn't we look to legitimate sources and not a bunch of people with a religious agenda?

 

[Ringel05]

i suppose you can.

but why would you?

should we review segregation?

oh right... i forgot...

hell Jillian-----we still review shit from centuries ago.

you cut off the rest of my post.

IF we're going to review science, shouldn't we look to legitimate sources and not a bunch of people with a religious agenda?

Or a bunch of people with a funding agenda..... Not to mention other personal or social agendas.

 

[dilloduck]

i suppose you can.

but why would you?

should we review segregation?

oh right... i forgot...

hell Jillian-----we still review shit from centuries ago.

you cut off the rest of my post.

IF we're going to review science, shouldn't we look to legitimate sources and not a bunch of people with a religious agenda?

because the OP was about a religious group revisting science ? I think you can drop your armor--no one is after you or yours.

 

[Lumpy 1]

(Obsessed with the idea of making women go back to the 1950's.)

mmm .. ah... nope.. the cats are out of that bag..

Also .. I not getting why you're taking this as a personal attack.. I'm merely presenting a subject for review and discussion..

well, i see a lot of reactionaries trying to turn back the clock on a lot of issues.

this is a subject for review and discussion? why?

i don't see it as a personal attack at all. i see it as silliness.

i don't like disinformation.

But Sweetie Pie.. I seem to have popped your cork on this subject and you have something to say about it.. enjoy the discussion no matter the OP. You can thank me at your convenience..

 

[jillian]

(Obsessed with the idea of making women go back to the 1950's.)

mmm .. ah... nope.. the cats are out of that bag..

Also .. I not getting why you're taking this as a personal attack.. I'm merely presenting a subject for review and discussion..

well, i see a lot of reactionaries trying to turn back the clock on a lot of issues.

this is a subject for review and discussion? why?

i don't see it as a personal attack at all. i see it as silliness.

i don't like disinformation.

But Sweetie Pie.. I seem to have popped your cork on this subject and you have something to say about it.. enjoy the discussion no matter the OP. You can thank me at your convenience..

you haven't popped my cork at all hon. i merely commented.

i think it made pixie cranky, though. it's ok...she's still good peeps.

 

[PixieStix]

which has what to do with the absurdity of the article.?

what kind of 'sexual devients'?

who cares what tripp purportedly said... he worked for kinsey for 10 years so clearly wasn't troubled by anything.

wasn't he the guy who said lincoln was gay?

oh and he graduated with a degree in BIOLOGY and PSYCHOLOGY.

where are you getting that he was a 'zoologist'?

He was a zoologist
All his biographies state such

That is what I mean, people make assumptions based on hollywood and it's portrayal of it's heroes. A sad commentary, if people actually thought for themselves and researched who actually did our research that molded our society, they would be shocked, or maybe just call me a liar and a bigot, or a woman hater

Kinsey is a hero of the left, when in fact he was a pedophile.

no. they don't. his degree was in biology and psychology. he did some etymological research. and all his bios do not say otherwise... or it would have been contained in the legitimate sources.

kinsey was convicted of pedophilia? really?

he isn't a 'hero' of anyone. i really don't like when people make up things like that.... like if you don't agree with some hack who's done nothing but trash the admin since the election, then obama is your 'hero'. that's simply silly.

as for the hollywood thing...irrelevant to the point i raised.

if you want science, look to scientists. not religious activists. that isn't their thing.

btw, still waiting for those 'devients'. what kind?

What kind of men were they, this Kinsey team? The question remains: Who did these experiments? As noted, the Kinsey team reported on a cadre of "trained observers." In Kinsey's own words...

Better data came from adult males who have had sexual contacts with younger boys and who, with their adult backgrounds, are able to recognize and interpret the boys' experiences. Unfortunately ....[only] 9 of our adult male subjects have observed such orgasm. Some of these adults are technically trained persons who have kept diaries or other records which have been put at our disposal....on 317 pre-adolescents who were either observed in self- masturbation or....with other boys or older adults.[28]​

This stuff makes me sick. It makes me sick because our so called sexual revolution is based on alfred kinsey and his so called scientific research

 

[Samson]

I do have to wonder, though, why you're obsessed with the idea of making women go back to the 1950's.

Perhaps he feels society hasn't been entirely blessed with changes in women's social roles during the past 60 years!!!!!!

I know, crazy talk.

 

[Lumpy 1]

hell Jillian-----we still review shit from centuries ago.

you cut off the rest of my post.

IF we're going to review science, shouldn't we look to legitimate sources and not a bunch of people with a religious agenda?

Or a bunch of people with a funding agenda..... Not to mention other personal or social agendas.

Hint .. I'm trying to extract my butt from the ringer.. you're not helping much...in fact.. the exact opposite..

 

[HUGGY]

He was a zoologist
All his biographies state such

That is what I mean, people make assumptions based on hollywood and it's portrayal of it's heroes. A sad commentary, if people actually thought for themselves and researched who actually did our research that molded our society, they would be shocked, or maybe just call me a liar and a bigot, or a woman hater

Kinsey is a hero of the left, when in fact he was a pedophile.

no. they don't. his degree was in biology and psychology. he did some etymological research. and all his bios do not say otherwise... or it would have been contained in the legitimate sources.

kinsey was convicted of pedophilia? really?

he isn't a 'hero' of anyone. i really don't like when people make up things like that.... like if you don't agree with some hack who's done nothing but trash the admin since the election, then obama is your 'hero'. that's simply silly.

as for the hollywood thing...irrelevant to the point i raised.

if you want science, look to scientists. not religious activists. that isn't their thing.

btw, still waiting for those 'devients'. what kind?

What kind of men were they, this Kinsey team? The question remains: Who did these experiments? As noted, the Kinsey team reported on a cadre of "trained observers." In Kinsey's own words...

Better data came from adult males who have had sexual contacts with younger boys and who, with their adult backgrounds, are able to recognize and interpret the boys' experiences. Unfortunately ....[only] 9 of our adult male subjects have observed such orgasm. Some of these adults are technically trained persons who have kept diaries or other records which have been put at our disposal....on 317 pre-adolescents who were either observed in self- masturbation or....with other boys or older adults.[28]​

This stuff makes me sick. It makes me sick because our so called sexual revolution is based on alfred kinsey and his so called scientific research

That's crazy talk Miss Stix! I never read any Kinzy and have never had a conversation with my 1000 plus gal pals regarding Kinzy. We just did what came naturaly. If you need a "report" to authorise your sexuality then you have issues.

Just sayin...

 

[dilloduck]

no. they don't. his degree was in biology and psychology. he did some etymological research. and all his bios do not say otherwise... or it would have been contained in the legitimate sources.

kinsey was convicted of pedophilia? really?

he isn't a 'hero' of anyone. i really don't like when people make up things like that.... like if you don't agree with some hack who's done nothing but trash the admin since the election, then obama is your 'hero'. that's simply silly.

as for the hollywood thing...irrelevant to the point i raised.

if you want science, look to scientists. not religious activists. that isn't their thing.

btw, still waiting for those 'devients'. what kind?

What kind of men were they, this Kinsey team? The question remains: Who did these experiments? As noted, the Kinsey team reported on a cadre of "trained observers." In Kinsey's own words...

Better data came from adult males who have had sexual contacts with younger boys and who, with their adult backgrounds, are able to recognize and interpret the boys' experiences. Unfortunately ....[only] 9 of our adult male subjects have observed such orgasm. Some of these adults are technically trained persons who have kept diaries or other records which have been put at our disposal....on 317 pre-adolescents who were either observed in self- masturbation or....with other boys or older adults.[28]​

This stuff makes me sick. It makes me sick because our so called sexual revolution is based on alfred kinsey and his so called scientific research

That's crazy talk Miss Stix! I never read any Kinzy and have never had a conversation with my 1000 plus gal pals regarding Kinzy. We just did what came naturaly. If you need a "report" to authorise your sexuality then you have issues.

Just sayin...

Agreed--I think women who wanted to fuck a lot just got to be re-labled from sluts to progressive.

 

[syrenn]

Granted this is a dated article but considering the constant commercials about sexual dysfunction and hang ups, I'm thinking the sexual revolution yielded kinda lousy results. On the other hand.. those, "Free Love" days were kinda fun...

----------------------------------

An article from an organization whose intent it is to bring 'biblial principals' into government.

thanks...

but no thanks.

the article was ridiculous in 1999 when it was written.

I do have to wonder, though, why you're obsessed with the idea of making women go back to the 1950's.

from their website:

We are the nation's largest public policy women's organization with a rich 30-year history of helping our members across the country bring Biblical principles into all levels of public policy.

You beat me to it! lol

 

[dilloduck]

Granted this is a dated article but considering the constant commercials about sexual dysfunction and hang ups, I'm thinking the sexual revolution yielded kinda lousy results. On the other hand.. those, "Free Love" days were kinda fun...

----------------------------------

An article from an organization whose intent it is to bring 'biblial principals' into government.

thanks...

but no thanks.

the article was ridiculous in 1999 when it was written.

I do have to wonder, though, why you're obsessed with the idea of making women go back to the 1950's.

from their website:

We are the nation's largest public policy women's organization with a rich 30-year history of helping our members across the country bring Biblical principles into all levels of public policy.

You beat me to it! lol

Holy Mackeral, ladies---no one is suggesting that you have to wear bras again.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Granted this is a dated article but considering the constant commercials about sexual dysfunction and hang ups, I'm thinking the sexual revolution yielded kinda lousy results. On the other hand.. those, "Free Love" days were kinda fun...

----------------------------------

An article from an organization whose intent it is to bring 'biblial principals' into government.

thanks...

but no thanks.

the article was ridiculous in 1999 when it was written.

I do have to wonder, though, why you're obsessed with the idea of making women go back to the 1950's.

from their website:

We are the nation's largest public policy women's organization with a rich 30-year history of helping our members across the country bring Biblical principles into all levels of public policy.

You beat me to it! lol

Gads they just turn on you.. just like that.....mmm......I wonder

 

[syrenn]

Granted this is a dated article but considering the constant commercials about sexual dysfunction and hang ups, I'm thinking the sexual revolution yielded kinda lousy results. On the other hand.. those, "Free Love" days were kinda fun...

----------------------------------

From television to the Internet and magazines to textbooks, every aspect of sex and sexuality has been dissected. Alfred Kinsey and his fraudulent sex ”research“ permanently altered society's approach to sex. ”Free love“ may have seemed liberating in the '60s, but it has inhibited society with rampant STDs and AIDS and, frankly, too much information.

Recently, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a study by University of Chicago sociologist Edward Laumann. Laumann found that more than 40% of women and 30% of men suffer some sort of sexual dysfunction (USA Today, 2/9/99). Researchers call this study the most comprehensive since the 1948 Kinsey Report. However, Kinsey's research methods involving sexual deviants have been deemed unscientific and inaccurate. Hence, such a comparison is not flattering.

Concerned Women for America - The Results of the Sexual Revolution

Concerned women for America???

I love this snip from the first line.

Alfred Kinsey and his fraudulent sex ”research“

An Article that is talking about MALE impotence? Sounds to me like the poor man is suffering from performance anxiety and is trying to rationalize his limp dick problem and inability to use his hands head and tongue.

 

[dilloduck]

An article from an organization whose intent it is to bring 'biblial principals' into government.

thanks...

but no thanks.

the article was ridiculous in 1999 when it was written.

I do have to wonder, though, why you're obsessed with the idea of making women go back to the 1950's.

from their website:

You beat me to it! lol

Gads they just turn on you.. just like that.....mmm......I wonder

Don't even HINT at denying thier right to fuck like men.

 

[Samson]

An article from an organization whose intent it is to bring 'biblial principals' into government.

thanks...

but no thanks.

the article was ridiculous in 1999 when it was written.

I do have to wonder, though, why you're obsessed with the idea of making women go back to the 1950's.

from their website:

You beat me to it! lol

Holy Mackeral, ladies---no one is suggesting that you have to wear bras again.

Yeah, and for godsake, don't stop working outside the home.....we need the money..

 

[dilloduck]

Granted this is a dated article but considering the constant commercials about sexual dysfunction and hang ups, I'm thinking the sexual revolution yielded kinda lousy results. On the other hand.. those, "Free Love" days were kinda fun...

----------------------------------

From television to the Internet and magazines to textbooks, every aspect of sex and sexuality has been dissected. Alfred Kinsey and his fraudulent sex ”research“ permanently altered society's approach to sex. ”Free love“ may have seemed liberating in the '60s, but it has inhibited society with rampant STDs and AIDS and, frankly, too much information.

Recently, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a study by University of Chicago sociologist Edward Laumann. Laumann found that more than 40% of women and 30% of men suffer some sort of sexual dysfunction (USA Today, 2/9/99). Researchers call this study the most comprehensive since the 1948 Kinsey Report. However, Kinsey's research methods involving sexual deviants have been deemed unscientific and inaccurate. Hence, such a comparison is not flattering.

Concerned Women for America - The Results of the Sexual Revolution

Concerned women for America???

I love this snip from the first line.

Alfred Kinsey and his fraudulent sex ”research“

An Article that is talking about MALE impotence? Sounds to me like the poor man is suffering from performance anxiety and is trying to rationalize his limp dick problem and inability to use his hands head and tongue.

40% of women ----catch that part ?

 

[PixieStix]

One of the results of the sexual revolution may be that I am expected to be more than I actually am?

If I tried to live up to that, wouldn't that would make me a liar and a fake?

While I appreciate being allowed to vote and work and make my own decisions. I do not appreciate men being chastised for being men (protectors), nor do I like the fact that women are chastised for being naturally (nurturing).

 

[syrenn]

Yeah and i am sure you men would love to go back to where women don't like having sex, or dont know how to have sex

I am sure men would love to go back to a time when women weren't better at sex them men.....or knew they could LAST longer then men.