Sexual Abuse in Islam

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by Sky Dancer, Jun 30, 2010.

  1. Sky Dancer
    Offline

    Sky Dancer BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    19,307
    Thanks Received:
    1,158
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1,164
    Let me begin with a quote from a fatwa by the late and unlamented Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran.

    "A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man's four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl's sister."
    Islam Watch - "Sexual Perversion in Islam"

    This is worse than what the Catholic Church has done. The RCC does not issue fatwa's encourging child abuse.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2010
  2. Newby
    Offline

    Newby Does it get any better? Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    9,094
    Thanks Received:
    1,577
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,703
    Touche Sky. :lol:
     
  3. Sky Dancer
    Offline

    Sky Dancer BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    19,307
    Thanks Received:
    1,158
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1,164
    "A man can have sex with sheep, cows and camels and so on. However, he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village; however, selling the meat to the next door village should be fine." Don't the buyers deserve a discount of some kind?

    Khomeini's "Tahrirolvasyleh" fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990
     
  4. Kalam
    Offline

    Kalam Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    8,866
    Thanks Received:
    773
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +773
    1. Khomeini was a Shi'ite heretic.

    2. Tahrir al-Wasilah doesn't have a fourth volume and this passage can't be found anywhere other than on anti-Islamic propaganda websites.

    The punishment for bestiality is death.

    Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet said, "If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him." I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas), "What offence can be attributed to the animal?" He replied, "I think he disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it." - Sunan Abu Dawud, Prescribed Punishments, no. 4449​
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2010
  5. The Infidel
    Offline

    The Infidel EVIL CONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    17,252
    Thanks Received:
    3,170
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    AMERITOPIA
    Ratings:
    +3,173


    :lol:


    Kalam -- Islam is a whacked religion.... and you know it.

    Whats with all the honor killings? I guess that is just Zionist propaganda too
    :cuckoo:
     
  6. Kalam
    Offline

    Kalam Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    8,866
    Thanks Received:
    773
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +773
    Nobody said anything about "Zionist propaganda" before you got here, whoever you are...

    "Honor killing" has no basis in scripture and is more prevalent among Hindus than Muslims. If you're curious, look up the number of Muslim women killed in these types of incidents and compare it to the number of Hindu women killed in "bride burnings" or "dowry killings."
     
  7. manu1959
    Offline

    manu1959 Left Coast Isolationist

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2004
    Messages:
    13,761
    Thanks Received:
    1,625
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    california
    Ratings:
    +1,626
    ahhhh....the hindus are worse than us argument....guess it makes it ok then....
     
  8. Kalam
    Offline

    Kalam Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    8,866
    Thanks Received:
    773
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +773
    That's not what I was saying. If people really care about "honor killing" victims, where is the outrage over Hindu bride burnings? The answer is that they don't care; they feign concern about Muslim victims because all they're worried about is making Islam look bad.
     
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2010
  9. Kalam
    Offline

    Kalam Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    8,866
    Thanks Received:
    773
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +773
    If that were true, people would be able to criticize it without using obvious forgeries and other dishonest tactics. Anybody who cared enough to confirm these claims before posting them could easily have found out that they were false; people don't care because they're single-mindedly devoted to denigrating Islam. Unbelievers have a tendency to regard the truth with aversion because they're afraid of it.
     
  10. Tech_Esq
    Offline

    Tech_Esq Sic Semper Tyrannis!

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Messages:
    4,408
    Thanks Received:
    558
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Ratings:
    +558
    If a Hindu shows up, we'll be sure to mention that's a wacked religion too. (Like they don't know that whole caste system thing isn't really working for them). But we'll mention it just for you.

    Meanwhile, back to you. So, honor killings? Just some....not so bad....Any is an outrage fella!

    As long as we're on the subject where are the Muslims trying to take back their religion from the lunatics? Why are they not in the street marching every day? Why do they not attack the heretics (which folks like al Quaeda are always called. (Just before we get the "peaceful religion" soft soap). You know 10 years ago I believed that, but with 10 years of no evidence, the burden of proof is now on the Muslims to show me why they should be considered peaceful and innocent.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page