Senator Marco Rubio: It's Constitutionally Valid To Refuse Services To Gay Marriages (He's Right)

Ya gotta love it when Obama supporters start talking about people not being presidential material... priceless.
 
So it would be okay if I refused to serve religious people? At my bakery??

You would have the right to not make a religious product for them.
For example - a cake shaped like a bible with the word written on top of it.
You don't have the right to put a sign in the window that says no religious people allowed.
 
So it would be okay if I refused to serve religious people? At my bakery??

You would have the right to not make a religious product for them.
For example - a cake shaped like a bible with the word written on top of it.
You don't have the right to put a sign in the window that says no religious people allowed.
But I simply don't want them coming through my door....
 
So it would be okay if I refused to serve religious people? At my bakery??

You would have the right to not make a religious product for them.
For example - a cake shaped like a bible with the word written on top of it.
You don't have the right to put a sign in the window that says no religious people allowed.
But I simply don't want them coming through my door....
Then you're shit outta luck.
 
Just think, Jewish delicatessens are not obligated to serve ham sandwiches. Halal restaurants are not obligated to serve pork chops. Is that unconstitutional?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think newspapers have the right to refuse any ad that they please.

I have to agree that Marco Rubio, a non-natural born Citizen constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of the presidency, who will announce his candidacy on April 11th, is right on this issue.

Rubio Constitutionally Valid For People to Refuse Service to Gay
Marriages - Breitbart

You're understanding of what he actually said is severely flawed, as is your understanding of his status as a natural born citizen. But, as I said in a another thread, you just can't fix stupid.


No you can't. We have some loonies here on the Left, but you have more than your share on the right. Enjoy Steve McFuckMeInTheAss, he is really quite entertaining.

If you really want to know what side is the better side to be on in a debate, just make sure you are NOT on his side, then you will have better chances, statistically speaking.

The loonies are not in short supply on either side. I do admit with a good deal of frustration that my party has been courting them more than the Democrats have. But, not being a Democrat, I really don't pay too much attention and I might be wrong on that.
 
So it would be okay if I refused to serve religious people? At my bakery??

You would have the right to not make a religious product for them.
For example - a cake shaped like a bible with the word written on top of it.
You don't have the right to put a sign in the window that says no religious people allowed.
But I simply don't want them coming through my door....

That is discrimination, same as any baker who would say no gays allowed which they are not doing.
 
Just think, Jewish delicatessens are not obligated to serve ham sandwiches. Halal restaurants are not obligated to serve pork chops. Is that unconstitutional?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think newspapers have the right to refuse any ad that they please.

I have to agree that Marco Rubio, a non-natural born Citizen constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of the presidency, who will announce his candidacy on April 11th, is right on this issue.

Rubio Constitutionally Valid For People to Refuse Service to Gay
Marriages - Breitbart

You're understanding of what he actually said is severely flawed, as is your understanding of his status as a natural born citizen. But, as I said in a another thread, you just can't fix stupid.


No you can't. We have some loonies here on the Left, but you have more than your share on the right. Enjoy Steve McFuckMeInTheAss, he is really quite entertaining.

If you really want to know what side is the better side to be on in a debate, just make sure you are NOT on his side, then you will have better chances, statistically speaking.

The loonies are not in short supply on either side. I do admit with a good deal of frustration that my party has been courting them more than the Democrats have. But, not being a Democrat, I really don't pay too much attention and I might be wrong on that.


Everyone has a looney moment now and then, if you ask me. The problem is with those who have them as a chronic condition....
 
Just think, Jewish delicatessens are not obligated to serve ham sandwiches. Halal restaurants are not obligated to serve pork chops. Is that unconstitutional?

:lmao:

So, you think that not selling a product in the first place is the equivalent of not selling a product that you do sell to a particular person because that person is gay/black/female/Republican/HIV positive/Christian, etc?

Oh Steve, you're always good for a laugh. Not much else, but at least you're good for a laugh.
 
Just think, Jewish delicatessens are not obligated to serve ham sandwiches. Halal restaurants are not obligated to serve pork chops. Is that unconstitutional?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think newspapers have the right to refuse any ad that they please.

I have to agree that Marco Rubio, a non-natural born Citizen constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of the presidency, who will announce his candidacy on April 11th, is right on this issue.

Rubio Constitutionally Valid For People to Refuse Service to Gay Marriages - Breitbart
I'm pretty sure if wedding cake sellers don't sell wedding they go out of business
Just think, Jewish delicatessens are not obligated to serve ham sandwiches. Halal restaurants are not obligated to serve pork chops. Is that unconstitutional?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think newspapers have the right to refuse any ad that they please.

I have to agree that Marco Rubio, a non-natural born Citizen constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of the presidency, who will announce his candidacy on April 11th, is right on this issue.

Rubio Constitutionally Valid For People to Refuse Service to Gay Marriages - Breitbart
A deli that serves ham but only to gentiles is breaking the law.
 
Just think, Jewish delicatessens are not obligated to serve ham sandwiches. Halal restaurants are not obligated to serve pork chops. Is that unconstitutional?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think newspapers have the right to refuse any ad that they please.

I have to agree that Marco Rubio, a non-natural born Citizen constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of the presidency, who will announce his candidacy on April 11th, is right on this issue.

Rubio Constitutionally Valid For People to Refuse Service to Gay Marriages - Breitbart
Rubio was born in Miami. Last I checked that's still the U.S. And that makes him a citizen, naturally born.
No he isn't. His parents were not naturalized citizens when he was born in 1971. They became naturalized U.S. citizens AFTER his birth in 1975 meaning Rubio was born to aliens.
 
Just think, Jewish delicatessens are not obligated to serve ham sandwiches. Halal restaurants are not obligated to serve pork chops. Is that unconstitutional?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think newspapers have the right to refuse any ad that they please.

I have to agree that Marco Rubio, a non-natural born Citizen constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of the presidency, who will announce his candidacy on April 11th, is right on this issue.

Rubio Constitutionally Valid For People to Refuse Service to Gay Marriages - Breitbart
Rubio was born in Miami. Last I checked that's still the U.S. And that makes him a citizen, naturally born.
No he isn't. His parents were not naturalized citizens before he was born in 1971. They became naturalized U.S. citizens AFTER in 1975 meaning Rubio was born to aliens.

So you have no idea what you are talking about. I'm glad you have clarified that - again.
 
Just think, Jewish delicatessens are not obligated to serve ham sandwiches. Halal restaurants are not obligated to serve pork chops. Is that unconstitutional?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think newspapers have the right to refuse any ad that they please.

I have to agree that Marco Rubio, a non-natural born Citizen constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of the presidency, who will announce his candidacy on April 11th, is right on this issue.

Rubio Constitutionally Valid For People to Refuse Service to Gay Marriages - Breitbart
Jewish delis don't serve ham to ANYONE. Halal restaurants don't serve pork chops to ANYONE.
Minus religious freedom laws, could not a Jewish deli that does catering be forced to cater a KKK event? How about a Black Southern Baptist owned restaurant?
 
Just think, Jewish delicatessens are not obligated to serve ham sandwiches. Halal restaurants are not obligated to serve pork chops. Is that unconstitutional?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think newspapers have the right to refuse any ad that they please.

I have to agree that Marco Rubio, a non-natural born Citizen constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of the presidency, who will announce his candidacy on April 11th, is right on this issue.

Rubio Constitutionally Valid For People to Refuse Service to Gay Marriages - Breitbart
Rubio was born in Miami. Last I checked that's still the U.S. And that makes him a citizen, naturally born.
No he isn't. His parents were not naturalized citizens before he was born in 1971. They became naturalized U.S. citizens AFTER in 1975 meaning Rubio was born to aliens.

So you have no idea what you are talking about. I'm glad you have clarified that - again.
I know EXACTLY what I am talking about.
 
Just think, Jewish delicatessens are not obligated to serve ham sandwiches. Halal restaurants are not obligated to serve pork chops. Is that unconstitutional?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think newspapers have the right to refuse any ad that they please.

I have to agree that Marco Rubio, a non-natural born Citizen constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of the presidency, who will announce his candidacy on April 11th, is right on this issue.

Rubio Constitutionally Valid For People to Refuse Service to Gay
Marriages - Breitbart

You're understanding of what he actually said is severely flawed, as is your understanding of his status as a natural born citizen. But, as I said in a another thread, you just can't fix stupid.


No you can't. We have some loonies here on the Left, but you have more than your share on the right. Enjoy Steve McFuckMeInTheAss, he is really quite entertaining.

If you really want to know what side is the better side to be on in a debate, just make sure you are NOT on his side, then you will have better chances, statistically speaking.

The loonies are not in short supply on either side. I do admit with a good deal of frustration that my party has been courting them more than the Democrats have. But, not being a Democrat, I really don't pay too much attention and I might be wrong on that.


Everyone has a looney moment now and then, if you ask me. The problem is with those who have them as a chronic condition....

That is the nature of a bell curve. Those ends will always be there no matter what you do. We will always have the stupid with us. The real issue is to what extent they are allowed to skew the curve.
 

Forum List

Back
Top