Sen Schumer needs to be put under oath to explain this meeting with Putin

[usmbguest5318]

Why is it so hard for people to see that the issue is not merely that people met with or talked to Putin or any other Russian, but rather that they did and when asked about it, they deny having done so, and that behavior in turn calls into question what transpired during the interactions such that denying they happened was considered necessary, especially, but not solely, insofar as the Americans involved weren't empowered to interact on behalf of the U.S. with any Russian. If the contact was so innocently innocuous, why deny that it happened or voluntarily assert that it didn't happen?

What people are saying is so fking what?

Well, the "so what" of it depends on what was discussed, and the people involved aren't exactly forthcoming about that seeing as they have each begun from a position of having denied the existentiality of interactions.and relationships.

Well go get a warrant

Well go get a warrant

Why, when dealing with the people who are privileged to serve the U.S. in the highest offices and in roles that require the utmost integrity should that even be necessary? Why should the people involved not just answer honestly and/or volunteer the information because they know it's what's being asked about?

If your spouse were looking for something and you knew where it was, would you make them ask you about it, or would you volunteer the information? The "Russia" issue is substantively no different, except that the scope and gravitas of the matter is vastly greater.

So how do you get Russia input to cooberate stories? Or are you talking wire tapping?

Getting Russia's/Russians' input isn't the point. Americans were asked about their interactions and relationships with Russians, and they denied having any, only to later to be found to have had both. That's what's wrong.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

Why, when dealing with the people who are privileged to serve the U.S. in the highest offices and in roles that require the utmost integrity should that even be necessary? Why should the people involved not just answer honestly and/or volunteer the information because they know it's what's being asked about?

If your spouse were looking for something and you knew where it was, would you make them ask you about it, or would you volunteer the information? The "Russia" issue is substantively no different, except that the scope and gravitas of the matter is vastly greater.

The Mafia ran the nation for the last 8 years. For the left to speak of integrity is beyond the pale. (Fast & Furious, Operation Choke Point)

The "Russia" bullshit is a witch hunt propagated by the fascist left due to their anger over losing power.

That is 100% of the "issue."

 

[LaDexter]

Why, when dealing with the people who are privileged to serve the U.S. in the highest offices and in roles that require the utmost integrity should that even be necessary? Why should the people involved not just answer honestly and/or volunteer the information because they know it's what's being asked about?

If your spouse were looking for something and you knew where it was, would you make them ask you about it, or would you volunteer the information? The "Russia" issue is substantively no different, except that the scope and gravitas of the matter is vastly greater.

Sincerely,

the founder of "Move On"


which was created to shout down anyone who noticed each and every time Bill and Hillary got caught lying...

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

Getting Russia's/Russians' input isn't the point. Americans were asked about their interactions and relationships with Russians, and they denied having any, only to later to be found to have had both. That's what's wrong.

No, slander and libel is the point. You have no need to offer facts, you just need to sew fear, uncertainty and doubt. This is a good old fashioned witch hunt.

 

[LaDexter]

The Mafia ran the nation for the last 8 years

The Democrats are not the Mafia.

Rather, they are a Ponzi Scheme to rip off the taxpayer as much as possible, simply by lying, not by using Tommie guns...


It starts with "I care"

and ends with all the money being spent vanishing into the hands of those who spent it....

 

[bripat9643]

The Mafia ran the nation for the last 8 years

The Democrats are not the Mafia.

Rather, they are a Ponzi Scheme to rip off the taxpayer as much as possible, simply by lying, not by using Tommie guns...


It starts with "I care"

and ends with all the money being spent vanishing into the hands of those who spent it....

The Democrats are indeed an organized criminal gang.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

What plans were they making to throw the election?

What an idiot Trump is, it just get worst and worst. In 03 Putin made the rounds to countries, Schumer was not up for re election and Bush was President. How utterly stupid is Trump and how utterly stupid are those who fall for the crap he peddles.

why, isn't it a tie to Russia? isn't that the story line going on? seems you are concerned if you don't want it investigated. let's investigate all of this russia shit. bring it on Dems? let's see who's been in the sack with Russia over the decades.

Who questioned NATO and said good things about Russia. Trump. Not Clinton.

You hate Russia we got it, but your hate will not stop this nation from moving forward with normalized relations with Russia.

If Only the Russians Had Elected Stephen Hawking

Putin's manliness is what really offends the degenerate weaklings.

 

[LaDexter]

The Democrats are indeed an organized criminal gang

until the GOP stands up and holds them accountable, they are above the law.

In 1998 when the GOP big spenders got rid of Newt, they formed an alliance to steal with the Dems. The GOP has been as bad if not worse than the Dems on spending since 1998. W was worse than LBJ. Both will continue to steal and be above the law while stealing unless Jeff Sessions decides to join a Star Trek episode and become his "double" from the "opposite universe." Sessions has been spending and cashing in with the Dems since 1998, especially when W socialized senior drugs in 2004 by lying to the Congress about the estimated cost.

 

[jc456]

What people are saying is so fking what?

Well, the "so what" of it depends on what was discussed, and the people involved aren't exactly forthcoming about that seeing as they have each begun from a position of having denied the existentiality of interactions.and relationships.

Well go get a warrant

Well go get a warrant

Why, when dealing with the people who are privileged to serve the U.S. in the highest offices and in roles that require the utmost integrity should that even be necessary? Why should the people involved not just answer honestly and/or volunteer the information because they know it's what's being asked about?

If your spouse were looking for something and you knew where it was, would you make them ask you about it, or would you volunteer the information? The "Russia" issue is substantively no different, except that the scope and gravitas of the matter is vastly greater.

So how do you get Russia input to cooberate stories? Or are you talking wire tapping?

Getting Russia's/Russians' input isn't the point. Americans were asked about their interactions and relationships with Russians, and they denied having any, only to later to be found to have had both. That's what's wrong.

oh I see, I thought it was about the campaign. why are you now trying to move the goalposts?

 

[jc456]

The Mafia ran the nation for the last 8 years

The Democrats are not the Mafia.

Rather, they are a Ponzi Scheme to rip off the taxpayer as much as possible, simply by lying, not by using Tommie guns...


It starts with "I care"

and ends with all the money being spent vanishing into the hands of those who spent it....

What happened to that intern from the DNC shot in the back after the wasserman shultz leak? Mafia indeed it is.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Sincerely,

the founder of "Move On"


which was created to shout down anyone who noticed each and every time Bill and Hillary got caught lying...

The founder of MoveOn, the financier of DailyKOS, ThinkProgress, TruthOut, MediaMatters and Alternet.

The Soros hate sites dictate not only what the democrats think about any issue, but also what the MSM reports. Controlling what is reported controls what people think.

 

[jc456]

Sincerely,

the founder of "Move On"


which was created to shout down anyone who noticed each and every time Bill and Hillary got caught lying...

The founder of MoveOn, the financier of DailyKOS, ThinkProgress, TruthOut, MediaMatters and Alternet.

The Soros hate sites dictate not only what the democrats think about any issue, but also what the MSM reports. Controlling what is reported controls what people think.

I heard that prior to the Pres's speech, the dems got orders on how to behave in the chamber. Who are these fks anyway? I thought they were representatives of the people not the party?

 

[Uncensored2008]

The Mafia ran the nation for the last 8 years

The Democrats are not the Mafia.

Rather, they are a Ponzi Scheme to rip off the taxpayer as much as possible, simply by lying, not by using Tommie guns...


It starts with "I care"

and ends with all the money being spent vanishing into the hands of those who spent it....

Read up on Operation Choke Point, then try and convince yourself of that.

 

[brummelben]

What plans were they making to throw the election?

What an idiot Trump is, it just get worst and worst. In 03 Putin made the rounds to countries, Schumer was not up for re election and Bush was President. How utterly stupid is Trump and how utterly stupid are those who fall for the crap he peddles.

why, isn't it a tie to Russia? isn't that the story line going on? seems you are concerned if you don't want it investigated. let's investigate all of this russia shit. bring it on Dems? let's see who's been in the sack with Russia over the decades.

Its not a matter of over the decades, its all about RIGHT NOW!

 

[LaDexter]

Mafia indeed it is.

Actually, there aren't any Italians murdering for the Dems. The same entity got JFK, Vince Foster, and likely Hillary's "aide...."

The Mossad. Israel wanted Hillary to win. The "Never Trump" group was 100% Israelis...

"The Mafia" refers to the Italian organized crime mostly around NY/NJ. That is not the Mossad. The Mossad are the most cowardly murderers on the planet. They conceal, lie, disguise, and murder again to cover up....

 

[jc456]

Mafia indeed it is.

Actually, there aren't any Italians murdering for the Dems. The same entity got JFK, Vince Foster, and likely Hillary's "aide...."

The Mossad. Israel wanted Hillary to win. The "Never Trump" group was 100% Israelis...

"The Mafia" refers to the Italian organized crime mostly around NY/NJ. That is not the Mossad. The Mossad are the most cowardly murderers on the planet. They conceal, lie, disguise, and murder again to cover up....

 

[jc456]

What plans were they making to throw the election?

What an idiot Trump is, it just get worst and worst. In 03 Putin made the rounds to countries, Schumer was not up for re election and Bush was President. How utterly stupid is Trump and how utterly stupid are those who fall for the crap he peddles.

why, isn't it a tie to Russia? isn't that the story line going on? seems you are concerned if you don't want it investigated. let's investigate all of this russia shit. bring it on Dems? let's see who's been in the sack with Russia over the decades.

Its not a matter of over the decades, its all about RIGHT NOW!

what about RIGHT NOW?

 

[boedicca]

The Dems started this witch hunt. The best tactic is to reflect it back at them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is the GOP strategy, which is why I'm no longer a conservative politically.

Oh blah blah blah so sleepy zzzzzzzz

The DEMS started this witch hunt.

 

[usmbguest5318]

Why, when dealing with the people who are privileged to serve the U.S. in the highest offices and in roles that require the utmost integrity should that even be necessary? Why should the people involved not just answer honestly and/or volunteer the information because they know it's what's being asked about?

If your spouse were looking for something and you knew where it was, would you make them ask you about it, or would you volunteer the information? The "Russia" issue is substantively no different, except that the scope and gravitas of the matter is vastly greater.

Sincerely,
the founder of "Move On"

which was created to shout down anyone who noticed each and every time Bill and Hillary got caught lying...

Well, you can dwell on the past and current editorial positions of others. I will form and focus on mine which I develop based on my own read of situations and facts, and if others happen to share them, well they just do. They are welcome to follow or echo my ideas, but I'm not looking to jump on anyone's bandwagon even if it looks like mine.

 

[usmbguest5318]

Well, the "so what" of it depends on what was discussed, and the people involved aren't exactly forthcoming about that seeing as they have each begun from a position of having denied the existentiality of interactions.and relationships.

Well go get a warrant

Well go get a warrant

Why, when dealing with the people who are privileged to serve the U.S. in the highest offices and in roles that require the utmost integrity should that even be necessary? Why should the people involved not just answer honestly and/or volunteer the information because they know it's what's being asked about?

If your spouse were looking for something and you knew where it was, would you make them ask you about it, or would you volunteer the information? The "Russia" issue is substantively no different, except that the scope and gravitas of the matter is vastly greater.

So how do you get Russia input to cooberate stories? Or are you talking wire tapping?

Getting Russia's/Russians' input isn't the point. Americans were asked about their interactions and relationships with Russians, and they denied having any, only to later to be found to have had both. That's what's wrong.

oh I see, I thought it was about the campaign. why are you now trying to move the goalposts?

Well, there's your first mistake.

If the topic of their discussions was the campaign, that in an of itself isn't problematic. The problem/issue with which I take exception is:

• The Americans involved -- Trump and his crew -- have lied (directly or by omission or misrepresentation) about the nature and/or existence of their relationship with leaders/agents of a non-ally government.

Whether there's an issue with the subtext of the relationships and conversations depends on what the parties involved discussed and how they acted in connection with those discussions. If the discussions pertained somehow to Russia taking action of any sort in the U.S. political process, that is one way in which the discussions would be a very serious problem for it necessarily hints at being seditious. There are other campaign/electoral lines of discussion that would be highly problematic and there are some that are not problematic at all, even if they were related to the campaign.

Right now, the preponderance of information and observations that has come available suggests something nefarious was afoot in those conversations. The Trump team could have avoided creating painting the matter that way were they to never have denied having had meetings and conversations with key agents of an adversary nation; however, they did not at their earliest opportunity do so.