Secret Service sacrificing its reputation to protect drug offender in the White House

[JohnDB]

Either the law applies to EVERYONE or to NO ONE.

 

[surada]

Narrow the list down. Its mostly staffers who use that area. You can rule every single one of them out because, they are all drug tested regularly. You know, do a normal investigation?

You want to drug test assorted tourists and visitors? This isn't North Korea.

 

[surada]

‘No Forensic Evidence to Prove It’ – Top Spox John Kirby Brushes Off Biden White House Cocaine Scandal ​

'No Forensic Evidence to Prove It' - Top Spox John Kirby Brushes Off Biden White House Cocaine Scandal (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

On Sunday, White House spox John Kirby brushed off the Biden White House cocaine scandal after the investigation concluded without identifying a suspect.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

16 Jul 2023 ~~ By Cristina Laila

On Sunday, White House spox John Kirby brushed off the Biden White House cocaine scandal after the investigation concluded without identifying a suspect.
Secret Service closed its investigation into the Biden White House cocaine scandal without conducting any interviews.
The Secret Service on Thursday concluded its investigation into the cocaine scandal that rocked the White House earlier this month.
No suspect was identified.
Shocker!
According to CNN, the baggy of cocaine was “found in a blind spot for surveillance cameras.”
No fingerprints, DNA samples, or leads!
According to Secret Service spokesman Anthony Gugliemi, the agency didn’t interview the 500 potential culprits because it would be a strain on resources.
Kirby brushed off the cocaine scandal.

​

Commentary:
Now I'll bet they lied to us about the amount of Coke they found, too.
Of course there's plenty of evidence - They're just gonna twist some facts and manipulate some grammar to keep the sheep bleating in unison.
Translation of Kirby`s statement:

“There is more than enough forensic evidence to convict Hunter, we’re trying to hide it as best we can until this whole thing blows over. Knowing the attention span of the average American voter is ten minutes, this should be long forgotten by Tuesday.”​

Kirby is the proverbial ``Yes man`. He will repeat any lie he has been told and not blink an eye. You don't become an Admiral in the Navy with no actual sea experience unless you nod and bow.
Here`s a good comparison, the Long Island killer investigation went on for 15 years. The investigation of cocaine in the White House took only 15 days.
It`s obviously Hunter's coke and anyone that believes differently is a freaking joke...

​

You're getting crazier by the day. Check yourself.

 

[Doc7505]

10 Absurd Assumptions You Have To Swallow To Believe The White House-Cocaine Failure Theater​

10 Things The White House Insists You Believe About The Cocaine

Here are 10 assumptions you have to uncritically accept in order to make the bumbling White House's talking points make sense.

thefederalist.com

20 Jul 23023 ~~ By Elle Purnell

The idiots running the asylum formerly known as Washington, D.C., aren’t even trying anymore. Gone are the days when malfeasance and hoaxes were respectably cloaked in falsehoods that at least sounded plausible. Now, the emperor knows he has no clothes, he knows you know it, and he doesn’t care — in fact, he might march down the street and gyrate in your face.
It’s not a good development for lovers of self-governance, but there’s a kind of camaraderie in knowing everyone else with half a brain cell can see through the act. Besides, it’s obvious the clownish powers-that-be think you’re utterly stupid, and there’s a tactical advantage to being underestimated.
In their latest act of condescending foolery, they’ve flaunted what was either a shameless coverup or unbelievable incompetence in the Mysterious Case of the Teeny-Tiny Cocaine Baggie Someone Left Somewhere in the White House But That’s All We Know, Folks. The messaging has fluctuated from “Must have been a tourist!” to “Kamala?” to “It’s irresponsible to ask questions about this,” but the bottom line is that there’s no way, absolutely not, that it could possibly belong to admitted drug addict and apparent White House resident Hunter Biden — no doubt about it.
I’m sure they’re counting on some people to be stupid enough to buy the act, and I’m sure some have. But they’re counting on far more to be complacent enough not to care.
Here are 10 assumptions you have to gulp down in order to make the bumbling White House’s talking points make sense.

1. A Tourist Would Be Brazen Enough to Bring Cocaine to the West Wing and Leave It There ​

2. The Cocaine Made It Through Security Checkpoints ​

3. White House Security Cameras Are Useless ​

4. Visitor Logs Are Also Useless ​

5. The Careless Cocaine Carrier Was Wearing Gloves on a Hot Summer Day ​

6. Secret Service Would Have Been Helpless if the Baggie Were Full of Ricin ​

7. The Drug Addict Living at the White House Is Not a Worthwhile Investigative Lead ​

8. The Man Who Left a Laptop Full of Criminal Evidence Lying Around Wouldn’t Do the Same with Nose Candy ​

9. Secret Service Would Never Cover for the Bidens (Even Though They Have Before) ​

10. It’s Totally Normal That the White House Won’t Deny the Cocaine Is the Bidens’​

It would take a willful idiot to buy all these assumptions at face value. And that’s precisely what the White House is counting on.


Commentary:
Obviously, Joe Biden and is handlers throw their absurd statements in our faces and belly laugh knowing there is nothing that will be done to counter their absurd claims.
The “investigation” was done to distract the public. There was no investigation. It was a coverup. The Quisling Media are now in process of throwing the incident down the memory hole. It will never be mentioned again unless real journalists investigate the issue.
Hunter may also have early states of dementia, he forgot to pick up his coke “drop”, just like he forgot his laptops.
Discounting all the above, you would have to believe it was a magic baggie that can move on it’s own to be found in THREE different places...
Maybe it`s that pesky invisible bunny that Joe Biden continues to shake hands and talks to that smuggled the coke into the Whitehouse..

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Doc7505

 

[Doc7505]

Doc7505

The sad thing is, if we were a noble nation; not serendipitously overtaken by far-left Marxist lunatics. They would:

A. Never have gotten this far and been prosecuted over ten years ago at least!​

B. Been prosecuted for their now known crimes, and this one as well regardless of its intent.​

C. All of their co-conspirators on this and every other crime rounded up on RICO charges.​

And prosecuted to the FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW!
Instead, we got a Banana Republic! And they get to persecute their political enemies.

​

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Where is the evidence for the allegations. There is nothing, which is the general position of MAGA, a lot of mouth farting nothing.

 

[ABikerSailor]

I'm guessing all of you idiots out there who say we are living in a police state, or a banana republic have zero idea what those things are. Yeah, they are something that the US has been against since they came around, and yeah, they sound like scary terms. But no, we aren't either one of those.

If any of you idiots out there currently think we are in a police state, or living under a banana republic, please, post actual evidence of what has happened in this country to make us either of those things.

I'm guessing you can't. You're just pissed that your boy Trump lost and is now being held accountable for his actions.

 

[BlueGin]

What difference does it make?
Either one would be fired and maybe enter a drug rehab if found.

Our society, except for Conservatives, no longer freaks out over minor drug offenses

That’s not why they are covering it up and you know it.

 

[rightwinger]

That’s not why they are covering it up and you know it.

Who really cares about a tiny amount of coke?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

MAGA and GOP, yet once again, make allegations without corroborating evidence.

This turns the discerning voter off.

 

[Doc7505]

Where is the evidence for the allegations. There is nothing, which is the general position of MAGA, a lot of mouth farting nothing.

~~~~~~
I guess you didn't hear or read of the credible testimonies of Shapely and Ziegler.

6 Ridiculous Narratives Dems Tried In Response To Whistleblowers

IRS whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler ran circles around Democrats in Wednesday's House Oversight hearing.

thefederalist.com

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

~~~~~~
I guess you didn't hear or read of the credible testimonies of Shapely and Ziegler.

6 Ridiculous Narratives Dems Tried In Response To Whistleblowers

IRS whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler ran circles around Democrats in Wednesday's House Oversight hearing.

thefederalist.com

There is no corroborating evidence for their words.

 

[candycorn]

Secret Service sacrificing its reputation to protect drug offender in the White House​

Secret Service sacrificing its reputation to protect drug offender in the White House

See also: The case of the missing fingerprint Another formerly revered federal agency joins in disgrace the politicized FBI, IRS, and Department of Justice. The Secret Service took just 11 days to close its investigation of the class A illeg...

www.americanthinker.com

14 Jul 2023 ~~ By Thomas Lifson​

See also: The case of the missing fingerprint

Another formerly revered federal agency joins in disgrace the politicized FBI, IRS, and Department of Justice. The Secret Service took just 11 days to close its investigation of the class A illegal drug, cocaine, found in the White House with a figurative shrug of the shoulders and a mumbled “I dunno.”
Following a classified briefing for members of Congress, the federal protective agency issued an official statement claiming:

There was no surveillance video footage found that provided investigative leads or any other means for investigators to identify who may have deposited the found substance in this area. Without physical evidence, the investigation will not be able to single out a person of interest from the hundreds of individuals who passed through the vestibule where the cocaine was discovered. At this time, the Secret Service's investigation is closed due to a lack of physical evidence.​

This does not pass the giggle test. Taking only 11 days to investigate a very serious matter like this and then closing the investigation without interrogating and drug testing the very limited number of people who could have left anything in the locker in question bespeaks a desire to avoid finding the culprit. Considering the vast ongoing effort to identify anyone who could have approached the Capitol on January 6, 2021, the lack of curiosity, paucity of resources employed, and the speed in wrapping up the investigation with no suspect, there is no other conclusion than a cover up is likely underway.
~Snip~
Further cause for suspicion is the fact that Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre lied about family members not being present in the White House the Friday before the Independence Day weekend. Piers Morgan took her to task for this and for her chastisement of members of the press who dared question her.
~Snip~
Dan Bongino, who spent years as a Secret Service agent assigned to the White House is adamant that security screening would have detected the substance, and that the only possibility is that someone not subject to the screening – i.e., family members –could have brought in the coke.

**********

Commentary:
Tom Lifson keys in on this problem a bit later. We know the Secret Service can do it. They probably did do it and know. Their problem is no longer the cocaine as that job is done. They are now covering up what they found.
There is a big pile of dirt under a huge rug somewhere in DC. And the sweeping continues.
What is amazing is how many government agencies are sacrificing their reputations for Joe Biden and the Democrat Party..

I think the reputation was done irreparable harm when it hired Bonjingo.

 

[Doc7505]

There is no corroborating evidence for their words.

~~~~~~

testimony

www.law.cornell.edu

**********​

Testimony Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

Testimony is a statement made in a legal proceeding or legislative hearing by a witness while under oath. A witness who provides false testimony is guilty of perjury and may be punished by

definitions.uslegal.com

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Thanks, doc7505, for proving my point that the testimony is unsupported.

 

[Doc7505]

Thanks, doc7505, for proving my point that the testimony is unsupported.

~~~~~~~
Wrong! both Shapely and Ziegler were sworn in under oath, before the questioning began. Therefore, their testimony is considered evidentiary/evidence.

testimony

www.law.cornell.edu

``Testimony is oral or written evidence given by the witness under oath, affidavit, or deposition during a trial or other legal procedures. According to Rule 43 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, testimony taking should be conducted in an open court unless other federal rules apply, like the Federal Rules of Evidence`` .

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

... but not supported.

 

[Doc7505]

... but not supported.

~~~~~~
Wrong again...

Rule 603. Oath or Affirmation to Testify Truthfully

www.law.cornell.edu

Rule 603. Oath or Affirmation to Testify Truthfully Primary tabs​

Before testifying, a witness must give an oath or affirmation to testify truthfully. It must be in a form designed to impress that duty on the witness’s conscience.

Notes​

(Pub. L. 93–595, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1934; Mar. 2, 1987, eff. Oct. 1, 1987; Apr. 26, 2011, eff. Dec. 1, 2011.)
Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules
The rule is designed to afford the flexibility required in dealing with religious adults, atheists, conscientious objectors, mental defectives, and children. Affirmation is simply a solemn undertaking to tell the truth; no special verbal formula is required. As is true generally, affirmation is recognized by federal law. “Oath” includes affirmation, 1 U.S.C. §1; judges and clerks may administer oaths and affirmations, 28 U.S.C. §§459, 953; and affirmations are acceptable in lieu of oaths under Rule 43(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Perjury by a witness is a crime, 18 U.S.C. §1621.
Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1987 Amendment
The amendments are technical. No substantive change is intended.
Committee Notes on Rules—2011 Amendment
The language of Rule 603 has been amended as part of the restyling of the Evidence Rules to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. These changes are intended to be stylistic only. There is no intent to change any result in any ruling on evidence admissibility.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

They testified to what they were asked. Their testimony was not supported by other evidence.