CarlinAnnArbor
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 56,121
- 41,012
- 3,615
This is real life. Democrats want the innocent to sacrifice themselves for their criminal voting base
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, one of them lived to commit crimes another day, so it could have been better. Still, the innocent livedI love happy endings.
Who doesn't? Except maybe women who don't really believe in equality.I love happy endings.
Where does the 2nd Amendment mention self defence? I've never been able to find that bit.
Pro-Second Amendment citizens that own firearms, aren't the tyrannical government....far leftist governments are and have been tyrannical, thus citizens must remain armed, should Marxism/Leninism gain control over the nation.No idea what you mean. Our Second Amendment is clear. We should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and Regulate them Well!
Where do I say that? I'm at a disadvantage in these discussions, everyone else can see invisible writing.So you agree that the 2nd is designed to protect us from a tyrannical government?
Where do I say that? I'm at a disadvantage in these discussions, everyone else can see invisible writing.So you agree that the 2nd is designed to protect us from a tyrannical government?
It doesn't. The Intent and Purpose is in the first clause not the second clause.Where does the 2nd Amendment mention self defence? I've never been able to find that bit.
I only agree our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States.Where does the 2nd Amendment mention self defence? I've never been able to find that bit.
So you agree that the 2nd is designed to protect us from a tyrannical government?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.Pro-Second Amendment citizens that own firearms, aren't the tyrannical government....far leftist governments are and have been tyrannical, thus citizens must remain armed, should Marxism/Leninism gain control over the nation.No idea what you mean. Our Second Amendment is clear. We should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and Regulate them Well!
The Second Amendment provides for citizens to have the right to own weapons, so that should the need arise, they can form militias and use said weapons to resist a tyrannical government, whether foreign or......domestic and that, that right to have those weapons shall not be infringed upon (taken from them). That some people only purchase a pistol for self defense in their home was not the intent of the Amendment is irrelevant. You as an individual do have the right to use any force, including deadly force if necessary against someone breaking into your home to do you and/or your loved ones, bodily harm (i.e. home invasions), or even a single individual intent on stealing your hard earned property, in your home. Your home is your last bastion of safety and if scumbags break in there, they forfeit the right to life.Where do I say that? I'm at a disadvantage in these discussions, everyone else can see invisible writing.So you agree that the 2nd is designed to protect us from a tyrannical government?
You dipshits are always saying the 2nd is for self defense.
And while thats true it's main purpose is to stop a tyrannical government.
So which is it? You cant have it both ways.
Funny...your boy biden says you dont need an AR for self defense,you just shoot through the door with a shotgun.
The Second Amendment provides for citizens to have the right to own weapons, so that should the need arise, they can form militias and use said weapons to resist a tyrannical government, whether foreign or......domestic and that, that right to have those weapons shall not be infringed upon (taken from them). That some people only purchase a pistol for self defense in their home was not the intent of the Amendment is irrelevant. You as an individual do have the right to use any force, including deadly force if necessary against someone breaking into your home to do you and/or your loved ones, bodily harm, or even steal the hard earned property in your home. Your home is your last bastion of safety and if scumbags break in there, they forfeit the right to life.Where do I say that? I'm at a disadvantage in these discussions, everyone else can see invisible writing.So you agree that the 2nd is designed to protect us from a tyrannical government?
You dipshits are always saying the 2nd is for self defense.
And while thats true it's main purpose is to stop a tyrannical government.
So which is it? You cant have it both ways.
Funny...your boy biden says you dont need an AR for self defense,you just shoot through the door with a shotgun.