You just earned yourself ill-mannered oaf status on my ignore list. Bye, abuser.Telling the truth, which would not know if slapped you on your ass.
"Right To Life", means nothing if you support a dictator killing unborn in Ukraine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You just earned yourself ill-mannered oaf status on my ignore list. Bye, abuser.Telling the truth, which would not know if slapped you on your ass.
"Right To Life", means nothing if you support a dictator killing unborn in Ukraine.
You have just transitioned from ridiculous to bat-shit CRAZY!So, would you support removing the general 2 week bereavement period from work when a woman has a miscarriage? After all, since it's just a lump of cells, there's no reason to get upset over losing that, right?
Can't find any info on fetal cancer treatments.......What are you talking about?
A cancer cell is a person who has already been born?
Wtf????
Your tax dollars are killing the unborn in Ukraine."Right To Life", means nothing if you support a dictator killing unborn in Ukraine.
It's a legitimate question. You all claim that it's not a baby, it's just a lump of cells and removing it would be no different than removing a tumor..that is until someone has a miscarriage, or gets into an accident and the woman loses the pregnancy...THEN it becomes a baby.You have just transitioned from ridiculous to bat-shit CRAZY!
If the woman doesn't want it and she looses it then not even an issue right?It's a legitimate question. You all claim that it's not a baby, it's just a lump of cells and removing it would be no different than removing a tumor..that is until someone has a miscarriage, or gets into an accident and the woman loses the pregnancy...THEN it becomes a baby.
So, I'm just curious what you think? Is it a baby...or isn't it? If not, does a woman deserve grieving period after a miscarriage or not? Does a woman get to sue if someone causes a collision and she loses the pregnancy? You can't have it both ways.
Shut up, eugenicist filth.Stop projecting, you are a horrible person to attack other people like this but you can change there is still hope for you.
Holy shit. You’re actually fucking retarded.You can't kill something that never had a life to begin with.
If the woman doesn't want it and she looses it then not even an issue right?
A woman (or anybody else for that matter) can sue if someone else causes a traffic accident.
Certainly.
Time off after an abortion?
Sure.
Just like with any other surgery.
Your questions are ridiculous.
Obviously trying to "prove" some double standard.
Why?
Is that the only anti women's autonomy argument you have?
If the woman doesn't want it and she looses it then not even an issue right?
woman (or anybody else for that matter) can sue if someone else causes a traffic accident.
Certainly.
Time off after an abortion?
Sure.
Just like with any other surgery.
Obviously trying to "prove" some double standard.
Is that the only anti women's autonomy argument you have?
Shut up, eugenicist filth.
You two are inhuman hatemongering peas in a pod.
For women who do not want the pregnancy it is just an unwanted cell mass.That wasn't the question I asked, but are you saying if she wants it, it's a baby, if she doesn't, then it's not? How does that work?
Again, not the question I asked. If someone causes a collision that terminates her pregnancy, can she sue for the loss of the baby?
Again, not the question I asked. I was asking about the grieving period that company's give to women after a miscarriage. Since it's not a baby, and just a lump of cells, do you support revoking the grieving period for her body ejecting a lump of cells?
Because it is a double standard. Its only a baby when it's wanted and convenient, but it's a lump of cells when it's not.
It's not an anti autonomy argument, I'm just trying to figure out if you really believe it's just a lump of cells, if you do, then you must surely support treating the woman carrying that lump of cells as if it's just a normal mundane tissue mass that has no meaning whatsoever.
Lucky someone didn't regret a roll in the hay in your past.For women who do not want the pregnancy it is just an unwanted cell mass.
That's not even remotely scientific. It's a baby...or it's not. It doesn't change depending on the whims of the mother. And you still haven't answered my questions.For women who do not want the pregnancy it is just an unwanted cell mass.
And yes, they should be free to do with it what they choose.
That's the autonomy part.
Control over their own bodies.
Women that want the pregnancy should also feel free to handle it how they choose.
Even up to and including calling the little parasitic organism a "baby" as early on in the pregnancy as she wants.
Nobody should have the right to make these choices for others though.
I am saying you should not be meddling with your opinions in what other women want to do with their own bodies.That's not even remotely scientific. It's a baby...or it's not. It doesn't change depending on the whims of the mother. And you still haven't answered my questions.
So, you're saying that if a woman gets pregnant, she can say "it's not a baby", and make plans to get an abortion, but then wake up the next day and say "actually I think I'll keep it" and then suddenly it becomes a baby?
Legally speaking, you're full of BS.I am saying you should not be meddling with your opinions in what other women want to do with their own bodies.
Period.
Your only concern is your own body.
Ditto for everyone else.
Bullshit.For women who do not want the pregnancy it is just an unwanted cell mass.
We took care of this in the 1860s, but apparently you didn't get the memo.And yes, they should be free to do with it what they choose.
Your kid is not your body.That's the autonomy part.
Control over their own bodies.
Go fuck yourself.Even up to and including calling the little parasitic organism
I don't want to mess with a woman's body, she can do what she wants, but we need to make a determination. Is it a baby or isn't it? This wishy washy back and forth, it's a baby is the mother says it is doesn't work.I am saying you should not be meddling with your opinions in what other women want to do with their own bodies.
Period.
Your only concern is your own body.
Ditto for everyone else.
I don't see the states as being responsible. the whole reason Roe versus Wade came into being is because the states were passing such egregious abortion laws they were killing women. they lost that right years ago, a right that isn't theirs in the first place.ThisIsMe
I don't think you understand what I'm trying to say. When I say I don't think the gov should make laws on abortion, I mean for or against. It's a privacy thing first, but for sure a states rights rather than a federal decision.
“Killing women.”I don't see the states as being responsible. the whole reason Roe versus Wade came into being is because the states were passing such egregious abortion laws they were killing women. they lost that right years ago, a right that isn't theirs in the first place.
And as with anything given in allowance to all human beings, it is given them with warnings and stipulations. Break the rules, ignore the warnings, and pay the consequences. Just because a woman is the vehicle that carries a child to birth, doesn't give her the right to violate the unchallenged rules on ethic's, moral's (thou shalt not kill), and especially she doesn't have the right to violate law's that are put into place pertaining to the murder of another human being.There is only one side. The pregnant womans.
Nobody else has a say in the matter.
How old are you ? Obviously not old enough to remember how horrible things were. We are just starting to see the atrocities that are occurring to women in Texas and Oklahoma. It's only going to get worse.“Killing women.”
What a preposterous load of codswallop.