Schiff BUSTEd For Producing False Evidence / Lying Again To Push Impeachment / False Narrative

I do. Apparently you don’t know what it means to falsify a document. If you do, can you cite the criminal statute that applies?
He's putting out fake information in an attempt to bolster his illegitimate case for impeachment.
It was a minor point, and if he got it wrong it should be corrected. Maybe the administration could actually participate in the investigation these things wouldn’t happen.

But it has zero to do with falsifying documents, which is essentially forgery and is an idiotic charge to make.
Got it wrong? No, Schiff has lied numerous times to justify this obvious attempt to overthrow the President. And why should Republicans participate in an investigation that is based on a manufactured offense?

Because they have a constitutional requirement to participate.
Yeah, IF the accusers can produce some solid evidence to back up their allegations, which they have yet to do.

What gives you the impression the executive gets to decide when it will allow oversight?
 
(Somewhere, in some dark corner of the House, sitting all by herself in the dark, Speaker Nancy Pelosi sits, head bowed with her head resting in her hands, wondering how the hell she ever trusted Schiff with running their coup attempt, and regretting every word of yesterday's announcement that the House will move forward with Impeachment.....)
Just look at her... she looks like she's aged 30 years in the last 3. All that lying and trying to keep them all straight topped off with an unmitigated, uncontrollable hate has taken a toll on her. I wouldn't be surprised if we heard any day that she had a huge stroke. She looks like she's got one foot in the grave now.
 
He's putting out fake information in an attempt to bolster his illegitimate case for impeachment.
It was a minor point, and if he got it wrong it should be corrected. Maybe the administration could actually participate in the investigation these things wouldn’t happen.

But it has zero to do with falsifying documents, which is essentially forgery and is an idiotic charge to make.
Got it wrong? No, Schiff has lied numerous times to justify this obvious attempt to overthrow the President. And why should Republicans participate in an investigation that is based on a manufactured offense?

Because they have a constitutional requirement to participate.
Yeah, IF the accusers can produce some solid evidence to back up their allegations, which they have yet to do.

What gives you the impression the executive gets to decide when it will allow oversight?
The better question is who has oversight of the House?
 
He's putting out fake information in an attempt to bolster his illegitimate case for impeachment.
It was a minor point, and if he got it wrong it should be corrected. Maybe the administration could actually participate in the investigation these things wouldn’t happen.

But it has zero to do with falsifying documents, which is essentially forgery and is an idiotic charge to make.
Got it wrong? No, Schiff has lied numerous times to justify this obvious attempt to overthrow the President. And why should Republicans participate in an investigation that is based on a manufactured offense?

Because they have a constitutional requirement to participate.
Yeah, IF the accusers can produce some solid evidence to back up their allegations, which they have yet to do.

What gives you the impression the executive gets to decide when it will allow oversight?
What gives you the impression the President can't mount a defense, and challenge subpoenas in court?
 
It was a minor point, and if he got it wrong it should be corrected. Maybe the administration could actually participate in the investigation these things wouldn’t happen.

But it has zero to do with falsifying documents, which is essentially forgery and is an idiotic charge to make.
Got it wrong? No, Schiff has lied numerous times to justify this obvious attempt to overthrow the President. And why should Republicans participate in an investigation that is based on a manufactured offense?

Because they have a constitutional requirement to participate.
Yeah, IF the accusers can produce some solid evidence to back up their allegations, which they have yet to do.

What gives you the impression the executive gets to decide when it will allow oversight?
What gives you the impression the President can't mount a defense, and challenge subpoenas in court?
His handlers told him
 
It was a minor point, and if he got it wrong it should be corrected. Maybe the administration could actually participate in the investigation these things wouldn’t happen.

But it has zero to do with falsifying documents, which is essentially forgery and is an idiotic charge to make.
Got it wrong? No, Schiff has lied numerous times to justify this obvious attempt to overthrow the President. And why should Republicans participate in an investigation that is based on a manufactured offense?

Because they have a constitutional requirement to participate.
Yeah, IF the accusers can produce some solid evidence to back up their allegations, which they have yet to do.

What gives you the impression the executive gets to decide when it will allow oversight?
The better question is who has oversight of the House?
The House oversees its own members when it comes to ethics violations. The DoJ can investigate and prosecute members of Congress as well (see a Trump loving Duncan Hunter as a recent example).
 
Got it wrong? No, Schiff has lied numerous times to justify this obvious attempt to overthrow the President. And why should Republicans participate in an investigation that is based on a manufactured offense?

Because they have a constitutional requirement to participate.
Yeah, IF the accusers can produce some solid evidence to back up their allegations, which they have yet to do.

What gives you the impression the executive gets to decide when it will allow oversight?
The better question is who has oversight of the House?
The House oversees its own members when it comes to ethics violations. The DoJ can investigate and prosecute members of Congress as well (see a Trump loving Duncan Hunter as a recent example).
Nope
 
Because they have a constitutional requirement to participate.
Yeah, IF the accusers can produce some solid evidence to back up their allegations, which they have yet to do.

What gives you the impression the executive gets to decide when it will allow oversight?
The better question is who has oversight of the House?
The House oversees its own members when it comes to ethics violations. The DoJ can investigate and prosecute members of Congress as well (see a Trump loving Duncan Hunter as a recent example).
Nope
Sorry, what?
 
Arresting the political opposition. How Stalinist of you.
What's the matter? Offended at the thought of Democrats repeatedly caught engaging in Sedition and attempting to present false manufactured information as 'evidence' being held accountable?

How 'Snowflake' / 'Democrat' of you...

You’re the only losing your mind over nothing.

Seriously though, you guys are acting like a bunch of authoritarian, corrupt thugs but demanding the arrest of political opposition for political purposes.
Schiff repeatedly being caught lying, attempting to falsify evidence , & engaging in Sedition - while being exposed as having taken money from Burisma and a Russian-born arms dealer - is not something anyone but a Democrat or traitor-supporting snowflake would take lightly / tolerate.
 
Last edited:
Arresting the political opposition. How Stalinist of you.
What's the matter? Offended at the thought of Democrats repeatedly caught engaging in Sedition and attempting to present false manufactured information as 'evidence' being held accountable?

How 'Snowflake' / 'Democrat' of you...

You’re the only losing your mind over nothing.

Seriously though, you guys are acting like a bunch of authoritarian, corrupt thugs but demanding the arrest of political opposition for political purposes.
Schiff repeatedly being caught lying, attempting to falsify evidence , & engaging in Sedition - while being exposed as having taken money from Burisma and a Russian-born arms dealer is not something anyone but a Democrat or traitor-supporting snowflake would take lightly / tolerate.
It’s like you guys are addicted to conspiracy theories. Ukrainian arms deals, okay. Buddy. Keep drinking that Kool aid.
 
Yeah, IF the accusers can produce some solid evidence to back up their allegations, which they have yet to do.

What gives you the impression the executive gets to decide when it will allow oversight?
The better question is who has oversight of the House?
The House oversees its own members when it comes to ethics violations. The DoJ can investigate and prosecute members of Congress as well (see a Trump loving Duncan Hunter as a recent example).
Nope
Sorry, what?
One can’t oversee itself. That’s not oversight
 
What gives you the impression the executive gets to decide when it will allow oversight?
The better question is who has oversight of the House?
The House oversees its own members when it comes to ethics violations. The DoJ can investigate and prosecute members of Congress as well (see a Trump loving Duncan Hunter as a recent example).
Nope
Sorry, what?
One can’t oversee itself. That’s not oversight
The House is a large body. They’ve demonstrated themselves capable of investigating their own.

But I guess you decided to ignore the rest of the post where I said the DoJ has oversight of Congressmembers as well.
 
What other lies are you peddling today, you Russian piece of shit?

The only one proven to be connected to the Russians - a Russian-born arms dealer to be exact - is Schiff...

...and the only LIARS in this thread are YOU and Schiff.

YOU and Schiff have lied your ass off and claimed a law exists that affords non-qualifying 'Whistle Blowers' ANONYMITY and IMMUNITY.

When Schiff's fellow LAWYER House members demanded he present this non-existent 'law' he COULD NOT DO IT and ran away.

When I challenged YOU to back up YOUR claim that such a law exists you tucked your tail between your fat ass and ran away, refusing to TRY to provide evidence to support your LIE...like you have every time you pop up....like you will now.

You continue to avoid your LIE...while attempting to defend your fellow LIAR Schiff...and laughably keep throwing out pathetic references. ('Russian POS') to a DEBUNKED false allegation made by ignorant dumbass Democrats and snowflakes like you.

So where is the link to this non-existent law, lil' lying snowflake?
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: 007
The better question is who has oversight of the House?
The House oversees its own members when it comes to ethics violations. The DoJ can investigate and prosecute members of Congress as well (see a Trump loving Duncan Hunter as a recent example).
Nope
Sorry, what?
One can’t oversee itself. That’s not oversight
The House is a large body. They’ve demonstrated themselves capable of investigating their own.

But I guess you decided to ignore the rest of the post where I said the DoJ has oversight of Congressmembers as well.
One can’t oversee itself. Do you trust police departments overseeing their own?
 
The House oversees its own members when it comes to ethics violations. The DoJ can investigate and prosecute members of Congress as well (see a Trump loving Duncan Hunter as a recent example).
Nope
Sorry, what?
One can’t oversee itself. That’s not oversight
The House is a large body. They’ve demonstrated themselves capable of investigating their own.

But I guess you decided to ignore the rest of the post where I said the DoJ has oversight of Congressmembers as well.
One can’t oversee itself
The DoJ is not a part of Congress. Is it?
 
He's putting out fake information in an attempt to bolster his illegitimate case for impeachment.

Its not about the truth its about spinning a narrative to turn public opinion against the president. Unless Dem's can win public support for impeachment its going to blow up in their face.
 
One can’t oversee itself. That’s not oversight
The House is a large body. They’ve demonstrated themselves capable of investigating their own.

But I guess you decided to ignore the rest of the post where I said the DoJ has oversight of Congressmembers as well.
One can’t oversee itself
The DoJ is not a part of Congress. Is it?
They don’t have oversight
 
QUOTE="BluesLegend, post: 23616217, member: 51009"]
He's putting out fake information in an attempt to bolster his illegitimate case for impeachment.

Its not about the truth its about spinning a narrative to turn public opinion against the president. Unless Dem's can win public support for impeachment its going to blow up in their face.[/QUOTE]
^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^
 
Sorry, what?
One can’t oversee itself. That’s not oversight
The House is a large body. They’ve demonstrated themselves capable of investigating their own.

But I guess you decided to ignore the rest of the post where I said the DoJ has oversight of Congressmembers as well.
One can’t oversee itself
The DoJ is not a part of Congress. Is it?
They don’t have oversight
They prosecute members of Congress all the time. Don’t they?
 

Forum List

Back
Top