Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If 2 men or 2 women want to get married, fine whatever, I am even ok with people who want multiple husbands and wives as long as its consentual, I don't give a fuck.
Oh, I know exactly why Christians don't accept homosexuality. Once you remove all the smoke and mirror logical fallacies they throw up to hide their true motivations, it comes down to simple hate. Their opinion is that God Hates Fags.
The reason civil unions aren't good enough is because that does not make them equal. Gay marriage will not be equal until it is recognized by the federal government and in every state of the union.
No....true Christians DO NOT think God hates "fags". God doesn't hate anyone. That's idiots like the ones that attend the Westboro Church....they call themselves christians, but they're full of lies and hate. I don't hate gays (i hate the word fags tho!)....i just don't agree with their lifestyle. A sin is a sin...all sins are equal in Gods eyes. There's not one person on earth that doesn't sin in some way. God hates the sin, but loves the sinner.
Like I said. It comes down to simple hate. You see homosexuality as something evil, and hate it.
Don't get me wrong. I very much appreciate the directness and honesty. At least you don't try to cover it up.
God and Adam were "walking around in the nude" ??
What a moronic asswipe.
Well, Eve did not give Adam the apple to eat. When Adam ate the apple, he understood he was naked. Therefore, before Eve, Adam was in the nude. So, before the apple and before Eve: Adam was in the nude. Recall, when Adam and Eve ate the apple, they hid from God because they were naked. It says they understood that God was walking in the Garden of Eden. Ok, if God had Adam nude, would not Adam say, hey God, you got that on you and I stand around without anything on. So, both God and Adam before Eve were walking around in the nude.
Maybe the reason Eve was made the evil woman to give Adam the apple and Adam wanted to cover up his junk. Maybe God was upset that he could no longer see Adams junk. In that case, why as a Christian do you have a problem with same sex couples? God was a man and he could see Adams junk, so why have a problem with gay people is hard to understand.
As with everything, the hypocritical Peeping Tom rw's want to pass lots and lots of laws to control the personal and private lives of others.
While these same "family values" rw's are preaching against same sex marriage, they're giving The Newt a standing ovation for refusing to take responsibility for his own lying, cheating philandering. AND, not one of the other Family Values Clown Candidates on the stage last night. When The Newt blamed the "elite media" and Barack Obama for his own lies and cheating, the crowd went wild.
The rw's really need to get their noses out of other people's business and take care of their own.
For a change.
As with everything, the hypocritical Peeping Tom rw's want to pass lots and lots of laws to control the personal and private lives of others.
While these same "family values" rw's are preaching against same sex marriage, they're giving The Newt a standing ovation for refusing to take responsibility for his own lying, cheating philandering. AND, not one of the other Family Values Clown Candidates on the stage last night. When The Newt blamed the "elite media" and Barack Obama for his own lies and cheating, the crowd went wild.
The rw's really need to get their noses out of other people's business and take care of their own.
For a change.
If 2 men or 2 women want to get married, fine whatever, I am even ok with people who want multiple husbands and wives as long as its consentual, I don't give a fuck.
The problem with polygamy is that is inevitably results in a society of one man, multiple women. You don't see women marrying multiple men.
And so women become virtual slaves, and the mathematical reality leads to the ratio of men to available women to men becoming less and less, and so female children end up being forced into marriage and the men become pedophiles.
At the beginning of this topic, I said:
Can I make a prediction right now?
Even though I am making this post for all to see, I predict someone will compare homosexuality to pedophilia and/or bestiality before the topic runs its full course.
And now...
I don't have a problem with same-sex couples. You can marry a horse, for all I give a fuck. It just isn't happening in my church (Roman Catholic) - so, shove it, asswipe.
TA-DAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
That didn't take long.
would you have preferred he said "marry a robber doll"?
The Bible tells us a marriage is between and Man and a Woman, and they'll become ONE. As far as i know, i never read in the bible anything about a black man/white woman, or visa versa, not being able to marry. It's still a Man and Woman. Homosexuality is condemned in the Bible. There's no question about it, although many want to overlook that part and re-word what's said to their liking. No matter what anyone thinks, it doesn't change the fact that it's considered a sin.
Being a witch was called a sin. You could be killed. Now if you want to be a witch, it is now called a religion. What we say is a sin in say the tenth century, is not a sin today. Do you charge interest on a loan, oh well, in the past that was a sin? Can I burn you?
As far as i know being a witch is still a sin....the Bible teaches against witchcraft, and as long as its in the Bible that it's a sin, then it still is. Being burned at the stake for the sin was wrong though, it's up to God to punish the sinner, not us. I think we just got more civilized and people realized it wasn't our job to eliminate the world of sinners.
Witchcraft probably is a religion, but not one of God.
LMAO! Yeah no kidding, anyone who has the balls big enough to take on more than 1 wife should have at it.
It works quite well if the man has the right to beat his wives and in polygamous cultures they do.
huh?
You mean only in polygamous cultures?
Jeez....I didnt realize. I gots me some 'splainin to do.
Same sex relationships won't hurt anyone. It is only when this kind of abnormality is accepted as normal behavior that it becomes toxic. When it requires that others change their opinions and adjust their own activities, that's what makes it wrong.
Oh, I know exactly why Christians don't accept homosexuality. Once you remove all the smoke and mirror logical fallacies they throw up to hide their true motivations, it comes down to simple hate. Their opinion is that God Hates Fags.
The reason civil unions aren't good enough is because that does not make them equal. Gay marriage will not be equal until it is recognized by the federal government and in every state of the union.
No....true Christians DO NOT think God hates "fags". God doesn't hate anyone. That's idiots like the ones that attend the Westboro Church....they call themselves christians, but they're full of lies and hate. I don't hate gays (i hate the word fags tho!)....i just don't agree with their lifestyle. A sin is a sin...all sins are equal in Gods eyes. There's not one person on earth that doesn't sin in some way. God hates the sin, but loves the sinner.
Like I said. It comes down to simple hate. You see homosexuality as something evil, and hate it.
Don't get me wrong. I very much appreciate the directness and honesty. At least you don't try to cover it up.
At the beginning of this topic, I said:
And now...
TA-DAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
That didn't take long.
would you have preferred he said "marry a robber doll"?
I would prefer you and he stop using logical fallacies to justify your prejudice.
As with everything, the hypocritical Peeping Tom rw's want to pass lots and lots of laws to control the personal and private lives of others.
While these same "family values" rw's are preaching against same sex marriage, they're giving The Newt a standing ovation for refusing to take responsibility for his own lying, cheating philandering. AND, not one of the other Family Values Clown Candidates on the stage last night. When The Newt blamed the "elite media" and Barack Obama for his own lies and cheating, the crowd went wild.
The rw's really need to get their noses out of other people's business and take care of their own.
For a change.
Oh really? The RW aren't the ones who stuck their noses into Newt's sex life now were they? I think it was libtards who did that.
As with everything, the hypocritical Peeping Tom rw's want to pass lots and lots of laws to control the personal and private lives of others.
While these same "family values" rw's are preaching against same sex marriage, they're giving The Newt a standing ovation for refusing to take responsibility for his own lying, cheating philandering. AND, not one of the other Family Values Clown Candidates on the stage last night. When The Newt blamed the "elite media" and Barack Obama for his own lies and cheating, the crowd went wild.
The rw's really need to get their noses out of other people's business and take care of their own.
For a change.
But you're OK with a blow job in the Oval Office, huh asswipe?
it was meant to be a joke.It works quite well if the man has the right to beat his wives and in polygamous cultures they do.
huh?
You mean only in polygamous cultures?
Jeez....I didnt realize. I gots me some 'splainin to do.
Ovbviously I did not mean that wife beating was present ONLY in polygamous cultures and NEVER exist in cultures that are not polygamous.
Polygamous cultures have corporal discipline of a wife a matter of legal right. This right exists in cultures that are not polygamous too. Wife beating exists in all cultures, although it is not a legal right in all of them.
Did you know it is possible to be okay with someone being in a loving relationship with another human being that causes no one any harm, and at the same time being against someone violating a vow they made to their spouse?
As with everything, the hypocritical Peeping Tom rw's want to pass lots and lots of laws to control the personal and private lives of others.
While these same "family values" rw's are preaching against same sex marriage, they're giving The Newt a standing ovation for refusing to take responsibility for his own lying, cheating philandering. AND, not one of the other Family Values Clown Candidates on the stage last night. When The Newt blamed the "elite media" and Barack Obama for his own lies and cheating, the crowd went wild.
The rw's really need to get their noses out of other people's business and take care of their own.
For a change.
But you're OK with a blow job in the Oval Office, huh asswipe?
Did you know it is possible to be okay with someone being in a loving relationship with another human being that causes no one any harm, and at the same time being against someone cheating on their spouse?
Yeah! It really is possible! Amazing, huh?
Guess which relationship does more damage to the institution of marriage.
would you have preferred he said "marry a robber doll"?
I would prefer you and he stop using logical fallacies to justify your prejudice.
OK.
You win.
I support gay marriage.
Now....I am curious.....what logical fallcies did I use to justify my prejudice?
I ask becuase I am confused seeing as I have supported gay marriage since the day it became a public debate....and been quite open about it on this forum.
But you're OK with a blow job in the Oval Office, huh asswipe?
Did you know it is possible to be okay with someone being in a loving relationship with another human being that causes no one any harm, and at the same time being against someone cheating on their spouse?
Yeah! It really is possible! Amazing, huh?
Guess which relationship does more damage to the institution of marriage.
Sorry Bro...
Pathetic response.
Did not the Christian right say the same about a black man and a white woman was not natural? Being in the south, I understand the problems about the illegal backing of marriage between a black man and a white woman. When you see a light skin black person, you can say his or her grandparents; or, great grandparents, were not married because his or her grandparents or great grandparents were white and black. Since they could not get married, his parents and he or she have a background that marriage is less important: because marriage was illegal to his family history.
The right says a black man does not have the same level of being in a married state. Still, was not that background to accept marriage was given to him because of the right in the past refused his family history to be married?
Look, there is going to be same sex couples, married or unmarried. They are going to have with some, children from a past marriage. Or in the case with the right, a lesbian woman was rapped and if the right gets what they want – to have a child because abortion was made illegal.
If we say that black men or black women have a less importance with marriage, as they can say they can prove a marriage was illegal for them. What will the children of a same sex marriage will say in decades to come. With the right pointing out that marriage was illegal, you only make the next generation have a lower value that marriage is important.
The more the right says some can be married and some can be married, the right just makes marriage less important to the children that comes from these unions.
I don't accept interracial marriage also. I feel the blacks should never marry outside the black race. I feel black people should never accept homosexual marriage.
Both acts are immoral and sinful. We as black people must resist the white liberal homosexual agenda.
YOU ARE NOT THE SPOKESMAN FOR THE BLACK RACE, SHUT THE FUCK UP!
