RWs: why do you think it is harmful to vote democrat over republican?

[Billy000]

I want specific examples. No hyperbole. No stereotypes. What specific policies do you not like?

 

[S.J.]

Wealth redistribution (for starters).

 

[Wyatt earp]

Simple I vote my wallet.and don't want to pay $10 bucks for a pack of smokes, or rent a kennel for $400 bucks a month in someone's living room.


Who has a better life? $15 hour in San Francisco?or $7.25 hour in South Carolina?

.

 

[Billy000]

Wealth redistribution (for starters).

Obama said that phrase like once but it means absolutely nothing. No policies he is pushing has anything to do with it whatsoever. The same goes for any democrat.

 

[DarkFury]

Immigration

 

[S.J.]

Wealth redistribution (for starters).

Obama said that phrase like once but it means absolutely nothing. No policies he is pushing has anything to do with it whatsoever. The same goes for any democrat.

First of all, he doesn't have to use the phrase, his policies sure as hell reflect it though. And you don't think forcing people who work to pay to support people who DON'T work, wealth redistribution? Use your head, man.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Wealth redistribution (for starters).

Obama said that phrase like once but it means absolutely nothing. No policies he is pushing has anything to do with it whatsoever. The same goes for any democrat.

The entire existence of the Democratic Party going back to FDR has been predicated on envy, jealousy, and greed.

 

[Billy000]

Wealth redistribution (for starters).

Obama said that phrase like once but it means absolutely nothing. No policies he is pushing has anything to do with it whatsoever. The same goes for any democrat.

First of all, he doesn't have to use the phrase, his policies sure as hell reflect it though. And you don't think forcing people who work to pay to support people who DON'T work, wealth redistribution? Use your head, man.

What programs are you referring to exactly? People on food stamps, for instance, do have jobs. They make on average, per household, $766 per month. They get $133 per month. 83% of households on food stamps have at least one child living there. A person making 50,000 per year contributed .10 cents per day in revenue to the program. That isn't wealth distribution.

 

[Billy000]

Wealth redistribution (for starters).

Obama said that phrase like once but it means absolutely nothing. No policies he is pushing has anything to do with it whatsoever. The same goes for any democrat.

The entire existence of the Democratic Party going back to FDR has been predicated on envy, jealousy, and greed.

Based on...what? What policies? What quotes?

 

[ninja007]

high taxes, no borders, gay marraige, abortion, common core, too easy on criminals, want to take away guns, take away Christianity in schools, churches, court rooms, dumb on the seriousness of isis and islam, military spending cuts, what else?

 

[S.J.]

Wealth redistribution (for starters).

Obama said that phrase like once but it means absolutely nothing. No policies he is pushing has anything to do with it whatsoever. The same goes for any democrat.

First of all, he doesn't have to use the phrase, his policies sure as hell reflect it though. And you don't think forcing people who work to pay to support people who DON'T work, wealth redistribution? Use your head, man.

What programs are you referring to exactly? People on food stamps, for instance, do have jobs. They make on average, per household, $766 per month. They get $133 per month. 83% of households on food stamps have at least one child living there. A person making 50,000 per year contributed .10 cents per day in revenue to the program. That isn't wealth distribution.

Link?

 

[ninja007]

climate change, emission standards, minimum wage....

 

[Billy000]

Wealth redistribution (for starters).

Obama said that phrase like once but it means absolutely nothing. No policies he is pushing has anything to do with it whatsoever. The same goes for any democrat.

First of all, he doesn't have to use the phrase, his policies sure as hell reflect it though. And you don't think forcing people who work to pay to support people who DON'T work, wealth redistribution? Use your head, man.

What programs are you referring to exactly? People on food stamps, for instance, do have jobs. They make on average, per household, $766 per month. They get $133 per month. 83% of households on food stamps have at least one child living there. A person making 50,000 per year contributed .10 cents per day in revenue to the program. That isn't wealth distribution.

Link?

https://schakowsky.house.gov/images/stories/snap_and_republicans.pdf

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Wealth redistribution (for starters).

Obama said that phrase like once but it means absolutely nothing. No policies he is pushing has anything to do with it whatsoever. The same goes for any democrat.

Ok Billy, just explain how Obama Care guarantees health coverage now for people who couldn't afford it before, since wealth distribution plays no part.

 

[Billy000]

Wealth redistribution (for starters).

Obama said that phrase like once but it means absolutely nothing. No policies he is pushing has anything to do with it whatsoever. The same goes for any democrat.

Ok Billy, just explain how Obama Care guarantees health coverage now for people who couldn't afford it before, since wealth distribution plays no part.

I don't get it. Do you think Medicare and Medicaid are examples of wealth distribution than?

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Wealth redistribution (for starters).

Obama said that phrase like once but it means absolutely nothing. No policies he is pushing has anything to do with it whatsoever. The same goes for any democrat.

Ok Billy, just explain how Obama Care guarantees health coverage now for people who couldn't afford it before, since wealth distribution plays no part.

I don't get it. Do you think Medicare and Medicaid are examples of wealth distribution than?

Do the people who get the benefits from Medicare and Medicaid pay all the cost of those benefits? If they do, then no, there is no,wealth distribution, But if they don't, well ...where does the money come from?

 

[S.J.]

Wealth redistribution (for starters).

Obama said that phrase like once but it means absolutely nothing. No policies he is pushing has anything to do with it whatsoever. The same goes for any democrat.

First of all, he doesn't have to use the phrase, his policies sure as hell reflect it though. And you don't think forcing people who work to pay to support people who DON'T work, wealth redistribution? Use your head, man.

What programs are you referring to exactly? People on food stamps, for instance, do have jobs. They make on average, per household, $766 per month. They get $133 per month. 83% of households on food stamps have at least one child living there. A person making 50,000 per year contributed .10 cents per day in revenue to the program. That isn't wealth distribution.

Link?

https://schakowsky.house.gov/images/stories/snap_and_republicans.pdf

Anything that isn't voluntary is forced. Wealth redistribution.

 

[Billy000]

Wealth redistribution (for starters).

Obama said that phrase like once but it means absolutely nothing. No policies he is pushing has anything to do with it whatsoever. The same goes for any democrat.

Ok Billy, just explain how Obama Care guarantees health coverage now for people who couldn't afford it before, since wealth distribution plays no part.

I don't get it. Do you think Medicare and Medicaid are examples of wealth distribution than?

Do the people who get the benefits from Medicare and Medicaid pay all the cost of those benefits? If they do, then no, there is no,wealth distribution, But if they don't, well ...where does the money come from?

In ObamaCare's case, those people still pay a private insurance premium.