Russia suffers from a security deficit in relations with NATO

Discussion in 'Europe' started by Casper, Nov 24, 2010.

  1. Casper
    Offline

    Casper Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2010
    Messages:
    81
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +5
    Joint efforts by Russia and the EU or Russia and NATO to mediate specific conflicts in the region could help build up mutual trust, which is the cornerstone of any partnership.

    Valdai Club’s expert Dmitri Trenin answers on most daring question:

    “Do you see Russia as a full member of the North Atlantic alliance in the medium term?”

    No, I don’t. And there are two important reasons why I don’t. First, I do not expect Russia to join NATO, and second, I do not support this idea because Russia’s accession to the alliance would fuel tensions. These tensions won’t go away. They will come out at some other level.

    NATO has an unofficial leader; for Russia to join NATO would mean to lose its strategic independence, which is highly important for our country. Since this is unacceptable, the inevitable haggling with the United States would continue, and this wouldn’t do anyone any good. Essentially Russia’s membership in NATO would turn the alliance into another OSCE with the same format of peaceful coexistence.

    China would also be a problem, because Russia’s membership in NATO would seem to the Chinese like encirclement. This would inevitably cause tension in Russia-China relations, the last thing Russia needs, considering that the alliance would not be willing or able to protect the Russian-Chinese border. By joining NATO, Russia would be on a potential collision course with China, something Russia wouldn’t want to risk.

    To summarize, Russia:
    a) must maintain its strategic independence in any and all partnerships, be it with NATO or other partners;
    b) must not turn NATO into another OSCE; and
    c) shouldn’t provoke China.


    Full version of his interview was published on valdaiclub.com
     
  2. waltky
    Offline

    waltky Wise ol' monkey Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    20,873
    Thanks Received:
    1,791
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Okolona, KY
    Ratings:
    +3,884
    Don't count the Russian bear out quite yet...
    :confused:
    With Russia's $650 billion rearmament plan, the bear sharpens its teeth
    February 28, 2011 - If Russia can reduce reliance on its aging Soviet-era nuclear missile deterrent, analysts say it could create a 'whole new ball game.'
     
  3. Ropey
    Offline

    Ropey To Life! Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,172
    Thanks Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    1,150
    Location:
    On the water, away from the warf rats.
    Ratings:
    +7,990
    Conventional forces spending is a good thing for Russia. They see the need for conventional arms in their arena.

    They are so far behind the curve in nuclear deterrents that I doubt America will feel worried on this account.
     
  4. LibocalypseNow
    Offline

    LibocalypseNow Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    12,337
    Thanks Received:
    1,356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,357
    Russia is currently controlled by conniving corrupt Ex-KGB cretins. They cannot be trusted as long as this is the case. Someday things will change in Russia though. Once the old corrupt Ex-KGB cretins die off,Russia will be reborn. That time is still a long way off though. It would be a big mistake trusting anything Russia says or does at this point. One day this will change but that day isn't here yet.
     

Share This Page