- Thread starter
- #21
Is it not obvious that you could make exactly the same commentary now about Rush? Speaking of "waste of life"... what a hater. And I don't remember Cobain "flaunting" his habit.
His entire inner circle, family & friends knew he was a major drug addict addicted to heroin. For the everyday fan it was quite obvious that he was wasted every time he hit the stage or a public venue, unless you want to ignore the obvious signs.
He made several attempts to kick it. Obviously, he was a psychological wreck, not fit for this world, and not much of a role model, but the world chose him because of his music, and to this day, I consider Nevermind one of the most significant contributions to pop music in the nineties (say what you will...).
Younger fans will also be attracted to musicians who lead their lives with reckless abandon. I think everyone knows that younger kids want to be just like their favorite rock stars, and I personally don't want my son idolizing someone who is a heroin addict.
I don't think "stars" have any more responsibility to "live clean" than any of the rest of us. Some of us succumb, and others don't. Just a fact of life. How many of the great people in the world had less attractive characteristics that made them in restospect seem less than perfect? How many of us are perfect?
I think anyone that is dealing with children and teenagers on a daily basis does have a responsibility. How many fans do you think between the ages of 12-21 went to see him while he was wasted? He crossed the line when he came into the public eye while under the influence.
Cobain received the ire of Rush and now of you, jimnyc, more because he was a representative of a counter culture, not for his drug addiction. Just out of curiosity, how do you feel about John Lennon?
I personally felt no pain over the loss of John Lennon, and will feel even less when Yoko meats her maker!
I don't necessarily think Rush should have resigned either, but his commentary was not appropriate. Making race an issue is not a football comentators job, which leads me to believe ESPN should never have hired him in the first place.
He didn't make it an "issue", he commented on it. It's extremely saddening to think a white man can no longer even mention the word "black" anymore without fear of losing his job. We can talk about the success stories of black NFL head coaches, but not players in the same manner? It's written about and spoken about almost daily the dealings black coaches have to put up with when interviewing for a head coach job. They are clearly receiving preferential treatment in the interview process, and that's now a league rule! (See Mariucci and Detroit)
I mean, what did they expect from this guy? Football comentary? "McNabb is overrated" would have more than sufficed. In any case, the worst one can say about McNabb is that he's above average. He's no miracle worker. In making a commentary like that, Rush says more about himself than about McNabb.
If he left it at that it wouldn't have explained why he gets so much media exposure throughout the nation. Does he get that exposure because he is "mediocre"?
Concerning his commentaries about Cobain, Rush reveals that he is a hypocrite (if it turns out that his prescription addiction is more than just a rumor...), and that should cost him the respect of all of you.
Time will tell... Kind of strange these stories get released when someone is suddenly in the limelight (just like the flood of Schwarzenneger complaints coming out this week).