Rules For Traditionals: How People In Wedding Trades Can Defend Themselves

There is no known tenet of any established religion that commands its followers to refuse to do business with homosexuals.

It's a personal belief being disguised as a religious belief to allow some people's personal bigotry to try to circumvent the laws of the land.
No one has refused to do business with homosexuals. In every case the complaining homosexuals had already been customers for years.

These business people refused to commit a oersonal sin because they were requested to commit that sin by those homosexuals.

What sin were business people being asked to commit?

I am really curious- we know that adultery is a sin- if a Christian bakes a cake for a couple getting married who are committing adultery- is the Baker committing a sin?

If they're getting married and committing adultery, that is a CRIME. Last time I checked, bigamy is not legal.

Adultery is not a crime, moron, and gay marriage wasn't legal until judges ruled otherwise. They can just as easily rule that bigamy is not a crime.
You are one funny dude bripat. You call someone a moron while you make a stupid statement. Adultery is still a crime in 21 states and depending on the circumstances, can be a crime in the military.

When has anyone ever been arrested for adultery?
 
A wedding cake. Something so simple, something part and parcel of a bakerie's menu. Something provided without a political thought to every heterosexual couple. But, given the advent of marriage equality,...

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

No matter how many times you regurgitate that, it is still wrong!

ROFL! Only a libturd could claim that reality is "wrong."
Actually, reality in thirty seven states says it's wrong. And soon, the law of the land for the entire nation will say it's wrong too.

A law saying "pi = 3.5" doesn't make it true.
 
Reread what I posted. Comprehend it. Then think REALLY, REALLY HARD about why you're stupid.

But first, you need to look up "adultery" in a dictionary.

It's not a crime, moron. Think about that.

Actually, laws against it ARE still on the books in some states...but had you actually READ and UNDERSTOOD what I posted, you would understand that adultery being legal or not has no bearing on what I posted.

(Now...will you realize why you look stupid, or double down on idiocy...?)
 
Reread what I posted. Comprehend it. Then think REALLY, REALLY HARD about why you're stupid.

But first, you need to look up "adultery" in a dictionary.

It's not a crime, moron. Think about that.

Actually, laws against it ARE still on the books in some states...but had you actually READ and UNDERSTOOD what I posted, you would understand that adultery being legal or not has no bearing on what I posted.

(Now...will you realize why you look stupid, or double down on idiocy...?)
?
 
No one has refused to do business with homosexuals. In every case the complaining homosexuals had already been customers for years.

These business people refused to commit a oersonal sin because they were requested to commit that sin by those homosexuals.

What sin were business people being asked to commit?

I am really curious- we know that adultery is a sin- if a Christian bakes a cake for a couple getting married who are committing adultery- is the Baker committing a sin?

If they're getting married and committing adultery, that is a CRIME. Last time I checked, bigamy is not legal.

Adultery is not a crime, moron, and gay marriage wasn't legal until judges ruled otherwise. They can just as easily rule that bigamy is not a crime.
You are one funny dude bripat. You call someone a moron while you make a stupid statement. Adultery is still a crime in 21 states and depending on the circumstances, can be a crime in the military.

When has anyone ever been arrested for adultery?
2015 Utah, 2014 Georgia, 2010 New York, 2010 Mississippi, 1990 Connecticut (Four arrested)
 
No one has refused to do business with homosexuals. In every case the complaining homosexuals had already been customers for years.

These business people refused to commit a oersonal sin because they were requested to commit that sin by those homosexuals.

What sin were business people being asked to commit?

I am really curious- we know that adultery is a sin- if a Christian bakes a cake for a couple getting married who are committing adultery- is the Baker committing a sin?

If they're getting married and committing adultery, that is a CRIME. Last time I checked, bigamy is not legal.

Adultery is not a crime, moron, and gay marriage wasn't legal until judges ruled otherwise. They can just as easily rule that bigamy is not a crime.
You are one funny dude bripat. You call someone a moron while you make a stupid statement. Adultery is still a crime in 21 states and depending on the circumstances, can be a crime in the military.

When has anyone ever been arrested for adultery?

Are crimes always associated with jail time or arrest? Do you get arrested if you speed?

86ed3b9c-9954-4aee-8e83-c539570a0536-adult1.png


Although adultery is a misdemeanor in most of the states with laws against it, some — including Michigan and Wisconsin — categorize the offense as a felony.

Punishments vary widely by state. In Maryland, the penalty is a paltry $10 fine. But in Massachusetts, an adulterer could face up to three years in jail.

In 2003, the Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence v. Texas that sexual activity between consenting adults is legal, and state laws banning homosexual sodomy are unconstitutional.

Whether the Lawrence case applies to anti-adultery laws remains "an open question," Murray says, and the continued existence of these laws "raise very important privacy issues."​

In which states is cheating on your spouse illegal?
 
A wedding cake. Something so simple, something part and parcel of a bakerie's menu. Something provided without a political thought to every heterosexual couple. But, given the advent of marriage equality,...

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

No matter how many times you regurgitate that, it is still wrong!

ROFL! Only a libturd could claim that reality is "wrong."
Actually, reality in thirty seven states says it's wrong. And soon, the law of the land for the entire nation will say it's wrong too.

A law saying "pi = 3.5" doesn't make it true.
Marriage, in the eyes of the state, is a civil contract.

Churches may sanctify marriages, but the state licenses the marriage. So, in the eyes of thirty seven states, marriage is the Union of two consenting adults where no previous next of kin relationships exists.
 
What sin were business people being asked to commit?

I am really curious- we know that adultery is a sin- if a Christian bakes a cake for a couple getting married who are committing adultery- is the Baker committing a sin?

If they're getting married and committing adultery, that is a CRIME. Last time I checked, bigamy is not legal.

Adultery is not a crime, moron, and gay marriage wasn't legal until judges ruled otherwise. They can just as easily rule that bigamy is not a crime.
You are one funny dude bripat. You call someone a moron while you make a stupid statement. Adultery is still a crime in 21 states and depending on the circumstances, can be a crime in the military.

When has anyone ever been arrested for adultery?
2015 Utah, 2014 Georgia, 2010 New York, 2010 Mississippi, 1990 Connecticut (Four arrested)

Please provide a reference.
 
A business owner can lose his or her livelihood for adhering to religious belief yet as a customer you must honor and respect a clerk's religious beliefs that prevent them from handling pork and alcohol products??
 
the people better start waking up and standing up to this or continue to get beat down and lose your livelihoods.

SNIP;
People who believe it a sacrilege to participate in a gay wedding can keep themselves from being persecuted out of business with some savvy marketing.
By Bruce Takawani

“Sweet Cakes” bakery in Gresham, Oregon, could soon be hit with state-imposed fines of up to $150,000, a threat that goes far beyond stigma and ends up threatening its owners’ ability to practice their trade.
The Federal Bureau of Cakes

That something called the “Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries” could impose such a fine, bankrupt the bakery owners, and pay the award directly to the supposedly wounded “plaintiffs” is a development that those of us who grew up hearing tales of religious persecution and ideological purification behind the “iron curtain” can barely grasp is happening in America during our lifetimes.

Options for Conscientious Objectors

ALL of it here:
How People In Wedding Trades Can Defend Themselves
Why not just go, not-for-profit, if alleged capitalists have ideological excuses to be bad capitalists.
 
The article in the link in the OP was written by gays. No Christian must ever participate in a gay wedding. It isn't enough to advertise that you specialize in normal weddings but then serve gays when they demand it "to protect yourself legally" (read the whole article). The punishment from Jude 1 doesn't have gray areas. You either refuse to enable a cultural homosexual takeover (using the core of all culture-marriage) or you spend eternity in the Pit of Fire.
 
The article in the link in the OP was written by gays. No Christian must ever participate in a gay wedding. It isn't enough to advertise that you specialize in normal weddings but then serve gays when they demand it "to protect yourself legally" (read the whole article). The punishment from Jude 1 doesn't have gray areas. You either refuse to enable a cultural homosexual takeover (using the core of all culture-marriage) or you spend eternity in the Pit of Fire.
Why not just go, not-for-profit, if alleged capitalists have ideological excuses to be bad capitalists.
 
The article in the link in the OP was written by gays. No Christian must ever participate in a gay wedding. It isn't enough to advertise that you specialize in normal weddings but then serve gays when they demand it "to protect yourself legally" (read the whole article). The punishment from Jude 1 doesn't have gray areas. You either refuse to enable a cultural homosexual takeover (using the core of all culture-marriage) or you spend eternity in the Pit of Fire.
I disagree. True Christians adhere to the teachings of Christ. Wedding vendors do not participate in wedding ceremonies. Baking, photographing, catering are not sacramental rites or rituals. They are the services such vendors are in business for.

Perhaps, if a vendor fears for the status of their immortal soul by baking wedding cakes, they should morally vet each and every customer to assure no sinners ask for their services. Should 'Christian' vendors provide a wedding cake for a adulterer? What if a customer failed to remember the sabbath and keep it holy? Maybe there is a customer who regularly takes the Lord's name in vain. These are sins enumerated in the Ten Commandments, unlike homosexuality.

Face it. Wedding vendors who refuse to provide the exact same service to homosexual couples as they provide for heterosexual couples are afraid of marriage equality. Why? Ignorance, suspicion, reliance on wicked stereotypes, open bigotry. Is that the way Christ commanded us to treat one another?
 
Last edited:
A wedding cake. Something so simple, something part and parcel of a bakerie's menu. Something provided without a political thought to every heterosexual couple. But, given the advent of marriage equality,...

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

No matter how many times you regurgitate that, it is still wrong!

ROFL! Only a libturd could claim that reality is "wrong."
Actually, reality in thirty seven states says it's wrong. And soon, the law of the land for the entire nation will say it's wrong too.

A law saying "pi = 3.5" doesn't make it true.
That's correct, but if that's the law either follow it or don't bitch when you get nailed Bripiss.
 
Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

No matter how many times you regurgitate that, it is still wrong!

ROFL! Only a libturd could claim that reality is "wrong."
Actually, reality in thirty seven states says it's wrong. And soon, the law of the land for the entire nation will say it's wrong too.

A law saying "pi = 3.5" doesn't make it true.
Marriage, in the eyes of the state, is a civil contract.

Churches may sanctify marriages, but the state licenses the marriage. So, in the eyes of thirty seven states, marriage is the Union of two consenting adults where no previous next of kin relationships exists.
Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

No matter how many times you regurgitate that, it is still wrong!

ROFL! Only a libturd could claim that reality is "wrong."
Actually, reality in thirty seven states says it's wrong. And soon, the law of the land for the entire nation will say it's wrong too.

A law saying "pi = 3.5" doesn't make it true.
Marriage, in the eyes of the state, is a civil contract.

Churches may sanctify marriages, but the state licenses the marriage. So, in the eyes of thirty seven states, marriage is the Union of two consenting adults where no previous next of kin relationships exists.

Marriage, is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

 
No matter how many times you regurgitate that, it is still wrong!

ROFL! Only a libturd could claim that reality is "wrong."
Actually, reality in thirty seven states says it's wrong. And soon, the law of the land for the entire nation will say it's wrong too.

A law saying "pi = 3.5" doesn't make it true.
Marriage, in the eyes of the state, is a civil contract.

Churches may sanctify marriages, but the state licenses the marriage. So, in the eyes of thirty seven states, marriage is the Union of two consenting adults where no previous next of kin relationships exists.
No matter how many times you regurgitate that, it is still wrong!

ROFL! Only a libturd could claim that reality is "wrong."
Actually, reality in thirty seven states says it's wrong. And soon, the law of the land for the entire nation will say it's wrong too.

A law saying "pi = 3.5" doesn't make it true.
Marriage, in the eyes of the state, is a civil contract.

Churches may sanctify marriages, but the state licenses the marriage. So, in the eyes of thirty seven states, marriage is the Union of two consenting adults where no previous next of kin relationships exists.

Marriage, is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.
That argument fails to refute the law, does it. I fact, that argument only serves to bolster your interpretation.
 

Forum List

Back
Top