ChrisL
Diamond Member
And how is a ladies room not a 'full and complete accommodation'?
And how was black only restrooms not a "full and compete accomodation?
Can I take it with your response being a question that you have no answer?
If you can't demonstrate a lack of 'full and complete accommodation', you can hardly claim a PA violation has occurred.
Which might explain why your pseudo-legal babble about bathrooms has never played out in the real world. And a ladies room has never been found to be a violation of any PA law in any state.
Do you ever get tired of being perfectly wrong?
So a gym could legally have equal accomodations for Blacks, seperate from Whites and not be sued for discrimination?
How's that work in the real world?
And another question with a question. I've apparently got you stumped cold:
How is a ladies room not a 'full and complete accommodation'. Your answer is......jack shit. Avoidance. Evasion.
So riddle me this, batman......if gendered bathrooms are the PA violation that you imagine, how do you explain that no state, no court, no PA board has ever found your claim to be true, nor ruled that a gendered bathroom constitutes a PA violation?
Laughing......once again the bug of your pseudo-legal gibberish hits the windshield of reality.
Have the been challenged?
When was the first Baker sued for refusing to make a gay marriage wedding cake?
How is a Black only restroom not full acommodation?
Laughing my ass off.
You are the one who is being laughed at. You are making a complete fool of yourself. You display a very poor understanding of the laws.