right wing cons want to start a war with a billion Muslims

[Borillar]

I am with the OP, Obama is trying to keep American men off the ground , those like Cheney who did everything he could not to serve in the Vietnam war (what 4 deferments) and some others like him had no problem sending men to Iraq. Let the people in the ME fight it out.

Four deferments.

I think he has also had four major heart surgeries, maybe even four artificial hearts.

I would not have wanted him covering my brother's ass; wheezy guy like that could have been heard a mile away.

Yeah, now that he is an old man with a lump of coal for a heart. Don't believe any of his deferments were health related back when he was a young man. He just had "other priorities" than serving his country during time of war.

 

[nodoginnafight]

I have seen posts on these boards that advocate that very thing.

No you haven't.

Yes, I have.

You have no proof.

Don't read well, huh?

I read perfectly well.
You have no proof; you know it.

I know (and so do you) that nuking folks is an act of war.

Why would anyone with an IQ above room temperature even try to argue differently?

 

[M14 Shooter]

No you haven't.

Yes, I have.

You have no proof.

Don't read well, huh?

I read perfectly well.
You have no proof; you know it.

I know (and so do you) that nuking folks is an act of war.

Genocide can exist w/o war; the two are not necessarily related.
As I said: You have no proof and you know it.

 

[kaz]

Not just a war with ISIS and Al Qaeda, the right wing extremists in the U.S. want to declare war on all of Islam. And they rag on Obama for not going along with the idea. Well hey, here's a clue...start that stupid war and then NO MORE OIL! When these moron cons piss off Saudi Arabia and the rest of the oil producers, then not only are we cut off, but so is all of Europe. And then here we go again with another global economic collapse. The most dangerous extremists in the world today is the GOP.

Don't follow the news, do you Poindexter? Jordan and Egypt have been pounding the shit out of ISIS

 

[nodoginnafight]

Yes, I have.

You have no proof.

Don't read well, huh?

I read perfectly well.
You have no proof; you know it.

I know (and so do you) that nuking folks is an act of war.

Genocide can exist w/o war; the two are not necessarily related.
As I said: You have no proof and you know it.

So you contend that nuking 23% of the world's population is NOT an act of war?
Yeah, OK. Run with that - if that's the best you got.

 

[kaz]

Not just a war with ISIS and Al Qaeda, the right wing extremists in the U.S. want to declare war on all of Islam.

This is, of course, a lie.

I have seen posts on these boards that advocate that very thing.

Note that claim is without backup, sort of like your claims liberals and extreme liberals disagree on anything

 

[Uncensored2008]

I am with the OP, Obama is trying to keep American men off the ground , those like Cheney who did everything he could not to serve in the Vietnam war (what 4 deferments) and some others like him had no problem sending men to Iraq. Let the people in the ME fight it out.

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that you're with ISIS?

 

[kaz]

I am with the OP, Obama is trying to keep American men off the ground , those like Cheney who did everything he could not to serve in the Vietnam war (what 4 deferments) and some others like him had no problem sending men to Iraq. Let the people in the ME fight it out.

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that you're with ISIS?

I cheer Jordan and Egypt and their actions, the middle east countries need to take the lead on this

 

[M14 Shooter]

You have no proof.

Don't read well, huh?

I read perfectly well.
You have no proof; you know it.

I know (and so do you) that nuking folks is an act of war.

Genocide can exist w/o war; the two are not necessarily related.
As I said: You have no proof and you know it.

So you contend that nuking 23% of the world's population is NOT an act of war?
Yeah, OK. Run with that - if that's the best you got.

You know that genocide can exist w/o war; the two are not necessarily related.
You refuse to admit it because you know it proves you wrong.

 

[nodoginnafight]

Don't read well, huh?

I read perfectly well.
You have no proof; you know it.

I know (and so do you) that nuking folks is an act of war.

Genocide can exist w/o war; the two are not necessarily related.
As I said: You have no proof and you know it.

So you contend that nuking 23% of the world's population is NOT an act of war?
Yeah, OK. Run with that - if that's the best you got.

You know that genocide can exist w/o war; the two are not necessarily related.
You refuse to admit it because you know it proves you wrong.

And yet Nuclear War exists without war??????

LOL - I'd say nice try - but it really wasn't now was it?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Not just a war with ISIS and Al Qaeda, the right wing extremists in the U.S. want to declare war on all of Islam.

This is, of course, a lie.

I have seen posts on these boards that advocate that very thing.

Note that claim is without backup, sort of like your claims liberals and extreme liberals disagree on anything

Anyone who tells you that the Koran orders Muslims to be violent, and therefore the religion itself is to blame,

and that moderate Muslims are not really Muslims, or else they're just extremists waiting to happen, or anything anyone says in a similar vein -

those are people who want to be at war with Islam.

...and we hear that sort of thing around here and elsewhere all the time.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I read perfectly well.
You have no proof; you know it.

I know (and so do you) that nuking folks is an act of war.

Genocide can exist w/o war; the two are not necessarily related.
As I said: You have no proof and you know it.

So you contend that nuking 23% of the world's population is NOT an act of war?
Yeah, OK. Run with that - if that's the best you got.

You know that genocide can exist w/o war; the two are not necessarily related.
You refuse to admit it because you know it proves you wrong.

And yet Nuclear War exists without war??????
LOL - I'd say nice try - but it really wasn't now was it?

Nothing here changes the fact that you know you are wrong -- you know that genocide does not necessitate war and so advocating for genocide does not in any way necessitate advocacy for war.
You know this, you simply do not have the intellectual honesty to admit it.

And so.. you have no proof; you know it.

 

[nodoginnafight]

I know (and so do you) that nuking folks is an act of war.

Genocide can exist w/o war; the two are not necessarily related.
As I said: You have no proof and you know it.

So you contend that nuking 23% of the world's population is NOT an act of war?
Yeah, OK. Run with that - if that's the best you got.

You know that genocide can exist w/o war; the two are not necessarily related.
You refuse to admit it because you know it proves you wrong.

And yet Nuclear War exists without war??????
LOL - I'd say nice try - but it really wasn't now was it?

Nothing here changes the fact that you know you are wrong -- you know that genocide does not necessitate war and so advocating for genocide does not in any way necessitate advocacy for war.
You know this, you simply do not have the intellectual honesty to admit it.

And so.. you have no proof; you know it.

Nothing here changes the facts - you're wrong and you know it.
The fact you had to change "nuclear war" to "genocide" says it all.
For some reason you have opted for the willful ignorance tactic.
That's your right - enjoy it.

 

[Clementine]

Not just a war with ISIS and Al Qaeda, the right wing extremists in the U.S. want to declare war on all of Islam. And they rag on Obama for not going along with the idea. Well hey, here's a clue...start that stupid war and then NO MORE OIL! When these moron cons piss off Saudi Arabia and the rest of the oil producers, then not only are we cut off, but so is all of Europe. And then here we go again with another global economic collapse. The most dangerous extremists in the world today is the GOP.

You are so full of shit. The right doesn't want to fight all Muslims, just terrorists.

Run along and get your tin foil hat, leftie.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Genocide can exist w/o war; the two are not necessarily related.
As I said: You have no proof and you know it.

So you contend that nuking 23% of the world's population is NOT an act of war?
Yeah, OK. Run with that - if that's the best you got.

You know that genocide can exist w/o war; the two are not necessarily related.
You refuse to admit it because you know it proves you wrong.

And yet Nuclear War exists without war??????
LOL - I'd say nice try - but it really wasn't now was it?

Nothing here changes the fact that you know you are wrong -- you know that genocide does not necessitate war and so advocating for genocide does not in any way necessitate advocacy for war.
You know this, you simply do not have the intellectual honesty to admit it.
And so.. you have no proof; you know it.

Nothing here changes the facts - you're wrong and you know it.
The fact you had to change "nuclear war" to "genocide" says it all.

No one said anything about nuclear war - except you, who refuse to admit that genocide can exist outside war.
You have no proof; you know it.

 

[Clementine]

Not just a war with ISIS and Al Qaeda, the right wing extremists in the U.S. want to declare war on all of Islam. And they rag on Obama for not going along with the idea. Well hey, here's a clue...start that stupid war and then NO MORE OIL! When these moron cons piss off Saudi Arabia and the rest of the oil producers, then not only are we cut off, but so is all of Europe. And then here we go again with another global economic collapse. The most dangerous extremists in the world today is the GOP.

You are so full of shit. The right doesn't want to fight all Muslims, just terrorists.

Run along and get your tin foil hat, leftie.

 

[nodoginnafight]

So you contend that nuking 23% of the world's population is NOT an act of war?
Yeah, OK. Run with that - if that's the best you got.

You know that genocide can exist w/o war; the two are not necessarily related.
You refuse to admit it because you know it proves you wrong.

And yet Nuclear War exists without war??????
LOL - I'd say nice try - but it really wasn't now was it?

Nothing here changes the fact that you know you are wrong -- you know that genocide does not necessitate war and so advocating for genocide does not in any way necessitate advocacy for war.
You know this, you simply do not have the intellectual honesty to admit it.
And so.. you have no proof; you know it.

Nothing here changes the facts - you're wrong and you know it.
The fact you had to change "nuclear war" to "genocide" says it all.

No one said anything about nuclear war - except you, who refuse to admit that genocide can exist outside war.
You have no proof; you know it.

I didn't START the nuclear war thought - that was a right wing extremist confirming something you said doesn't exist.

YOU started substituting genocide, I can only assume become you realized the nuclear war post of the extremist - proved you wrong.

When we used nuclear weapons against Japan - was that an act of genocide or an act of war?

Answer please.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I didn't START the nuclear war thought

You are the only person who has mentioned it.
The post you quoted advocated genocide, not war. -You- equated the two.
You have no proof; you know it

 

[nodoginnafight]

I didn't START the nuclear war thought

You are the only person who has mentioned it.
The post you quoted advocated genocide, not war. -You- equated the two.
You have no proof; you know it

Proven wrong.

Now answer the question that you are trying so hard to avoid:

When the U.S. used nuclear weapons on Japan, was that an act of genocide or an act of war?

Answer please.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I didn't START the nuclear war thought

You are the only person who has mentioned it.
The post you quoted advocated genocide, not war. -You- equated the two.
You have no proof; you know it

Proven wrong.

You have yet to provide proof of anyone on the right wanting to start a war with a billion Muslims.
You did, however, provide proof that someone in the right does want to commit the genocide of a billion Muslims.
As genocide and war are not the same thing, your quote did not prove the claim.
Standing corrected, you may now try again.