- Moderator
- #121
He sounds like that whiny effeminate poster named Protectionist.In 1964 "race" implied several defined races. The US has never been just Black and white. Are you really still trying to defend that stupid claim of yours?I dont see it. Your assumptions are amusing and vaque. Where does it specify only or primarily Black people? Your assumptions are not credible. I asked for a link.
In 1964, which Race and which Color do you think they were referencing?
That is not an assumption, it is having some knowledge of the historical context.
Are you dismissing the sacrifices that White Americans have made for Blacks because some women and hispanics might have also benefited?
Which Races and COlors do you think they were passing the 64 Act for?
Whites? Lol!
HIspanics? LOL, in 1960 they were 3.2% of the population and they weren't the ones marching and rioting.
Are you dismissing the sacrifices that White Americans have made for Blacks because some women and hispanics might have also benefited?
Whatever "sacrifices" that you imagine have been made up many times over through white females benefitting from Affirmative Action more than any other demographic.
Furthermore, the income disparity between whites and every other demographic in America is still substantially tilted in favor of the white population as a whole.
That being said the "discrimination" that you claim has been practiced against the white population is a figment of your persecuted imagination. So yes, I am completely dismissing the ridiculous notion of ANY "sacrifices".
The legislation passed in 1964 was to right a number of wrongs that had existed since America became a country. Get over it. You're not a victim
Thanks.....I knew he sounded familiar.