Republicans Need To Be Careful and Smart

[Darkwind]

The Roy Moore “issue” (masquerading as an issue) is really about something more than just the candidate himself. It is a weapon that could grow into a monstrous beast, if Republicans allow it to.

So far, some of them appear to not be handling this too well. They seem to be playing the game of those setting up Roy Moore, and attempting to derail his campaign.

The problem is potentially huge. If Republicans don't dismiss the Moore smear job as the ridiculous hit job that it appears to be, and let it go at that then Democrats, aided by a liberal-based media, will likely return to this methodology, again and again. Republicans will be playing right into the hands of the scammers.

One can only guess how many stupid people might be swayed by a low-life smear campaign, completely devoid of any evidence. No Republican House or Senate seat or SCOTUS candidate might be safe.

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty. If there is any evidence at all in this Moore "issue", it is the circumstantial evidence (39 years gone by without a claim & 1 month before an election, claims), that points toward a purely bogus, hit job

Not a smear job, and he's the only one who molested girls. It's going to be an issue for the gop. He will be elected and the Senate Ethics panel will have to investigate.

Have you concrete proof he molested anyone? Or do you just need to call Republican names as a daily fix?

 

[nat4900]

Corfman’s mother, Wells, told Breitbart News that reporters for the Washington Post convinced her daughter to give them an interview.


“She did not go to them,” said Wells. “They called her.”


“They tried to convince her to do it?” this reporter asked.

Corfman’s mother, Wells, told Breitbart News that reporters for the Washington Post convinced her daughter to give them an interview.

Yeah.......so, she was "convinced" to give an interview....NOT TO LIE, just an interview.....

Had some right wing fake media like Breitbart approached her to give an interview, what would have happened?

 

[bendog]

The Roy Moore “issue” (masquerading as an issue) is really about something more than just the candidate himself. It is a weapon that could grow into a monstrous beast, if Republicans allow it to.

So far, some of them appear to not be handling this too well. They seem to be playing the game of those setting up Roy Moore, and attempting to derail his campaign.

The problem is potentially huge. If Republicans don't dismiss the Moore smear job as the ridiculous hit job that it appears to be, and let it go at that then Democrats, aided by a liberal-based media, will likely return to this methodology, again and again. Republicans will be playing right into the hands of the scammers.

One can only guess how many stupid people might be swayed by a low-life smear campaign, completely devoid of any evidence. No Republican House or Senate seat or SCOTUS candidate might be safe.

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty. If there is any evidence at all in this Moore "issue", it is the circumstantial evidence (39 years gone by without a claim & 1 month before an election, claims), that points toward a purely bogus, hit job

Not a smear job, and he's the only one who molested girls. It's going to be an issue for the gop. He will be elected and the Senate Ethics panel will have to investigate.

Have you concrete proof he molested anyone? Or do you just need to call Republican names as a daily fix?

IF YOU want to deny Moore prayed on teenage girls, have at it, Laddy.

 

[Darkwind]

The Roy Moore “issue” (masquerading as an issue) is really about something more than just the candidate himself. It is a weapon that could grow into a monstrous beast, if Republicans allow it to.

So far, some of them appear to not be handling this too well. They seem to be playing the game of those setting up Roy Moore, and attempting to derail his campaign.

The problem is potentially huge. If Republicans don't dismiss the Moore smear job as the ridiculous hit job that it appears to be, and let it go at that then Democrats, aided by a liberal-based media, will likely return to this methodology, again and again. Republicans will be playing right into the hands of the scammers.

One can only guess how many stupid people might be swayed by a low-life smear campaign, completely devoid of any evidence. No Republican House or Senate seat or SCOTUS candidate might be safe.

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty. If there is any evidence at all in this Moore "issue", it is the circumstantial evidence (39 years gone by without a claim & 1 month before an election, claims), that points toward a purely bogus, hit job

Not a smear job, and he's the only one who molested girls. It's going to be an issue for the gop. He will be elected and the Senate Ethics panel will have to investigate.

Have you concrete proof he molested anyone? Or do you just need to call Republican names as a daily fix?

IF YOU want to deny Moore prayed on teenage girls, have at it, Laddy.

I don't have to deny it. He does. And He has. What you have to do is provide concrete proof he has. It is the values all Americans used to have until the left decided to make everything political.

 

[nat4900]

I don't have to deny it. He does. And He has. What you have to do is provide concrete proof he has. It is the values all Americans used to have until the left decided to make everything political.

Moore is NOT in a court of law where the individual is innocent until proven guilty....Moore is in the
"court of public opinion" which has a different standard; when dozens of ex-teenagers finally agree to tell about Moore's depraved sexual proclivities, it is up to that "public court" to pass judgment......and the public will do just that in early December.

 

[basquebromance]

we have to be strong, we have to be smart, not just smart, we have to be tough and vigilant!

 

[protectionist]

Not a smear job, and he's the only one who molested girls. It's going to be an issue for the gop. He will be elected and the Senate Ethics panel will have to investigate.

Provide proof for this reckless and idiotic claim >> "he's the only one who molested girls"

Provide it or shut up.

 

[protectionist]

Republicans Need To Be Careful and Smart


then they're fucked - Republicans will never be either at any time ... EVER.

Then how did they get the White House + both houses of Congress + the SCOTUS + most governers all over the country. ?

 

[protectionist]

And good thing they did, or Moore would have never faced consequences for his many rapes of young children.

You are an irresponsible, reckless, unAmerican, blithering idiot, most people would deduce.

 

[protectionist]

There is evidence in this case. What you want is for the Republican Party to become like the Democrat Party. Tolerate any deviant behavior just as long as we win. Putting a pervert in office is not winning. People who claim to be value voters need to start acting like value voters. Moore and Trump are sexual harassers just as Clinton was and we should stand against it no matter whether it is a Republican or Democrat.

You keep saying there is evidence....funny thing is, you never tell us what it is.

 

[nat4900]

Then how did they get the White House + both houses of Congress + the SCOTUS + most governers all over the country. ?

DEPLORABILITY???

Latent RACISM????

Latent misogyny???

....and, of course a serious case of susceptibility to a lying, orange charlatan......

 

[protectionist]

Yeah.......so, she was "convinced" to give an interview....NOT TO LIE, just an interview.....

Had some right wing fake media like Breitbart approached her to give an interview, what would have happened?

They didn't. The Post did.

 

[Darkwind]

Republicans Need To Be Careful and Smart


then they're fucked - Republicans will never be either at any time ... EVER.

Then how did they get the White House + both houses of Congress + the SCOTUS + most governers all over the country. ?

You forgot 2/3's of the Legislatures. But why beat him when he's down? lol

 

[nat4900]

They didn't. The Post did

TRUE....Good journalism which Breitbart (may the devil keep his soul warm) NEVER attempted. LOL

 

[bendog]

he's the only one ACCUSED of molesting children, and the evidence is rather ... overwhelming the mufhfakah's guilty as sin. You wanna deny, you fuckers can knock your selves the fuck out. Out.

As for the dems, they need to be careful because Conyers is likely deeply in the doo, although with adult harassment victims. But he will not resign even if he drags folks down with him, and ethics investigations take YEARS

 

[CowboyTed]

The Roy Moore “issue” (masquerading as an issue) is really about something more than just the candidate himself. It is a weapon that could grow into a monstrous beast, if Republicans allow it to.

So far, some of them appear to not be handling this too well. They seem to be playing the game of those setting up Roy Moore, and attempting to derail his campaign.

The problem is potentially huge. If Republicans don't dismiss the Moore smear job as the ridiculous hit job that it appears to be, and let it go at that then Democrats, aided by a liberal-based media, will likely return to this methodology, again and again. Republicans will be playing right into the hands of the scammers.

One can only guess how many stupid people might be swayed by a low-life smear campaign, completely devoid of any evidence. No Republican House or Senate seat or SCOTUS candidate might be safe.

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty. If there is any evidence at all in this Moore "issue", it is the circumstantial evidence (39 years gone by without a claim & 1 month before an election, claims), that points toward a purely bogus, hit job

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty.

Too funny. Has Hillary ever been convicted of a crime?

Too funny. There are mounds of evidence against Clinton and the only thing Republicans are demanding is an investigation. In the case of Hillary, it is not unsubstantiated accusations from 40 years ago.

You know there was a huge investigation before, a guy called Ken Starr was involved... He didn't like the Clintons much and it ended up with nothing about Clinton sexuall;y harrasing any one... The guy had sex, you seem to not understand the difference between consensual sex and non consensual... Also fucking kiddies is bad...

This is all 'Whataboutism', defend Moore and Trump...

 

[Synthaholic]

The Roy Moore “issue” (masquerading as an issue) is really about something more than just the candidate himself. It is a weapon that could grow into a monstrous beast, if Republicans allow it to.

So far, some of them appear to not be handling this too well. They seem to be playing the game of those setting up Roy Moore, and attempting to derail his campaign.

The problem is potentially huge. If Republicans don't dismiss the Moore smear job as the ridiculous hit job that it appears to be, and let it go at that then Democrats, aided by a liberal-based media, will likely return to this methodology, again and again. Republicans will be playing right into the hands of the scammers.

One can only guess how many stupid people might be swayed by a low-life smear campaign, completely devoid of any evidence. No Republican House or Senate seat or SCOTUS candidate might be safe.

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty. If there is any evidence at all in this Moore "issue", it is the circumstantial evidence (39 years gone by without a claim & 1 month before an election, claims), that points toward a purely bogus, hit job

Even the accuser's mother has said the daughter didn't even have a telephone in her own bedroom. Also, for those who wish to be neutral on this unproven allegation:

Corfman’s mother, Wells, told Breitbart News that reporters for the Washington Post convinced her daughter to give them an interview.


“She did not go to them,” said Wells. “They called her.”


“They tried to convince her to do it?” this reporter asked.

Corfman’s mother, Wells, told Breitbart News that reporters for the Washington Post convinced her daughter to give them an interview.

“She did not go to them,” said Wells. “They called her.”

And good thing they did, or Moore would have never faced consequences for his many rapes of young children.

Link to rape of young children.

Moore was a 32 year old man who was molesting a 14 year old 8th grader in his automobile.

 

[Darkwind]

The Roy Moore “issue” (masquerading as an issue) is really about something more than just the candidate himself. It is a weapon that could grow into a monstrous beast, if Republicans allow it to.

So far, some of them appear to not be handling this too well. They seem to be playing the game of those setting up Roy Moore, and attempting to derail his campaign.

The problem is potentially huge. If Republicans don't dismiss the Moore smear job as the ridiculous hit job that it appears to be, and let it go at that then Democrats, aided by a liberal-based media, will likely return to this methodology, again and again. Republicans will be playing right into the hands of the scammers.

One can only guess how many stupid people might be swayed by a low-life smear campaign, completely devoid of any evidence. No Republican House or Senate seat or SCOTUS candidate might be safe.

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty. If there is any evidence at all in this Moore "issue", it is the circumstantial evidence (39 years gone by without a claim & 1 month before an election, claims), that points toward a purely bogus, hit job

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty.

Too funny. Has Hillary ever been convicted of a crime?

Too funny. There are mounds of evidence against Clinton and the only thing Republicans are demanding is an investigation. In the case of Hillary, it is not unsubstantiated accusations from 40 years ago.

You know there was a huge investigation before, a guy called Ken Starr was involved... He didn't like the Clintons much and it ended up with nothing about Clinton sexuall;y harrasing any one... The guy had sex, you seem to not understand the difference between consensual sex and non consensual... Also fucking kiddies is bad...

This is all 'Whataboutism', defend Moore and Trump...

I understand perfectly. That isn't what I was referring to. But nice try.

 

[Darkwind]

The Roy Moore “issue” (masquerading as an issue) is really about something more than just the candidate himself. It is a weapon that could grow into a monstrous beast, if Republicans allow it to.

So far, some of them appear to not be handling this too well. They seem to be playing the game of those setting up Roy Moore, and attempting to derail his campaign.

The problem is potentially huge. If Republicans don't dismiss the Moore smear job as the ridiculous hit job that it appears to be, and let it go at that then Democrats, aided by a liberal-based media, will likely return to this methodology, again and again. Republicans will be playing right into the hands of the scammers.

One can only guess how many stupid people might be swayed by a low-life smear campaign, completely devoid of any evidence. No Republican House or Senate seat or SCOTUS candidate might be safe.

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty. If there is any evidence at all in this Moore "issue", it is the circumstantial evidence (39 years gone by without a claim & 1 month before an election, claims), that points toward a purely bogus, hit job

Even the accuser's mother has said the daughter didn't even have a telephone in her own bedroom. Also, for those who wish to be neutral on this unproven allegation:

Corfman’s mother, Wells, told Breitbart News that reporters for the Washington Post convinced her daughter to give them an interview.


“She did not go to them,” said Wells. “They called her.”


“They tried to convince her to do it?” this reporter asked.

Corfman’s mother, Wells, told Breitbart News that reporters for the Washington Post convinced her daughter to give them an interview.

“She did not go to them,” said Wells. “They called her.”

And good thing they did, or Moore would have never faced consequences for his many rapes of young children.

Link to rape of young children.

Moore was a 32 year old man who was molesting a 14 year old 8th grader in his automobile.

He was not.

 

[BluesLegend]

The Roy Moore “issue” (masquerading as an issue) is really about something more than just the candidate himself. It is a weapon that could grow into a monstrous beast, if Republicans allow it to.

So far, some of them appear to not be handling this too well. They seem to be playing the game of those setting up Roy Moore, and attempting to derail his campaign.

The problem is potentially huge. If Republicans don't dismiss the Moore smear job as the ridiculous hit job that it appears to be, and let it go at that then Democrats, aided by a liberal-based media, will likely return to this methodology, again and again. Republicans will be playing right into the hands of the scammers.

One can only guess how many stupid people might be swayed by a low-life smear campaign, completely devoid of any evidence. No Republican House or Senate seat or SCOTUS candidate might be safe.

Republicans (and everyone) should stand firmly by the basic American value of >> innocent, unless proven guilty. If there is any evidence at all in this Moore "issue", it is the circumstantial evidence (39 years gone by without a claim & 1 month before an election, claims), that points toward a purely bogus, hit job

Even the accuser's mother has said the daughter didn't even have a telephone in her own bedroom. Also, for those who wish to be neutral on this unproven allegation:

Corfman’s mother, Wells, told Breitbart News that reporters for the Washington Post convinced her daughter to give them an interview.


“She did not go to them,” said Wells. “They called her.”


“They tried to convince her to do it?” this reporter asked.

Corfman’s mother, Wells, told Breitbart News that reporters for the Washington Post convinced her daughter to give them an interview.

“She did not go to them,” said Wells. “They called her.”

And good thing they did, or Moore would have never faced consequences for his many rapes of young children.

Link to rape of young children.

Liberal filth can't provide links to their blatant lies. When a lib really starts telling the whopper lies, that's when you know they are shitting themselves.