Rep. Ken Buck Calls for Investigation into 'Exploitation of Children' in Letter to DOJ

[Lysistrata]

They aren’t pedophiles.

Said in the face of undeniable proof to the contrary. You truly are as delusional as you are dishonest and evil.

Where is your proof dumbo ? You havent even seen the film.

All of these negative comments are based on the conclusion that this movie somehow is "child porn," which is not supported. There is absolutely no "undeniable proof" that it is.

 

[Coyote]

They aren’t pedophiles.

Said in the face of undeniable proof to the contrary. You truly are as delusional as you are dishonest and evil.

If you haven't seen it, how do you know it's child porn? Because some creepy pervert who counts crotch shots says so?

 

[John T. Ford]

This movie isn't about the "sexual expoitation of children". It is a movie about how Instagram and Tik Tok, and Kim Cardashian and public media excourages young girls to become sexualized to get "likes", and

No fuckin' plot justifies child pornography!

There is a reason lawmakers are calling this shit child pornography and calling for investigations.

And, it's not just Republicans calling for this and it's not just Men calling for this.

The only people defending this child pornography are the deeply sick fucks on the Left.

You remind me of the men on the religious right who think that when their daughters participate in a "virginity pledge" ceremony, that they are assured that their daughters will remain virgins until marriage, completely unaware that such pledge ceremonies have lead to an increase in Christian school girls giving blow jobs and participating in anal sex, because they vowed not to have vaginal sex and oral and anal sex will keep their hymen intact.

I raised a child in the internet age, fool. I watched the migration from My Space to Facebook, to instagram, and keeping a pretty young girl from exposing from becoming sexualized in today's media marketplace is virually impossible. I kept her away from commercial television and we had no cable, but still, my daughter came of age in today's toxic media and it affects her still.

You need to wake up to what the "influencers" with their botoxed and "filtered" faces and risque poses are the girls with the most "likes" and the most "followers". The skankier the poses the more the girls get attention and approval. Parents of young women despair, when hundreds of teenage girls show up at the publicity appearances of women whose claim to fame is a sex tape.

Why would anyone defend what lawmakers in Congress are calling child pornography.

Why do people on the Left think child pornography is OK?

 

[John T. Ford]

And yet, here you are, doing exactly that.

You can bet they have seen enough of it to know what it is.

 

[John T. Ford]

Which it seeks to achieve, by visualizing and pornographizing children.

“War is peace!”​

“Freedom is slavery!”​

“Ignorance is strength!”​

“Making and distributing child pornography is the way to fight child pornography!”​

Exactly.

This is why EVERYTHING about the Left is wrong for this Great Nation.

 

[Coyote]

And yet, here you are, doing exactly that.

You can bet they have seen enough of it to know what it is.

Who has?

 

[John T. Ford]

They aren’t pedophiles.

Said in the face of undeniable proof to the contrary. You truly are as delusional as you are dishonest and evil.

Clearly ....

These people are defending pedophiles.

 

[John T. Ford]

Where is your proof dumbo ? You havent even seen the film.

There are pictures and clips all over the news of this movie.

It cannot be any more clear what this is.

Why would you defend a movie that lawmakers in Congress call child pornography?

 

[John T. Ford]

All of these negative comments are based on the conclusion that this movie somehow is "child porn," which is not supported. There is absolutely no "undeniable proof" that it is.

And, when the DOJ Investigation proves you wrong will you still defend this child pornography?

I suspect we all already know the answer to that.

 

[Coyote]

All of these negative comments are based on the conclusion that this movie somehow is "child porn," which is not supported. There is absolutely no "undeniable proof" that it is.

And, when the DOJ Investigation proves you wrong will you still defend this child pornography?

I suspect we all already know the answer to that.

If the DoJ thinks it's child porn, then I'm fine with that determination. Who wouldn't be?

Maybe then we can tackle the disgusting child pageant industry.

 

[John T. Ford]

If the DoJ thinks it's child porn, then I'm fine with that determination. Who wouldn't be?

Maybe then we can tackle the disgusting child pageant industry.

Lawmakers are already calling it child pornography.

So are countless Americans as evidenced by all the subscription cancellations Netflix is seeing.

 

[Lysistrata]

All of these negative comments are based on the conclusion that this movie somehow is "child porn," which is not supported. There is absolutely no "undeniable proof" that it is.

And, when the DOJ Investigation proves you wrong will you still defend this child pornography?

I suspect we all already know the answer to that.

Do you think that I would believe the results of an investigation initiated by barr? I'm not that stupid. You keep saying that I am "defending" child pornography, which, of course, I am not. What is wrong with you? Is this something that you got from QAnon? Frankie graham? Breitbart? The Gateway Pundit? Seriously.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

If the DoJ thinks it's child porn, then I'm fine with that determination. Who wouldn't be?

Maybe then we can tackle the disgusting child pageant industry.

Lawmakers are already calling it child pornography.

So are countless Americans as evidenced by all the subscription cancellations Netflix is seeing.

Are you the weirdo who counts "crotch" shots ?

 

[John T. Ford]

Do you think that I would believe the results of an investigation initiated by barr?

If it was an investigation critical of a Republican ....

You betcha !!!

However, an investigation into child pornography?

Well I believe you already answered that one.

I'm not that stupid.

Yes ... you are.

You keep saying that I am "defending" child pornography, which, of course, I am not.

Yes you are.

Lawmakers have labeled this movie child pornography and you are adamantly defending it.

What is wrong with you?

The real question is what is wrong with you when it comes to condemning this movie that is being called child pornography.

Is this something that you got from QAnon? Frankie graham? Breitbart? The Gateway Pundit? Seriously.

Actually .... I got from members of Congress like:

Sen. Tom Cotton

Rep. Jim Banks

Rep. Ken Buck

Rep. Andy Biggs

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard

 

[John T. Ford]

Are you the weirdo who counts "crotch" shots ?

That's the kind of behavior one would expect from folks who defends child pornography.

Just saying ....

 

[Lysistrata]

Do you think that I would believe the results of an investigation initiated by barr?

If it was an investigation critical of a Republican ....

You betcha !!!

However, an investigation into child pornography?

Well I believe you already answered that one.

I'm not that stupid.

Yes ... you are.

You keep saying that I am "defending" child pornography, which, of course, I am not.

Yes you are.

Lawmakers have labeled this movie child pornography and you are adamantly defending it.

What is wrong with you?

The real question is what is wrong with you when it comes to condemning this movie that is being called child pornography.

Is this something that you got from QAnon? Frankie graham? Breitbart? The Gateway Pundit? Seriously.

Actually .... I got from members of Congress like:

Sen. Tom Cotton

Rep. Jim Banks

Rep. Ken Buck
Rep. Andy Biggs

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard

Just because somebody, who may or may not be very intelligent, calls something "child pornography" doesn't necessarily make it so. Most of these "lawmakers" are right-wing whackos. You are so stupid that you would trust barr and believe tom cotton. I'm not "defending" anything, just noting the crazy origins of this "controversy."

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It's a french film that debuted in the US at the Sundance Film Festival, dope.
You idiots should actually watch it before jumping on the tard train.

I guess I should have seen this coming, a piece of degenerate left wrong-wing shit explicitly encouraging us to watch child pornography.

It's against the rules of this forum to come out and say what you just as much as admitted about yourself, but there's no need; everyone now knows anyway.

I guess I should have seen this coming, a piece of degenerate left wrong-wing @shit explicitly encouraging us to watch child pornography.

It's obviously not child pornography, retard.
You should watch it and report your findings.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Do you think that I would believe the results of an investigation initiated by barr?

If it was an investigation critical of a Republican ....

You betcha !!!

However, an investigation into child pornography?

Well I believe you already answered that one.

I'm not that stupid.

Yes ... you are.

You keep saying that I am "defending" child pornography, which, of course, I am not.

Yes you are.

Lawmakers have labeled this movie child pornography and you are adamantly defending it.

What is wrong with you?

The real question is what is wrong with you when it comes to condemning this movie that is being called child pornography.

Is this something that you got from QAnon? Frankie graham? Breitbart? The Gateway Pundit? Seriously.

Actually .... I got from members of Congress like:

Sen. Tom Cotton

Rep. Jim Banks

Rep. Ken Buck
Rep. Andy Biggs

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard

Just because somebody, who may or may not be very intelligent, calls something "child pornography" doesn't necessarily make it so. Most of these "lawmakers" are right-wing whackos. You are so stupid that you would trust barr and believe tom cotton. I'm not "defending" anything, just noting the crazy origins of this "controversy."

Who the fuck is ken buck ?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It's a French film, dope.
Federal law does not apply to it's casting or production.

It certainly does apply, however, to the distribution of child pornography within this country; even if we cannot do anything about those who produced and distributed in the same other country that gives sanctuary to one of our more infamous child rapists.

It certainly does apply, however, to the distribution of child pornography within this country; even if we cannot do anything about those who produced and distributed in the same other country that gives sanctuary to one of our more infamous child rapists.

It's obviously not child pornography, retard.

 

[John T. Ford]

Just because somebody, who may or may not be very intelligent, calls something "child pornography" doesn't necessarily make it so.

And, you continue defending child pornography.

Most of these "lawmakers" are right-wing whackos.

Except Tusli Gabbard.

Do you think she i s right wing whacko to for calling this film child pornography?

You are so stupid that you would trust barr and believe tom cotton.

I don't think trusting those men to stop the Left from exploiting children is Stupid.

Neither do the majority of Americans.

I'm not "defending" anything, just noting the crazy origins of this "controversy."

You just did ......Again.

You have defended this so many times at this point I have lost track.