Rep. Ken Buck Calls for Investigation into 'Exploitation of Children' in Letter to DOJ

Which it seeks to achieve, by visualizing and pornographizing children.

“War is peace!”“Freedom is slavery!”“Ignorance is strength!”“Making and distributing child pornography is the way to fight child pornography!”
"Retarded is retarded"
 
Just because somebody, who may or may not be very intelligent, calls something "child pornography" doesn't necessarily make it so.

And, you continue defending child pornography.

Most of these "lawmakers" are right-wing whackos.

Except Tusli Gabbard.

Do you think she i s right wing whacko to for calling this film child pornography?

You are so stupid that you would trust barr and believe tom cotton.

I don't think trusting those men to stop the Left from exploiting children is Stupid.

Neither do the majority of Americans.

I'm not "defending" anything, just noting the crazy origins of this "controversy."
You just did ......Again.

You have defended this so many times at this point I have lost track.

Back up. You call these guys men???? I know nothing of this Gabbard.I never "defended" this movie or attacked it, as I haven't seen it. But I find its detractors to generally be a bunch of dumb lunatics who have less brains than a garden snail. Your assertion about "the majority of Americans" is full of it, since you can't know what everyone thinks. Really, stop acting like an idiot.
 
Back up. You call these guys men????

Nope.

I called them lawmakers.

I know nothing of this Gabbard.

Well she was only a Presidential candidate for the Democrat Party this year.

But, it doesn't surprise me you have not heard of her.

They don't call you guys No/Low Information Extremist for nothing

I never "defended" this movie or attacked it,

Oh ...... I believe that is EXACTLY what you are doing here.

All of these negative comments are based on the conclusion that this movie somehow is "child porn," which is not supported. There is absolutely no "undeniable proof" that it is.

Next point ....

as I haven't seen it.

So you confess you are discussing a topic you know nothing about.

I DON'T BELIEVE YOU !!!!

But I find its detractors to generally be a bunch of dumb lunatics who have less brains than a garden snail.

Really .....

Says the person defending this movie that is being called child pornography by lawmakers in Congress, both men and women and from both sides of the aisle.

I think in this case I am going to side with the lawmakers over some dumbass Leftist defending child porn on a political forum

Your assertion about "the majority of Americans" is full of it, since you can't know what everyone thinks. Really, stop acting like an idiot.
You think the majority of Americans DON'T reject child pornography?

You are the IDIOT !!!!
 
Back up. You call these guys men????

Nope.

I called them lawmakers.

I know nothing of this Gabbard.

Well she was only a Presidential candidate for the Democrat Party this year.

But, it doesn't surprise me you have not heard of her.

They don't call you guys No/Low Information Extremist for nothing

I never "defended" this movie or attacked it,

Oh ...... I believe that is EXACTLY what you are doing here.

All of these negative comments are based on the conclusion that this movie somehow is "child porn," which is not supported. There is absolutely no "undeniable proof" that it is.

Next point ....

as I haven't seen it.

So you confess you are discussing a topic you know nothing about.

I DON'T BELIEVE YOU !!!!

But I find its detractors to generally be a bunch of dumb lunatics who have less brains than a garden snail.

Really .....

Says the person defending this movie that is being called child pornography by lawmakers in Congress, both men and women and from both sides of the aisle.

I think in this case I am going to side with the lawmakers over some dumbass Leftist defending child porn on a political forum

Your assertion about "the majority of Americans" is full of it, since you can't know what everyone thinks. Really, stop acting like an idiot.
You think the majority of Americans DON'T reject child pornography?

You are the IDIOT !!!!
Did you support Roy Moore ?
 
Back up. You call these guys men????

Nope.

I called them lawmakers.

I know nothing of this Gabbard.

Well she was only a Presidential candidate for the Democrat Party this year.

But, it doesn't surprise me you have not heard of her.

They don't call you guys No/Low Information Extremist for nothing

I never "defended" this movie or attacked it,

Oh ...... I believe that is EXACTLY what you are doing here.

All of these negative comments are based on the conclusion that this movie somehow is "child porn," which is not supported. There is absolutely no "undeniable proof" that it is.

Next point ....

as I haven't seen it.

So you confess you are discussing a topic you know nothing about.

I DON'T BELIEVE YOU !!!!

But I find its detractors to generally be a bunch of dumb lunatics who have less brains than a garden snail.

Really .....

Says the person defending this movie that is being called child pornography by lawmakers in Congress, both men and women and from both sides of the aisle.

I think in this case I am going to side with the lawmakers over some dumbass Leftist defending child porn on a political forum

Your assertion about "the majority of Americans" is full of it, since you can't know what everyone thinks. Really, stop acting like an idiot.
You think the majority of Americans DON'T reject child pornography?

You are the IDIOT !!!!
Did you support Roy Moore ?

Here is a thread where right wingers are defending paedos.
 
No democrats?
They ought to investigate the child porn pageant industry.
I don't agree with those either but, to think they would be investigated as child porn is really dumb.
You don't agree with the promoters of the child porn movie but you think the investigation would be really dumb? Maybe dangerous to the democrat progressive movement?
That is just dumb, to imply child porn is part of any mainstream political movement.
Well...when your policies suck.....all you have left is to claim the other side are pedophiles....
 
Well...when your policies suck.....all you have left is to claim the other side are pedophiles....
What policies?

You mean like B. Hussein's bathroom mandate allowing grown men to go into little girls bathrooms and locker rooms?

Thank God the President was able to rescind that Leftist pervert policy.

And, no one has to claim anything about the Left supporting pedophilia.

All one has to do is simply read the comments in this very thread.
 
Well...when your policies suck.....all you have left is to claim the other side are pedophiles....
What policies?

You mean like B. Hussein's bathroom mandate allowing grown men to go into little girls bathrooms and locker rooms?

Thank God the President was able to rescind that Leftist pervert policy.

And, no one has to claim anything about the Left supporting pedophilia.

All one has to do is simply read the comments in this very thread.
expanding Social Security instead of cutting it...
expanding Medicare/Medicaid instead of cutting it...
Protecting people with pre-existing conditions instead of claiming you are doing it when you are really trying to repeal it..
Not trying to minimize 200K people dying because you are worried about the stock market...

and if I were a trumper, I wouldn't brag about sacrificing thousands of lives for a stock market....especially when the markets keep doing better under democrat administrations...so like I said...when your policies suck, resort to calling everyone pedophiles

EiHWZ_nWsAEbqoK.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top