Reject Reject Reject

Last edited:
Continuing the current rates is preventing a Tax Increase, not a tax cut.

hogwash and everybody knows it.

Now YOU are bleating away in support of $2 trillion in tax cut extensions while fauxly braying about a piddly $150 billion in pork spending.
 
No, you did not, you dim bulb.

They did not demand $2T in tax cuts. Continuing the current rates is preventing a Tax Increase, not a tax cut.

Now, go play in traffic with your little gang of Big Government Orwellians.

MSN called them tax cuts. The free thinking stopped there.

even CNN called them tax cuts

Senate passes controversial tax cut deal - CNN.com

stop playing semantics.


Well there you go. We should all obey the Liberal MSM and adopt the official Big Government Meme.
 


Earmarks are only 1% of the federal budget.(http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/11/19/earmark-spending-2011)

$16 billion dollars for American projects that stimulate the economy.


The agreement calls for incremental annual increases in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) to Israel, reaching $3 billion a year by FY2011. (http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33222.pdf)

$3 Billion for Israel projects that stimulate the Israel economy.


A war completely funded by borrowing. U.S. debt soared from $6.4 trillion in March 2003 to $10 trillion in 2008. (The true cost of the Iraq war: $3 trillion and beyond)

10T to stimulate Afghanistan economy.


The question is, who should get the United States Pig?

Part of the budget is funding national health care. Interesting, while 1/2 of congress would deny Americans health care, they give Israel foreign aid so they can subsidize their Socialist Health Care Program going back to 1948!!!

Yes, folks, the cons are conning you...........and you are the Loser, your tax dollars make Israel winners.
 
Last edited:
Continuing the current rates is preventing a Tax Increase, not a tax cut.

hogwash and everybody knows it.

Now YOU are bleating away in support of $2 trillion in tax cut extensions while fauxly braying about a piddly $150 billion in pork spending.


You'd make a good little apparatchik.

You probably think of tax receipts as REVENUE, and tax cuts as SPENDING.
 


Earmarks are only 1% of the federal budget.(http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/11/19/earmark-spending-2011)

$16 billion dollars for American projects that stimulate the economy.


The agreement calls for incremental annual increases in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) to Israel, reaching $3 billion a year by FY2011. (http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33222.pdf)

$3 Billion for Israel projects that stimulate the Israel economy.


A war completely funded by borrowing. U.S. debt soared from $6.4 trillion in March 2003 to $10 trillion in 2008. (The true cost of the Iraq war: $3 trillion and beyond)

10T to stimulate Afghanistan economy.


The question is, who should get the United States Pig?

I focus on dollar amount and not the percentage...it's just a thing with me. :eusa_whistle:
 
LC has bought into the progressive double speak. Not raising taxes is a tax cut.
 


Earmarks are only 1% of the federal budget.(http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/11/19/earmark-spending-2011)

$16 billion dollars for American projects that stimulate the economy.


The agreement calls for incremental annual increases in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) to Israel, reaching $3 billion a year by FY2011. (http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33222.pdf)

$3 Billion for Israel projects that stimulate the Israel economy.


A war completely funded by borrowing. U.S. debt soared from $6.4 trillion in March 2003 to $10 trillion in 2008. (The true cost of the Iraq war: $3 trillion and beyond)

10T to stimulate Afghanistan economy.


The question is, who should get the United States Pig?

Only one percent of the budget? :eek: Then you won't miss them when they're gone. Merry Christmass HO HO HO
 
and......................... the caved as usual. once again the repubs show they have no spine. 89-19

89 -19? WTF is this? Were they playing a pickup game in roundball?

89+19=109? 109 what?

He was counting the reps from all 57 states. I guess 20 of them decided not to vote. :eusa_drool:

my bad it was 81-19.

passed with an 81% majority, still. looks like all those repubs stuck to their guns after all.

it was a typo: Senate passes controversial tax cut deal - CNN.com
 
Last edited:
Important thing to note is that by law this was supposed to have been done back in September. And they are just now getting to it. And throwing in all kinds of nonsense that no one knows what is going on but he lobbyists and the staffers. And they aren't telling
 
LC has bought into the progressive double speak. Not raising taxes is a tax cut.

LOL. Tax rates were already established for 2011. This IS a tax cut for those rates. What the rate is now is irrelevant. Keep spinning though.
 

Forum List

Back
Top