Record 93,626,000 Americans not in labor force

[danielpalos]

Some on the left subscribe to merely and simply using Capitalism for all of its worth and lowering our Tax burden through market friendly Commerce, well regulated.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Some on the left subscribe to merely and simply using Capitalism for all of its worth and lowering our Tax burden through market friendly Commerce, well regulated.

Huh? "I'll have the blue cheese dressing with the word salad."

 

[danielpalos]

Some on the left subscribe to merely and simply using Capitalism for all of its worth and lowering our Tax burden through market friendly Commerce, well regulated.

Huh? "I'll have the blue cheese dressing with the word salad."

Why not solve for a natural rate of unemployment via our at-will employment laws and at the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage that clears our poverty guidelines?

It must be less expensive than any War on Poverty.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Some on the left subscribe to merely and simply using Capitalism for all of its worth and lowering our Tax burden through market friendly Commerce, well regulated.

Huh? "I'll have the blue cheese dressing with the word salad."

Why not solve for a natural rate of unemployment via our at-will employment laws and at the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage that clears our poverty guidelines?

It must be less expensive than any War on Poverty.

It might be less expensive than the War on Poverty? What is "It"? If I knew what you are writing about, maybe "it" would! Please, post it in standard English.

 

[danielpalos]

Some on the left subscribe to merely and simply using Capitalism for all of its worth and lowering our Tax burden through market friendly Commerce, well regulated.

Huh? "I'll have the blue cheese dressing with the word salad."

Why not solve for a natural rate of unemployment via our at-will employment laws and at the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage that clears our poverty guidelines?

It must be less expensive than any War on Poverty.

It might be less expensive than the War on Poverty? What is "It"? If I knew what you are writing about, maybe "it" would! Please, post it in standard English.

not enough attention to go around?

Why not solve for a natural rate of unemployment via our at-will employment laws and at the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage that clears our poverty guidelines?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Oil increase is in spite of Obama.

I will agree that Obama has been irrelevant to increased production. The increased production has been the result of improved technology and people in a free market choosing to utilize that technology in the industry of oil production. But that's not what you said.

The level has not kept pace with demand because of Obama.

Patently false. The fact that prices are lower demonstrates that the increase in US production exceeded increases in demand. You need a non idiot to teach you supply and demand. BTW, I'm not a "lefty." Your problem is that you pretend to be a conservative, but you really are just an idiot who hates Obama and will say anything that gets your anti-Obama rocks off. Morons like you are the reason Obama was reelected in 2012. Swing voters figured if your stupid shit is the only reason to oppose him, he must be good.

You need a non-idiot to teach you about Stockholm Syndrome and supply and demand.
You're referring to prices as they are and I'm referring to what they were and should be. Obama energy policy has kept them unnecessarily high. And that impacts the entire economy. That is why we have yet to see economic recovery.

*facepalm*

Obama got elected because the public was suffering from Stockholm Syndrome? I have heard it all now. I have absolutely heard every last batshitting crazy piece of nonsense.

I really hope so, anyway. Because if there's more after that, then Humanity doesn't deserve to exist anymore.

Stockholm Syndrome is how the sheeple were duped. Gruber knew that the people were too stupid to do the math.

Swim Expert Wins!
Of course RoshawnMarkwees was not much competition, a typical whiner, one who hates Obama for reasons s/he might not understand.

One can only surmise, but it seems this is one more lifetime loser who hates a man of color for being successful.

Totally pointless disparagement. You've made the troll bin.

 

[pinqy]

Why not solve for a natural rate of unemployment via our at-will employment laws and at the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage that clears our poverty guidelines?

Because that doesn't make any sense. "To solve for a natural rate of unemployment" has no meaning. What precisely is the problem, what is the method of solving the problem, and what is the result?

 

[MathewSmith]

And, yes, think of how many tax payers have been taken out of the work force. But they will still vote democrat. Once stupid, always stupid. And we are electing the same people.

 

[Wry Catcher]

I will agree that Obama has been irrelevant to increased production. The increased production has been the result of improved technology and people in a free market choosing to utilize that technology in the industry of oil production. But that's not what you said.

Patently false. The fact that prices are lower demonstrates that the increase in US production exceeded increases in demand. You need a non idiot to teach you supply and demand. BTW, I'm not a "lefty." Your problem is that you pretend to be a conservative, but you really are just an idiot who hates Obama and will say anything that gets your anti-Obama rocks off. Morons like you are the reason Obama was reelected in 2012. Swing voters figured if your stupid shit is the only reason to oppose him, he must be good.

You need a non-idiot to teach you about Stockholm Syndrome and supply and demand.
You're referring to prices as they are and I'm referring to what they were and should be. Obama energy policy has kept them unnecessarily high. And that impacts the entire economy. That is why we have yet to see economic recovery.

*facepalm*

Obama got elected because the public was suffering from Stockholm Syndrome? I have heard it all now. I have absolutely heard every last batshitting crazy piece of nonsense.

I really hope so, anyway. Because if there's more after that, then Humanity doesn't deserve to exist anymore.

Stockholm Syndrome is how the sheeple were duped. Gruber knew that the people were too stupid to do the math.

Swim Expert Wins!
Of course RoshawnMarkwees was not much competition, a typical whiner, one who hates Obama for reasons s/he might not understand.

One can only surmise, but it seems this is one more lifetime loser who hates a man of color for being successful.

Totally pointless disparagement. You've made the troll bin.

Word salad is a symptom of schizophrenia. Did you forget to take your meds, or is this your way to garner attention?

 

[danielpalos]

nothing but fallacies, where o' where has all of the logic and reason gone in modern times.

 

[pinqy]

nothing but fallacies, where o' where has all of the logic and reason gone in modern times.

Oh, what specific fallacies are you claiming? The problem is that you, as you have done before, are using vague terms with ambiguous meaning. Your constantly reference at will employment but never ever explain why you mention it or what role you think it plays.

 

[danielpalos]

I only seem ambiguous if you don't have a clue or a Cause; otherwise, there is no ambiguity in my strings of words.

I have stated over two hundred and fifty times, what, exactly, I mean by my strings of words regarding that specific topic.

There is no appeal to ignorance of a federal Doctrine in American law regarding the concept of employment at will.

Why not start there to ameliorate your ignorance of the law.

 

[g5000]

what the hell is this ? i thought the liberliars said the labor force was at an all time high ???

Why don't you find the number for people IN the labor force and tell us?

 

[pinqy]

I only seem ambiguous if you don't have a clue or a Cause; otherwise, there is no ambiguity in my strings of words.

I have stated over two hundred and fifty times, what, exactly, I mean by my strings of words regarding that specific topic.

No, you have not...not once. That nobody else...NOBODY....understands what you're trying to say does not mean you're smarter than everyone else. It means you are not clear in your communiction. Trying to claim it's our fault for not understanding you is ridiculous.

 

[g5000]

The number of people in the labor force in May 2015 was 157,469,000. Has that number ever been higher?

 

[g5000]

Here's a chart showing the labor force going back to 1978: United States Labor Force Statistics - Seasonally Adjusted

As you can see, our work force of 157,469,000 is a record high.

 

[danielpalos]

I only seem ambiguous if you don't have a clue or a Cause; otherwise, there is no ambiguity in my strings of words.

I have stated over two hundred and fifty times, what, exactly, I mean by my strings of words regarding that specific topic.

No, you have not...not once. That nobody else...NOBODY....understands what you're trying to say does not mean you're smarter than everyone else. It means you are not clear in your communiction. Trying to claim it's our fault for not understanding you is ridiculous.

That is your problem to the extent you prefer to be ignorant of the law. Maybe YouTube can help.

 

[pinqy]

I only seem ambiguous if you don't have a clue or a Cause; otherwise, there is no ambiguity in my strings of words.

I have stated over two hundred and fifty times, what, exactly, I mean by my strings of words regarding that specific topic.

No, you have not...not once. That nobody else...NOBODY....understands what you're trying to say does not mean you're smarter than everyone else. It means you are not clear in your communiction. Trying to claim it's our fault for not understanding you is ridiculous.

That is your problem to the extent you prefer to be ignorant of the law. Maybe YouTube can help.

I am very familar with labor laws and how labor markets work. Your phrases are nonsense, though. Tell you what....no youtube, but you give a link to somebody else who agrees with your stance and maybe I'll understand them. Because you just keep repeating nonsense phrases and refusing to admit any fault in your communication.

 

[danielpalos]

No, you don't; or, you would understand the simple concept of employment at will and unemployment compensation that could solve simple poverty and capitalism's natural rate of unemployment by merely using socialism in that manner.

 

[pinqy]

No, you don't; or, you would understand the simple concept of employment at will

I understand the concept of employment at will.

and unemployment compensation that could solve simple poverty

I do not understand what form of unemployment compensation you have in mind, what employment at will has to do with it, nor what you consider the differences between simple and complex poverty. I've asked you many times and you have never clarified...never defined an actual system or method.

and capitalism's natural rate of unemployment by merely using socialism in that manner.

IN WHAT MANNNER? You're not describing a manner. you NEVER describe any specifics.

Again...provide a link to anyone else, preferably and actual economist, who explains what you're talking about.