esalla
Platinum Member
- Banned
- #301
Life corrodes over time too, which is why god designed reproduction and evolutionCars evolve over time too, god merely created a way so that his designs improve themselves. Evolution is based upon changing code so without the code there is nothing to evolve thus god becomes a scientific need, just like dark matterWrong question. You should be asking where did the code that evolves come from as code does not spontaneously generateDinos were very successful but were replaced by mammals. What happened to them and where did birds come from? Does the world really need 3 type of mammal body plans?Just like human designers reuse workable body plansIf there is an "Intelligent Designer" they are very odd, sometimes they were really lazy and sometimes they made extra work for themselves.All part of the Grand Plan, doncha know? The shockingly beautiful, so immediately evident, "Intelligent Design"!Yo you never explained why so much of gods creations all died out. Is god stupid or somethingNo true scientist, at that I know of, disputes the FACT that new species have come into being. The fossil record PROVES this is a fact.Somehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.
No theory is perfect but Darwinian evolution is the best explanation we have that explains the world we see and most scientists agree. If you don't have a better theory, which you don't, it is reasonable to accept Darwin's Natural Selection as the mechanism of evolution we see.
Define "fact."
They continued to reuse existing body plans to perform very different functions. Think about the fingers of a bat being used to form a wing. Sometimes they did just the opposite, using very different body plans to form the same function. Think about how much the porpoise resembles the shark.You need to learn to readSomehow, there is a plot to advance Darwinism, even though many scientists have documented how very wrong the theory is.
And, on you three.....the indoctrination worked.
As long as there are weak-minded, easily led folks, Militant Secularism will succeed.
I have never once called Evolution a fact. If you think I have then please find that quote and post it.
When you can't find that quote, will you have the integrity to admit you just lied about my stance?
I bet not.
In the meanwhile you have not provided any proof that any text books used in US public schools state that evolution is a proven scientific fact.
Didn't you ask me to find Darwinist propaganda in textbooks?
I sure put a cork in your pie hole, huh?
I asked you for evidence that the public school text books call the Theory of evolution a scientifically proven fact.
That is after all what you are whining about isn't it??????????????????????????????????
You need to learn to read: I gave you two examples the texts used to 'prove' Darwin.
Both are lies.
And in neither example were the words "scientifically proven fact" present. And the second one was some 19th century crap that you have not proven is still being taught in public schools today.
The fact is we do see both animal and plant species change over time due to many external factors. You agreed that speciation can happen in plants and I posted a link to what biologists believe to be the onset of speciation in a bird population.
So are you denying these things too?
So please post something from a widely used public school text that definitively states Darwin's Theory of evolution is a scientifically proven fact. That is you argument is it not?
Maybe you don't realize that saying we can see changes in animal species over time is not the same as saying Darwin's theory has been scientifically proven to be fact
The Big Bang is also a theory taught in schools and while it is widely accepted it still is not fact.
No cars rust over time.
There is no comparison between an inanimate object and a living thing.
And when you can give me scientific proof that some supreme being exists and that same supreme being snapped his fingers and created everything let me know.
DNA could have existed long before life itself
The idea that life began with RNA – simpler than DNA – looks less certain now that a DNA-like molecule has been made from basic compoundswww.newscientist.com
Chemists are close to demonstrating that the building blocks of DNA can form spontaneously from chemicals thought to be present on the primordial Earth.
After decades of trying, in 2009 researchers finally managed to generate RNA using chemicals that probably existed on the early Earth. Matthew Powner, now at University College London, and his colleagues synthesised two of the four nucleotides that make up RNA. Their achievement suggested that RNA may have formed spontaneously – powerful support for the idea that life began in an “RNA world”.
Did life emerge in the 'primordial soup' via DNA or RNA? Maybe both
Scientists have long debated which genetic information carrier—DNA or RNA—started life on Earth, but a new study suggests life could have begun with a bit of both. The research, led by scientists from the Medical Research Council (MRC) Laboratory of Molecular Biology (LMB), in Cambridge, shows...phys.org