Rand Paul pledges to force Hunter Biden vote if GOP backs Dem impeachment witnesses

I’ll give you the answer to my question. Shokin prosecuted zero corruption cases as prosecutor general. Does that seem like he was doing a good job to you?
And how long was he prosecutor while obonghole an Jojo were in charge of relations with Ukraine with a corrupt ambassador?

Former Ukrainian Prosecutor Says Yovanovitch Lied to Congress
View attachment 300205
Dec 10, 2019 · Former Ukrainian Prosecutor-General Yuriy Lutsenko has accused former U.S. Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch of lying to Congress in her sworn testimony given at President Donald Trump’s impeachment inquiry, according to an exclusive interview with One America News Network.



View attachment 300206The Daily Wire
Obama's Ukraine Ambassador Allegedly Lied Under Oath In Impeachment Inquiry ...
View attachment 300207
Nov 7, 2019 · Marie Yovanovitch, who was appointed to be the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine by former President Barack Obama, allegedly made false statements under oath during her October 11 closed-door testimony in House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry. ... “This show has obtained exclusively

Shokin was prosecutor general for a year. Zero prosecutions of corruption.

Have you heard of the diamond prosecutor case?
Funny you mention this as the prosecutor WAS NEVER PROSECUTED... But you knew that but are running out of bullshit!!!!

The prosecutor that was found with millions of dollars worth of diamonds, cash and Shokin’s passport without any explanation was never prosecuted. What does that tell you?
He was holding it for Hunter and Jojo Biden!....Easy andvtrue answer!

Nah, it doesn't.
 
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) sent a public warning shot on Monday night, saying that if Republicans support Democrats' impeachment witness requests then he will force votes during the trial on calling witnesses conservatives want to hear from.

"My colleagues can’t have it both ways. Calling for some, while blocking others," Paul tweeted referencing a Politico report on a similar private warning his gave GOP colleagues against supporting Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer's request that former national security adviser John Bolton testify.

"If we are going to give a platform to witnesses the Dems demand, I look forward to forcing votes to call Hunter Biden and many more!" Paul continued.

(Excerpt) Read more at

Rand Paul pledges to force Hunter Biden vote if GOP backs Dem impeachment witnesses
------------

I’ll be glad when this shit show is over with. It was all nonsense to start with and it still is.

Best scenario is the Senate calls for a vote for dismissal and it passes. The dems in the House then look like the petulant toddlers they are. It really is hard to believe grown adults acted the way they did due to their clear case of TDS.

Trump will have an asterisk after his name noting a do-nothing House led by the worst speaker in modern times led a full witch hunt because she is simply butthurt in the blood sport known as American politics.

The ones injured by this will be the dems. They already are. No one can trust them again. They have again proven they are not capable of being adult or governing responsibly. They must go.

We are talking about relevant witnesses. The ones the Democrats want are relevant. Paul wants to abuse the Senate's power to call irrelevant witnesses. Rand Paul is a punk.

You think it is okay for a President to abuse their powers to pressure a foreign government to investigate a political rival. That is even worse than Watergate. The only TDS that is present is the symptoms that are exhibited by you. You have to sound stupid to defend Trump. Voters agree that what Trump did was wrong. What they disagree on is the penalty and they see it as the serious matter it is. Trump and his supporters are petulant children.

There will be a trial in the Senate and not a dismissal. The asterisk will be he was the third President to be impeached. The Senate is the do-nothing body.
There is a bill in the Senate concerning drug prices that represents a compromise between Grassley and Wyden. Grassley has 60 votes in the Senate yet still can't pass it because of McConnell. McConnell is crooked and he is the most unpopular figure in Washington. They will decide Republicans must go.
 
You are afraid of Quid Pro Joe and Crackhead Biden having to testify.


That they are....

There is nothing to fear because a Biden testimony is irrelevant to this case.
Yes, it is. And you are scared shitless of the Biden Crime Family testifying.
I have no reason to be scared. You do. That's why you're barking about the Bidens instead of trump, Pompeo, Bolton, Giuliani, and Mulvaney.
 
There is nothing to fear because a Biden testimony is irrelevant to this case.


In your opinion it is, because you don't care/support Democrats stealing from the US taxpayer.

Your pathetic spin is that finding out what happened to the US foreign aid package sent to Ukraine is a "crime" because Democrats received kickbacks from it is par for the course of what you stand for = STEALING from the AMERICAN TAXPAYER

Once "proven" as if it already isn't clearly true, there will be a "crime," and the "crime" was by BIDEN, not Trump....

Sorry, your side will lose because your side is dishonest and kleptocratic....
 
You are afraid of Quid Pro Joe and Crackhead Biden having to testify.


That they are....

There is nothing to fear because a Biden testimony is irrelevant to this case.
Yes, it is. And you are scared shitless of the Biden Crime Family testifying.
I have no reason to be scared. You do. That's why you're barking about the Bidens instead of trump, Pompeo, Bolton, Giuliani, and Mulvaney.
And yet you are.
 
If he is not removed from office, he will still be guilty, like Clinton still had his affair.

Hunter Biden has nothing to do with tramps trial.
Actually, the phone call about the BIDENS' activity is the REASON for the impeachment...

Why are you so against the American people finding out what REALLY happened, and WHY the phone call was made???

There was no phone call about the Bidens. This is America. We do not open investigations just to open a investigation. There is not enough for the DOJ to even open a preliminary investigation.
 
There will be witnesses that are pertinent to the charges, each one has to be voted on, to appear.

If Hunter Biden testimony is pertinent, then he'll be voted on.
He is not on trial though, he also did not make an accusation against Trump that Trump is being charged with, Hunter has not been charged with anything illegal by our DOJ or by the Ukraine.


HOW can Hunters appearance even help Trump in his defense of his articles?

The manager's witnesses are pertinent, and necessary to figure out the truth.

The Senators will never vote on a circus......unlikely you'll get the 51 +, but go for it, for all I care, if the law allows it...... Nothing he can say can help Trump get off for his high crimes.... He really should prepare for a real defense of the charges instead of trying to use his impeachment trial to smear the Biden's..... he's acting like THE FIX IS IN for his acquittal, so why not just use the trial, to score some smearing points against his opponent's family....

:rolleyes:

Again, HOW can Hunter testifying help him get acquitted???:dunno:
It's already a circus, and Dim managers are not the ones who decide which witnesses are relevant. witnesses are never the ones who are being prosecuted. How fucking stupid are you?

The fact that you are so desperate to keep Hunter from testifying shows exactly why he should testify. Also Adolph Schiffler and the so-called whistleblower.

The fix was in during the House "inquiry," so it's no surprise that you believe the Republicans are just as sleazy and unprincipled.

It's funny how Dims run roughshod over Trumps constitutional rights in the House and then believe they get to do the same thing in the Senate.
 
If he is not removed from office, he will still be guilty, like Clinton still had his affair.

Hunter Biden has nothing to do with tramps trial.
Actually, the phone call about the BIDENS' activity is the REASON for the impeachment...

Why are you so against the American people finding out what REALLY happened, and WHY the phone call was made???

There was no phone call about the Bidens. This is America. We do not open investigations just to open a investigation. There is not enough for the DOJ to even open a preliminary investigation.
Democrats open investigations because they can't win at the ballot box.
 
Actually, the phone call about the BIDENS' activity is the REASON for the impeachment...

Why are you so against the American people finding out what REALLY happened, and WHY the phone call was made???
The phone call was about a Russian media sourced conspiracy theory about Biden that subsequent investigative reporting has failed to confirm. You will find this threat from Rand Paul holds no terror. They have every intention of illustrating this was all based on Russian propaganda anyway.

You are forgetting that Barr and Durham can follow the money trail, and if the Bidens' stories don't jive than there is a perjury charge hanging over them.
Trump has every right to investigate suspected corruption, its in the law. So the rationale' for delaying the transfer of money, is pertinent to the case.
Even if it were all true it does not excuse Trump's actions one iota. He still used the power of his office for personal gain, extorted a foreign leader and orchestrated a cover-up that continues to this day.
yet none of that is proven, just speculation by the left who LOVES to blindly accuse.
RUSSIA
Kavanaugh
Page (even if they set that one up themselves)
and now Trump for whatever excuse they could pull out of their ass.

not notching a single victory - ie NEVER being correct in their accusations - limits their own credibility. i don't give two dog shits about trumps at this point; it's a different story or another matter.

are the bidens guilty?

seems funny your sense of justice ends when you like someone.
Not a Biden supporter. Had an investigation been launched through official channels by reputable people for legitimate reasons I would not have any problem with that.
You mean an investigation run by deep state douchebags?

Yeah, I'm sure that would be thorough and unbiased.
 
There is nothing to fear because a Biden testimony is irrelevant to this case.


In your opinion it is, because you don't care/support Democrats stealing from the US taxpayer.

Your pathetic spin is that finding out what happened to the US foreign aid package sent to Ukraine is a "crime" because Democrats received kickbacks from it is par for the course of what you stand for = STEALING from the AMERICAN TAXPAYER

Once "proven" as if it already isn't clearly true, there will be a "crime," and the "crime" was by BIDEN, not Trump....

Sorry, your side will lose because your side is dishonest and kleptocratic....

Democrats didn't get any kickbacks. This Biden stuff is fake news that trump put out there because he knew idiots like you would fall for it. trump approved money to Ukraine in 2017-18 with no concern for corruption, Burisma and the Bidens. Thus far, everything your side has claimed has not been true. Biden did nothing and his son was legally employed. That's the way it is. Accept this and save yourself the embarrassment.
 
You mean an investigation run by deep state douchebags?

Yeah, I'm sure that would be thorough and unbiased.


Like.... the Warren Commission, the 911 Commission etc.....

When "Deep State" Zionism "investigates, we, the American people, have a 100% probability of getting LIED TO yet again....
 
Democrats didn't get any kickbacks


So you claim that the $16 million Hunter Biden received for never showing up to work, not speaking the language, and not having any useful expertise..... is not a kickback....

LOL!!!!!

What "value" did Hunter provide "Burisma" to get such compensation???


Answer - to a Democrat, being paid for doing NOTHING is fine and usual, since most Democrats "work" for the government, do nothing, and get paid a lot of $$$$ for doing nothing....
 
Democrats didn't get any kickbacks


So you claim that the $16 million Hunter Biden received for never showing up to work, not speaking the language, and not having any useful expertise..... is not a kickback....

LOL!!!!!

What "value" did Hunter provide "Burisma" to get such compensation???


Answer - to a Democrat, being paid for doing NOTHING is fine and usual, since most Democrats "work" for the government, do nothing, and get paid a lot of $$$$ for doing nothing....

You are the one making those accusations. You have to provide the proof.
 
I’ll give you the answer to my question. Shokin prosecuted zero corruption cases as prosecutor general. Does that seem like he was doing a good job to you?
And how long was he prosecutor while obonghole an Jojo were in charge of relations with Ukraine with a corrupt ambassador?

Former Ukrainian Prosecutor Says Yovanovitch Lied to Congress
View attachment 300205
Dec 10, 2019 · Former Ukrainian Prosecutor-General Yuriy Lutsenko has accused former U.S. Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch of lying to Congress in her sworn testimony given at President Donald Trump’s impeachment inquiry, according to an exclusive interview with One America News Network.



View attachment 300206The Daily Wire
Obama's Ukraine Ambassador Allegedly Lied Under Oath In Impeachment Inquiry ...
View attachment 300207
Nov 7, 2019 · Marie Yovanovitch, who was appointed to be the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine by former President Barack Obama, allegedly made false statements under oath during her October 11 closed-door testimony in House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry. ... “This show has obtained exclusively

Shokin was prosecutor general for a year. Zero prosecutions of corruption.

Have you heard of the diamond prosecutor case?
Funny you mention this as the prosecutor WAS NEVER PROSECUTED... But you knew that but are running out of bullshit!!!!

The prosecutor that was found with millions of dollars worth of diamonds, cash and Shokin’s passport without any explanation was never prosecuted. What does that tell you?
He was holding it for Hunter and Jojo Biden!....Easy andvtrue answer!
Prove it.
 
You are the one making those accusations. You have to provide the proof.


""Proving it" starts with an INVESTIGATION....

and that is what you Democrats are so opposed to - investigating all the money in crackhead Hunter Biden's pocket....


When you say PROVE IT and you also say YOU CANNOT INVESTIGATE IT, you out yourself as a HYPOCRITE with an AGENDA
 
Of course Trump can have witnesses too, but they have to be pertinent to his charges.... Hunter can say nothing that helps trump... it's a witch hunt by the President, against Hunter... Hunter would be advised to not talk by his lawyer due to the gvt powered witch hunt by Trump...

AND THAT is precisely what Trump wants.... Hunter to plead the 5th, so Trump can use that, FOR HIS OWN PERSONAL GAIN.....which again, is illegal.
So, Hunter taking the 5th to avoid incriminating himself would be a crime............................BY TRUMP!

You are one delusional Dimwit.:21::21::21:
He's not looking for a crime silly one.... He wants something to trash his opponent With.... Trump has claimed many times, pleading the 5th makes one guilty....

This is all, every inch of it, about hurting his political opponent in the presidential race coming up.

Thus, using Giuliani and the two thugs, and not the legal and proper procedures, which is thru the DOJ.
You still have not explained how Crackhead Biden taking the 5th is a crime by Trump.

Try again.
yes I did....
Bullshit. You have done no such thing.

How would Crackhead Biden taking the 5th to prevent self incrimination be a crime by Trump?

I can see Hunter Biden taking the 5th to avoid incriminating or making Joe look bad. And I don't see where the evidence against the Bidens is any less flimsy than that against Trump. What evidence does Guiliani have against the Bidens, or anyone else connected to the Dems? What is the Durham Report going to reveal? Is the Senate going to investigate this whole Ukraine thing?

Then there's that so-called whistleblower, who actually isn't a whistleblower according to the regs. Who's going to come out of this looking worse, and is any of this really worth the turmoil and loss of respect that most Americans already have for their federal gov't and the political machinations going on?

I'd rather avoid the shit-show. Start the trial, hear both sides make their case, ask and answer questions and then vote to acquit. It's hard really to see the GOP not doing that, once the case has been made and questions answered. This trial should be based on existing evidence of 'crimes and misdemeanors' uncovered by the Dems that resulted in the impeachment. If they want to, they can impeach him a 2nd time, right? And this time do it right, subpoena whoever and whatever they want o, and let the courts deicde whether executive privilege should be allowed or not.
 

Forum List

Back
Top