Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #101
No those who benifit most should give most
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No those who benifit most should give most
Look at 8:12 in the video you posted.Here is the video I promised in Post #1. Start at the 5:40 mark:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crgZ9oGJUHU
So, you approve of Coburn lying, as long as, in your estimation, very few saw the lie exposed. Thanks, I'm not surprised.Rachel Maddow just totally nailed Senator Coburn. She showed a clip of Coburn today on FOX saying that the 9/11 responders health care bill was being rammed through hastily, and that it hadn't even been to committee yet, or even held a meeting.
Rachel showed video of the Congressional meeting from back in July and highlighted Coburn's empty seat - he didn't bother to show up!
Video when it becomes available.
Perhaps she did get him, but how many viewers actually even watch her show, 14?
Regardless, unless it's paid for with cuts it shoudn't be passed. Not that it won't be, but it shouldn't be. Unless you're preparing to defend passage while adding this to the deficit?
As has been shown, he did not lie in the first place. If you think he lied about this subject please quote the alleged lie and then explain how you came to the conclusion what he said is, in fact, a lie.So, you approve of Coburn lying, as long as, in your estimation, very few saw the lie exposed. Thanks, I'm not surprised.Rachel Maddow just totally nailed Senator Coburn. She showed a clip of Coburn today on FOX saying that the 9/11 responders health care bill was being rammed through hastily, and that it hadn't even been to committee yet, or even held a meeting.
Rachel showed video of the Congressional meeting from back in July and highlighted Coburn's empty seat - he didn't bother to show up!
Video when it becomes available.
Perhaps she did get him, but how many viewers actually even watch her show, 14?
Regardless, unless it's paid for with cuts it shoudn't be passed. Not that it won't be, but it shouldn't be. Unless you're preparing to defend passage while adding this to the deficit?
Yeah, but she's a lesbian, and that maker wrong. And,and, and... she'[s gonna go to hell for being a dyke!Those who hate Racheal, hate the truth. She exposes the ignorance and hypocrisy of the New Right, and in particular the talking heads of the extreme fringe of the Republican Party using primary sources - their own words.
How else to deflect her words but to attack her personally? The RW Fringe on this board is too stupid to engage in debate on issues or even opinions. They, for the most part, rely on ad hominem attacks, staw man arugments, red herrings, hasty generalizations and confusion over cause and effect. Oh, and repeating the same phrase oft repeated here and on talk radio - sort of like an echo.
Synthia said:Didn't read it, Synthia...
Won't read it either... Don't care what Madcow or Coburn have to say....
Just wanted to correct some intentional misinformation....
Typical.
Yes, you are a typical leftist whackjob.... I'd probably read more of your stuff if you weren't such a hack... But, alas....
That's because the "Tea Party" is a front for Rightwing billionaires like the Koch brothers.And still not one fucking word from the TEA PARTY about the budget busting tax bill
Here is the video I promised in Post #1. Start at the 5:40 mark:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crgZ9oGJUHU
Look at 8:12 in the video you posted.
Did you notice that Coburn's seat was empty? GE's Bulldyke mouthpiece sure did. Did you notice that almost all of the other committee seats that General Electric did not highlight were also empty? Probably not because they purposfully darkened them in the video, didn't they.
So where was Coburn?????
He was at Elena Kagan's confirmation hearing. Dumbass! You know, a hearing to confirm a lifetime nominee to the highest court in the USA. You know... that Supreme Court thingy?
Why do you take a dumb **** GE corporate shill like Maddow seriously? Don't you know that her show on MSNBC is nothing but a GE infomercial? And GE will say anything to denigrate Republicans simply because the Republicans won't pass GE's cap and tax bill?
Does he need to tell the truth?Coburn doesn't need to make Rachel Maddow happy.
He did lie.As has been shown, he did not lie in the first place. If you think he lied about this subject please quote the alleged lie and then explain how you came to the conclusion what he said is, in fact, a lie.So, you approve of Coburn lying, as long as, in your estimation, very few saw the lie exposed. Thanks, I'm not surprised.Perhaps she did get him, but how many viewers actually even watch her show, 14?
Regardless, unless it's paid for with cuts it shoudn't be passed. Not that it won't be, but it shouldn't be. Unless you're preparing to defend passage while adding this to the deficit?
In other words, you can't quote the alleged lie.He did lie.As has been shown, he did not lie in the first place. If you think he lied about this subject please quote the alleged lie and then explain how you came to the conclusion what he said is, in fact, a lie.So, you approve of Coburn lying, as long as, in your estimation, very few saw the lie exposed. Thanks, I'm not surprised.
The lie, dimwit, was the claim that it never went to committee.In other words, you can't quote the alleged lie.He did lie.As has been shown, he did not lie in the first place. If you think he lied about this subject please quote the alleged lie and then explain how you came to the conclusion what he said is, in fact, a lie.
Fuck off you ignorant little *****!
Actually Maddow said that you fucking dimwitted General Electric drone. Coburn did not say that.The lie, dimwit, was the claim that it never went to committee.In other words, you can't quote the alleged lie.He did lie.
Fuck off you ignorant little *****!