Rachel Maddow Rocked Meet the Press

[Trajan]

Rachel Maddow Makes History and Triumphs over the War On Women

Rachel Maddow was correct. The interruption by Castellanos was significant, because Republicans don’t want to talk about the war on women. They have adopted the same position towards the rights of women that they long ago adopted towards issues like poverty and racism. It doesn’t exist. Castellanos was trying to muddy the waters with funny math designed to deny the fact that women earn less than men. Women who work full time earn 77% of what men do. Until today, that fact was not in dispute.

Castellanos tried to use different factors to claim that the wage gap doesn’t exist, but even when all factors are taken into account, 41% of the wage gap is unexplained. This means that when a man and a woman the same background, doing the same job, working the same hours, women still make less money than men.

For Alex Castellanos the argument was matter of political strategy. His goal was to make some people believe that there is cause for question on the existence of the pay gap. (You may also recognize this strategy as the exact same course the right has pursued on climate change).

Castellanos’s behavior towards Maddow proved that the Republican Party has declared war on women. By watching the video, you can see his condescending tone directed at Maddow. When he said that he appreciated her passion, but that she was wrong, he was trying to portray her as an irrational woman who was being guided by her emotions.

That's what I've been talking about. THAT is what we're up against.

You are up against truth?

What fracking war on women? If she thinks there is a fracking war on women she doesn't deserve the scholarship she had. The simple fact is that women are not getting paid less for the same work. She also lied about why they Lily Ledbetter Act was passed. The fact is that Ledbetter knew about the discrimination for years, and decided not to sue, for whatever reason. If she hadn't known about the discrimination there were provisions in the old law that allowed a woman to sue based on when she actually discovered the actions, not when they first happened.

Women doing the same job as men get paid more than men in today's world. I can't wait until men start filing suit against employers for paying them less than they do women. If I ever find out that a woman doing the same job as I do gets paid more I will gladly jump on the lawsuit bandwagon to make a point.

Here is a simple fact of life, there are things men can do that women cannot. Men are, pound for pound, stronger than women. Men can do heavy work that is impossible for women, and generally take on jobs that women won't do. Lumberjacks are paid better than average, and are almost exclusively men. You could blame that on sexism, or you could admit that most women wouldn't be able to do the work.

There is no fracking war on women, and the Democrats lost it anyway.

the dems and their soul mates have turned the obamacare issue ala contraception and religious org. rights into a 'war on woman'...its kool aid. *shrugs*

 

[Trajan]

The Right has no one in the media as intelligent and articulate as Rachel Maddow. Not even close.

George Will comes to mind off the top of my head.

krauthammer.....daniel henniger....

 

[CrusaderFrank]

There's a War on Wimmen?

When?

How?

Are they still on Fluke's vaq-ja-ja?

 

[Sarah G]

The Right has no one in the media as intelligent and articulate as Rachel Maddow. Not even close.

George Will comes to mind off the top of my head.

krauthammer.....daniel henniger....

Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn what's his face, Sarah Palin, lots of real brainy type Rs out there right?

 

[Oddball]

The Right has no one in the media as intelligent and articulate as Rachel Maddow. Not even close.

George Will comes to mind off the top of my head.

krauthammer.....daniel henniger....

John Stossel, Thomas Sowell, Charles Murray, Jacob Sullum....

 

[Samson]

George Will comes to mind off the top of my head.

krauthammer.....daniel henniger....

Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn what's his face, Sarah Palin, lots of real brainy type Rs out there right?

Yes, Sarah, Democrats have a monopoly on intellect.

Oddly, this has not completely resolved ANY issue during the past 4 years.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

George Will comes to mind off the top of my head.

krauthammer.....daniel henniger....

Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn what's his face, Sarah Palin, lots of real brainy type Rs out there right?

You want a contest naming stupid people? I bet I can name more from both either side than you can from one.

 

[Sarah G]

krauthammer.....daniel henniger....

Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn what's his face, Sarah Palin, lots of real brainy type Rs out there right?

You want a contest naming stupid people? I bet I can name more from both either side than you can from one.

Yeah, you probably can. I don't know half the stupid Repubs on the air.

 

[Peach]

The Right has no one in the media as intelligent and articulate as Rachel Maddow. Not even close.

George Will comes to mind off the top of my head.

The best conservative voice that remains.

 

[Stephanie]

Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn what's his face, Sarah Palin, lots of real brainy type Rs out there right?

You want a contest naming stupid people? I bet I can name more from both either side than you can from one.

Yeah, you probably can. I don't know half the stupid Repubs on the air.

ah, so you're saying Maddow is a Democrat?

 

[BDBoop]

Rachel Maddow Makes History and Triumphs over the War On Women

Rachel Maddow was correct. The interruption by Castellanos was significant, because Republicans don’t want to talk about the war on women. They have adopted the same position towards the rights of women that they long ago adopted towards issues like poverty and racism. It doesn’t exist. Castellanos was trying to muddy the waters with funny math designed to deny the fact that women earn less than men. Women who work full time earn 77% of what men do. Until today, that fact was not in dispute.

Castellanos tried to use different factors to claim that the wage gap doesn’t exist, but even when all factors are taken into account, 41% of the wage gap is unexplained. This means that when a man and a woman the same background, doing the same job, working the same hours, women still make less money than men.

For Alex Castellanos the argument was matter of political strategy. His goal was to make some people believe that there is cause for question on the existence of the pay gap. (You may also recognize this strategy as the exact same course the right has pursued on climate change).

Castellanos’s behavior towards Maddow proved that the Republican Party has declared war on women. By watching the video, you can see his condescending tone directed at Maddow. When he said that he appreciated her passion, but that she was wrong, he was trying to portray her as an irrational woman who was being guided by her emotions.

That's what I've been talking about. THAT is what we're up against.

I'll have to watch it but I must say, I'm getting real tired of hearing her complain about the war on women. I do agree with her but she is taking it way too far. It isn't helpful.

I think she'll keep talking about it as long as they keep 1) waging it, and 2) claiming it's a figment of our imagination.

 

[mudwhistle]

Rachel Maddow Makes History and Triumphs over the War On Women

Rachel Maddow was correct. The interruption by Castellanos was significant, because Republicans don’t want to talk about the war on women. They have adopted the same position towards the rights of women that they long ago adopted towards issues like poverty and racism. It doesn’t exist. Castellanos was trying to muddy the waters with funny math designed to deny the fact that women earn less than men. Women who work full time earn 77% of what men do. Until today, that fact was not in dispute.

Castellanos tried to use different factors to claim that the wage gap doesn’t exist, but even when all factors are taken into account, 41% of the wage gap is unexplained. This means that when a man and a woman the same background, doing the same job, working the same hours, women still make less money than men.

For Alex Castellanos the argument was matter of political strategy. His goal was to make some people believe that there is cause for question on the existence of the pay gap. (You may also recognize this strategy as the exact same course the right has pursued on climate change).

Castellanos’s behavior towards Maddow proved that the Republican Party has declared war on women. By watching the video, you can see his condescending tone directed at Maddow. When he said that he appreciated her passion, but that she was wrong, he was trying to portray her as an irrational woman who was being guided by her emotions.

That's what I've been talking about. THAT is what we're up against.

I'm not impressed with who is the loudest but with who makes sense.

She was shouting everyone down. She was acting like a bitch.

 

[mudwhistle]

The Right has no one in the media as intelligent and articulate as Rachel Maddow. Not even close.

She has her talking points down....but they're pure multifarious nonsense.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

George Will comes to mind off the top of my head.

krauthammer.....daniel henniger....

Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn what's his face, Sarah Palin, lots of real brainy type Rs out there right?

Biden?

Obama 57 States?

Al Franken?

Rdean?

 

[mudwhistle]

Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn what's his face, Sarah Palin, lots of real brainy type Rs out there right?

You want a contest naming stupid people? I bet I can name more from both either side than you can from one.

Yeah, you probably can. I don't know half the stupid Repubs on the air.

If you can find a lib that can fill 3 hours of radio without repeating themselves over and over and without going on an angry rant feel free.

Glenn Beck is a bit of a flake.....kind of a clean Howard Stern.

Rush is simply a pompous voice that usually is right.

Usually when libs try to do it they sound stupid, unprepared, and most of all very anti-social. Like that Left-wing Slut Ed Schutz.

 

[BDBoop]

Rachel Maddow Makes History and Triumphs over the War On Women

Rachel Maddow was correct. The interruption by Castellanos was significant, because Republicans don’t want to talk about the war on women. They have adopted the same position towards the rights of women that they long ago adopted towards issues like poverty and racism. It doesn’t exist. Castellanos was trying to muddy the waters with funny math designed to deny the fact that women earn less than men. Women who work full time earn 77% of what men do. Until today, that fact was not in dispute.

Castellanos tried to use different factors to claim that the wage gap doesn’t exist, but even when all factors are taken into account, 41% of the wage gap is unexplained. This means that when a man and a woman the same background, doing the same job, working the same hours, women still make less money than men.

For Alex Castellanos the argument was matter of political strategy. His goal was to make some people believe that there is cause for question on the existence of the pay gap. (You may also recognize this strategy as the exact same course the right has pursued on climate change).

Castellanos’s behavior towards Maddow proved that the Republican Party has declared war on women. By watching the video, you can see his condescending tone directed at Maddow. When he said that he appreciated her passion, but that she was wrong, he was trying to portray her as an irrational woman who was being guided by her emotions.

That's what I've been talking about. THAT is what we're up against.

I'm not impressed with who is the loudest but with who makes sense.

She was shouting everyone down. She was acting like a bitch.

Shouting everyone down?! The asshole next to her did everything but pat her on the head and say "There, there, honey!" He was dismissive at best and condescending at worse.

What a prick.

 

[GWV5903]

Rachel Maddow Makes History and Triumphs over the War On Women

Rachel Maddow was correct. The interruption by Castellanos was significant, because Republicans don’t want to talk about the war on women. They have adopted the same position towards the rights of women that they long ago adopted towards issues like poverty and racism. It doesn’t exist. Castellanos was trying to muddy the waters with funny math designed to deny the fact that women earn less than men. Women who work full time earn 77% of what men do. Until today, that fact was not in dispute.

Castellanos tried to use different factors to claim that the wage gap doesn’t exist, but even when all factors are taken into account, 41% of the wage gap is unexplained. This means that when a man and a woman the same background, doing the same job, working the same hours, women still make less money than men.

For Alex Castellanos the argument was matter of political strategy. His goal was to make some people believe that there is cause for question on the existence of the pay gap. (You may also recognize this strategy as the exact same course the right has pursued on climate change).

Castellanos’s behavior towards Maddow proved that the Republican Party has declared war on women. By watching the video, you can see his condescending tone directed at Maddow. When he said that he appreciated her passion, but that she was wrong, he was trying to portray her as an irrational woman who was being guided by her emotions.

That's what I've been talking about. THAT is what we're up against.

His behavior declared war on women???

Proof positive, if you repeat a lie loud enough and long enough some will believe it to be the truth...

His control was impeccable, she is a rude disrespectful bitch, her condescending remark was proof...

The fantasy world of the Liberal Left never ceases to amaze...

 

[whitehall]

Maddow is a radical left wing lesbian crusader. So surprises there.

 

[mudwhistle]

Rachel Maddow Makes History and Triumphs over the War On Women



That's what I've been talking about. THAT is what we're up against.

I'm not impressed with who is the loudest but with who makes sense.

She was shouting everyone down. She was acting like a bitch.

Shouting everyone down?! The asshole next to her did everything but pat her on the head and say "There, there, honey!" He was dismissive at best and condescending at worse.

What a prick.

That's your opinion.

She was rude.

 

[BDBoop]

Rachel Maddow Makes History and Triumphs over the War On Women

Rachel Maddow was correct. The interruption by Castellanos was significant, because Republicans don’t want to talk about the war on women. They have adopted the same position towards the rights of women that they long ago adopted towards issues like poverty and racism. It doesn’t exist. Castellanos was trying to muddy the waters with funny math designed to deny the fact that women earn less than men. Women who work full time earn 77% of what men do. Until today, that fact was not in dispute.

Castellanos tried to use different factors to claim that the wage gap doesn’t exist, but even when all factors are taken into account, 41% of the wage gap is unexplained. This means that when a man and a woman the same background, doing the same job, working the same hours, women still make less money than men.

For Alex Castellanos the argument was matter of political strategy. His goal was to make some people believe that there is cause for question on the existence of the pay gap. (You may also recognize this strategy as the exact same course the right has pursued on climate change).

Castellanos’s behavior towards Maddow proved that the Republican Party has declared war on women. By watching the video, you can see his condescending tone directed at Maddow. When he said that he appreciated her passion, but that she was wrong, he was trying to portray her as an irrational woman who was being guided by her emotions.

That's what I've been talking about. THAT is what we're up against.

His behavior declared war on women???

Proof positive, if you repeat a lie loud enough and long enough some will believe it to be the truth...

His control was impeccable, she is a rude disrespectful bitch, her condescending remark was proof...

The fantasy world of the Liberal Left never ceases to amaze...

His behavior proves his perceptions, as do yours. Well played, sir. Well played.