Questioning and Verifying, or Passive and Accepting

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,898
60,271
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
Conservatives, and intelligent folks in general, operate via the former phrase.
Liberals and Democrats, the latter.

1.But don’t take my word for it….here, from the smartest Democrat in recent memory, Daniel Patrick Moynihan:
"Somehow liberals have been unable to acquire from birth what conservatives seem to be endowed with at birth: namely, a healthy skepticism of the powers of government to do good."
Daniel Patrick Moynihan

No matter the evidence or experience, Liberals just nod and accept.



2.Not as either brave nor persistent as we on the Right, the Lefts drones were beaten into submission by government school. Even with abundant evidenced that they were being lied to, they simply nodded their acquiescence, and devolved into the dolts, parroting the propaganda here, on the board.

3. Liberalism is all about turning over your ability to think to bureaucrats, experts, party bosses.

" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review




4. Here is a glaring example of the above, one which has poisoned race relations, and doomed an emerging black middle class to poverty and incarceration on Uncle Sam’s plantation, i.e., the welfare system:

LBJ bought the black vote for the Democrats with a system that encouraged dependency, paying black women as long as they remained single and pregnant. It destroyed the nuclear family

1966 LBJ expanded the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program. Under FDR, AFDC had been limited to widows, those who had lost their husbands and now lacked a breadwinner at home to help support the children.

Then Democrats began to loosen and expand the rules of AFDC eligibility, eventually getting to the point where any woman living alone with children could take advantage of this program. In doing so, they not only bought a large number of new votes, they also incentivized out of wedlock births single motherhood.
But....they had their captive voters.


As Charles Murray described in “Losing Ground,” the Great Society incentivized the same negative behaviors that cause poverty in the first place.

Millions of women discovered that they could be better off financially by not marrying.




“Liberal experts” defended the system, denying the effects that were evident to all……and the Liberal dunces simply nodded and muttered ‘duh…yeah…yup!’
They simply accept what their masters tell them.

Proof ….coming right up.
 
5. The reason for LBJ’s ill-advised program was as clear as today’s Democrat fiasco of encouraging the illegal alien invasion: votes.


Yet, the academic battalion was right there to back it up with lies.

There was Joyce Ladner, for whom being black and educated- she became the first female president of Howard University- was secondary to being Democrat Liberal.

One might have hoped that she would be looking out for her brethren….but, nay, she simply found ways to pretend that sociopathologies were the way to go.

One must question the validity of the white middle-class lifestyle from its very foundation because it has already proven itself to be decadent and unworthy of emulation,” she wrote in “Tomorrow’s Tomorrow.”

WHAT????

Ignore the successful and effective behaviors???????


Do the very opposite, in fact, and expect happiness and prosperity???????




Questioning and Verifying, or Passive and Accepting

Conservatives, and intelligent folks in general, operate via the former phrase.
Liberals and Democrats, the latter.


 
6. Here’s another sell-out….er, Democrat/Liberal

Robert Hill, of the Urban League, ‘American sociologist involved in advocacy for African American equality and civil rights,’ was right there supporting the lies.

Research studies have revealed that many one-parent families are more intact or cohesive than many two-parent families: data on child abuse, battered wives and runaway children indicate higher rates among two-parent families in suburban areas than one-parent families in inner cities communities.”



Is it any wonder why blacks lag behind, when this is the sort of garbage professional blacks foist upon their fellows?’



But even more to the point…..where were all the ‘intelligent’ Liberals looking at the results and declaring these traitorous blacks liars and frauds????
 
7. So….Democrats, Liberals, the black elite, all lie and support the sorts of behaviors that cause poverty and criminality.



Lest there be any doubt:

“The strongest predictor of whether a person will end up in prison, is that they were raised by a single parent”.
C.C. Harper and S.S. McLanahan, “Father Absence and Youth Incarceration”, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Assoc., San Francisco, CA, 1998

In 1996, 70% of inmates in state juvenile detention centers serving long sentences, were raised by single mothers. Wade Horn, “Why There Is No Substitute For Parents”, IMPRIMIS 26, NO.6, June, 1997

72% of juvenile murderers, and 60% of rapists came from single mother homes.
Chuck Colson, “How Shall We Live?” Tyndale House , 2004, p.323

70% of teen births occur to girls in single mother homes.
David T. Lykken, “Reconstructing Fathers”, American Psychologist 55, 681,681, 2000

70% of drop-outs, and 70% of teen suicides come from single mother homes.
Wade Horn, “Why There Is No Substitute For Parents,” IMPRIMIS 26, N0. 6, June 1997

70% of runaways, 70% of juvenile delinquents, and 70% of Child murderers, come from single mother homes.
Richard E. Redding, “It’s Really About Sex”, Duke Univ. Journal of Gender Law and Policy, Jan.1, 2008



Yet, the Dems support pathologies in which they would never engage....


...for votes.
 
Democrats claim love for their darker brethren…..yet endorse and encourage the sorts of behaviors that keep them in poverty and submission.

The proof of duplicity is that the Liberals behave in entirely different fashion than they pretend to applaud.
 
8. The wholly owned subsidiary of Liberalism, called Feminism, was just as devious and destructive.


This was the Liberal propaganda, designed to gain the black vote:

“…feminists projected onto the struggling single mother an image of the ‘strong black woman’ who had always had to work and who was ‘superior in terms of [her] ability to function healthily in the world’ as Toni Morrison put it. The lucky black single mother could also enjoy more equal relationships with men than her miserably married white sisters.

Fretting about single-parent families was now not only racist but also sexist, an effort to deny women their independence, their sexuality, or both.” Burgess Owens, “Liberalism,” p.110-111



And what did those Liberals/Democrats accomplish????

“The coining of the term “feminization of poverty” is widely attributed to Diana Pearce (1978), who, on the basis of statistical analysis for the United States between the 1950s and 1970s, reported a trend towards increased concentration of income poverty among women, and especially among Afro-American female-headed households.” Feminization of Poverty - The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization - Chant - Wiley Online Library




Yet, the same plans, programs and propaganda is in effect to this day.

Questioning and Verifying, or Passive and Accepting

Conservatives, and intelligent folks in general, operate via the former phrase.
Liberals and Democrats, the latter.
 
9. But wait, you say!
Perhaps these Liberals/Democrats actually believe that the nuclear family, marriage, and tradition is bad!!!
Couldn’t they actually believe that destroying these institutions is good for black folks????

Boooooogussss!!!!


“The radical delegitimizing of the family was so pervasive that even people at the center of power joined in. It made no difference that so many of these cheerleaders for single mothers had themselves spent their lives in traditional families and probably would rather have cut off an arm than seen their own unmarried daughters pushing strollers.” Burgess Owens, “Liberalism,” p. 111

Low class morality:
“For Women Under 30, Most Births Occur Outside Marriage”For Women Under 30, Most Births Occur Outside Marriage


b. What the elites do:
“One group still largely resists the trend: college graduates, who overwhelmingly marry before having children. That is turning family structure into a new class divide, …”
Ibid.



Charles Murray uses a phrase that incorporates the wisdom of traditional morality:
"The elites must preach what they practice."



So….Liberals/Democrats are lying low-lives who are willing to sacrifice their black brethren for their own political power….or they are cowardly curs, afraid to speak the truth.
 
10. Gotta give credit where credit is due......

Communist China higher class than American Liberals:

"China takes aim at hip-hop, saying 'low-taste content' must stop
...a widespread clamp-down on popular culture: the country's nascent hip-hop scene, which resonated with Chinese youth last year on hugely popular television show "Rap of China."

Hip hop artists Wang Hao, known as "PG One" and Zhou Yan, known as "GAI" - the two winners of the show - have been sanctioned in recent weeks for bad behaviour or content ...

...lewd lyrics, which critics said were insulting to women and encouraged the use of recreational drugs."
China takes aim at hip-hop, saying 'low-taste content' must stop
 
Yeah, conservatives who demand that loopholes be kept in the background check laws for gun purchases are really into questioning and verifying...
 

Forum List

Back
Top