Pros and cons of the membership of Ukraine in the EU

WSDeters

Rookie
Dec 13, 2011
1
0
1
Nowadays the economical crisis in European countries is the top and the highest discussed issue in mass media. Greece, Italy, Portugal… who is the next one?
However, in such situation, the European elite is considering ability to give a chance to some different countries. The matter is about EU – Ukraine trade negotiations. For Ukraine it is new levels of trade, investment and growth and new kinds of economic freedom. So, what benefits will Europe receive?
First of all it needs to draw attention that joining Free Trade Area is a part of the Association Agreement: the Association Agreement could be the first of its kind under the European Neighborhood Policy. Meanwhile two controversial questions in EU-Ukraine relationship are faced: profitable trade partnership and political issue dealing with democracy violations. The great resonance was caused by the sentence of Ukrainian former Prime Minister, Julia Timoshenko.
The EU leaders raised concerns as to this verdict regarding it as a political move and expressed negative reaction. According to the President of the European Parliament Jerzy Buzek, strengthening the rule of law and a credible fight against corruption are essential not only for the conclusion of the Association Agreement by the end of the year and the deepening of EU-Ukraine relations, but also for the consolidation of democracy in Ukraine. He urged Ukraine to uphold the principles and common values that form the core of the Eastern partnership.
In turn, the High Representative foe Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton declared that Association Agreement is not conceived as a gift to Ukraine, or a gift to the EU. It is envisaged as a mutually beneficial contract sharing European values and standards, opening markets, modernizing and diversifying the Ukrainian economy and entrenching the rule of law and fundamental freedoms.
What kind of Agreement is that? A deal that will be a key for integration of economies, creation of new opportunities both for Ukrainian and European operators in all sectors of the economy. In short, this agreement offers a pathway to Ukraine's future prosperity. Support of eastern neighbors is to help them up the ladder to growth, to develop trade relations, and Free Trade Areas have been an instrument of choice in supporting partners' growth, throughout the world.
For example, in order to be exported towards the EU, Ukraine's dairy and meat products have to pay tariff duties but maybe more importantly to meet certain sanitary standards. It's all very well abolishing those tariff duties but if we don't help Ukrainian exporters meet the EU sanitary standards for milk or beef for example, then there will be no actual trade in those products.
So, in this agreement Europe will tackle such issues: Ukrainian laws and standards will become compatible with those of the European Union in trade-related areas. This is a very important chapter of approximation of legislation.
This means that Ukrainian manufacturers will meet EU norms and standards simply by respecting Ukraine's own rules and regulations. Coupled with the abolition of import duties already mentioned, this means that the barriers and costs of accessing the EU, the largest market in the world, could be swept aside.
The coverage of this trade package within the Association Agreement with Ukraine will also be exceptionally broad – including issues like the rules on public purchasing or on competition. This means that the laws, standards and eventually also practices on government procurement and competition will be sufficiently similar in the Ukraine to the ones of the EU. In negotiating this type of deal, the EU is making an unprecedented offer of deep integration with its own market. The aim is creation of a modern, transparent and predictable environment for consumers, investors and business people in both markets.
In the European Parliament it should be reminded this trade relations operate in the broader political context of overall relationship with Ukraine so that recent developments in Kiev have put all negotiations into question. But as High Representative Ashton said they should not walk away and should continue talking. Their offer of concluding the trade negotiations as part of the Association Agreement with Ukraine should remain on the table.
It is really important, that in the face of economic challenges, Europe has the courage and confidence not to retreat into the false security of protectionist tendencies. Not for us the cold comfort of closed markets – because all we know the risks that this runs. Instead we are outward looking and opening opportunities through trade.
So, the trade negotiations with Ukraine are a perfect example of a win-win outcome. The deep and comprehensive free trade area, envisaged in the context of the Association Agreement, will be of mutual economic benefit both to the EU and Ukraine. It will open each others' markets, it would modernize and diversify Ukraine's economy, and, most important of all, it will be a milestone in sharing common European values and standards; and in the coming days or weeks the political context can be created for this deal to materialize.
Winfried Schneider-Deters for 30 years served as director of various bilateral and regional cooperation projects of Friedrich Ebert Foundation in South America, South Korea, Eastern Germany, Central Asia and in the Southern Caucasus and, from 1996 to 2000, in Ukraine. In Germany, he is a frequent commentator on contemporary Ukrainian affairs.
 
Ukraine playin' US for another bailout...
:eusa_eh:
Russia warns Ukraine opposition as protests continue
3 February 2014 ~ Russia has urged Ukrainian opposition leaders to end their campaign of "ultimatums and threats" and to step up negotiations with the government.
Russia's foreign ministry said Moscow was concerned by activists' attempts to "inflame" the situation. Protesters in Kiev have repeated their calls for the resignation of President Viktor Yanukovych, who is now back at work after four days of illness. The EU and US are considering a big loan to help debt-laden Ukraine. "We are looking at how we could support the Ukraine in the times of the crisis when it comes to the economic and political situation," a spokeswoman for EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said on Monday.

No further details of the plan have been revealed, but both EU and US officials said it would be conditional on Kiev embracing "real reform". European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso insisted that the EU was not going to enter into a "bidding competition" with Russia to win Ukraine's loyalty. Russia promised a $15bn (£9bn) aid package to Ukraine last year, but has indicated the next tranche will not be given until a new government is formed, following the resignation of the prime minister and cabinet last week.

_72725937_020890770-1.jpg

Protesters want to see closer ties with the EU rather than Russia

'Deep crisis'

Ukraine's unrest began in November, when President Yanukovych backed away from a planned trade deal with the EU, and instead agreed a loan with Russia. The move sparked large scale protests in Kiev, which worsened and became deadly after new anti-protest laws were briefly put in place in January. On Sunday, thousands of people joined a new rally in the centre of the capital, Kiev, with opposition leaders calling for international help.

The Russian foreign ministry denounced their actions in a statement on Monday, saying they were particularly "puzzling" in the wake of a summit held in Munich last week on Ukraine's future. "We expect the opposition in Ukraine to avoid threats and ultimatums and step up dialogue with the authorities in order to finding a constitutional way out of the country's deep crisis," the foreign ministry said.

'No to extremism'

See also:

Corruption across EU 'breathtaking' - EU Commission
3 February 2014 ~ The extent of corruption in Europe is "breathtaking" and it costs the EU economy at least 120bn euros (£99bn) annually, the European Commission says.
EU Home Affairs Commissioner Cecilia Malmstroem has presented a full report on the problem. She said the true cost of corruption was "probably much higher" than 120bn. Three-quarters of Europeans surveyed for the Commission study said that corruption was widespread, and more than half said the level had increased. "The extent of the problem in Europe is breathtaking, although Sweden is among the countries with the least problems," Ms Malmstroem wrote in Sweden's Goeteborgs-Posten daily. The cost to the EU economy is equivalent to the bloc's annual budget. For the report the Commission studied corruption in all 28 EU member states. The Commission says it is the first time it has done such a survey.

Bribery widespread

National governments, rather than EU institutions, are chiefly responsible for fighting corruption in the EU. But Ms Malmstroem said national governments and the European Parliament had asked the Commission to carry out the EU-wide study. The Commission drafts EU laws and enforces compliance with EU treaties. In the UK only five people out of 1,115 - less than 1% - said they had been expected to pay a bribe. It was "the best result in all Europe", the report said. But 64% of British respondents said they believed corruption to be widespread in the UK, while the EU average was 74% on that question. In some countries there was a relatively high number reporting personal experience of bribery.

_72724992_eu_corruption_labels_624map(3).gif


In Croatia, the Czech Republic, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania and Greece, between 6% and 29% of respondents said they had been asked for a bribe, or had been expected to pay one, in the past 12 months. There were also high levels of bribery in Poland (15%), Slovakia (14%) and Hungary (13%), where the most prevalent instances were in healthcare. Ms Malmstroem said corruption was eroding trust in democracy and draining resources from the legal economy. "The political commitment to really root out corruption seems to be missing," she complained. The EU has an anti-fraud agency, Olaf, which focuses on fraud and corruption affecting the EU budget, but it has limited resources. In 2011 its budget was just 23.5m euros.

The Commission highlighted that:

*Public procurement (public bodies buying goods and services) forms about one-fifth of the EU's total output (GDP) and is vulnerable to corruption, so better controls and integrity standards are needed
*Corruption risks are generally greater at local and regional level
*Many shortcomings remain in financing of political parties - often codes of conduct are not tough enough
*Often the existing rules on conflicts of interest are inadequately enforced
*The quality of corruption investigations varies widely across the EU

Swedish model
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top