Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,383
- 2,180
Data can need adjusted so it can be blended with other data.
For example, the unemployment rate is seasonally adjusted. Better start running down the street & screaming "OMG OMG OMG" to that one.
No Dave, you don't 'adjust' data and then expect to have a reliable statistical outcome. This is the problem with AGW, the data is cherry-picked to align with the already determined conclusion.
Wrong.
You always have to adjust data.
For example, when you want to check balance of trade against the past, you have to adjust for the increase in GPD and inflation instead of using gross numbers.
There is no cherry picking with AGW research. There is absolutely no incentive to do that. The only ones with a motive to lie are the ones making profits from selling fossil fuels. Scientists are not paid more for findings on AGW.
You can't compare data with economics, what the hell?