Proof of AGW fraud

[SSDD]

• Air Temperature
  USCRN stations are equipped with three independent thermometers which measure air temperature in degrees Celsius. The station's datalogger computes independent 5-minute averages using two-second readings from each thermometer. These multiple measurements are then used to derive the station's official hourly temperature value.

OMG OMG OMG they are measuring temperature OMG OMG OMG

Interesting that you bring up USCRN...USCRN stands for the United States Climate Reference Network...it is a triple redundant data gathering network placed so pristinely that no "adjustments" are needed on the data...and do you know what? It has shown that the US has been cooling ever since it went on line...It is in direct opposition to the mainline temperature data bases...The only network in the world that doesn't require adjustment by climate science shows a cooling trend...all the networks that require adjustment by climate science show warming...

 

[Grumblenuts]

you miss the entire point, of man wasn't around, so natural CO2 can be that high in our world

No, you missed it. If anything, man not being around yet is indicative of conditions that do not support human life..

Not to mention amphibians, insects, reptiles, dinosaurs, mammals, and birds..

multicellular life..

Why do you hate life?

 

[Billy_Bob]

you miss the entire point, of man wasn't around, so natural CO2 can be that high in our world

No, you missed it. If anything, man not being around yet is indicative of conditions that do not support human life..

Not to mention amphibians, insects, reptiles, dinosaurs, mammals, and birds..

multicellular life..

Why do you hate life?

And yet the earth regulated its temperature within a 12 deg C range... Without missing a beat.... Your CO2 monster is dead. Quit flogging it..

 

[sparky]

I have the proof

nope

~S~

 

[jc456]

you miss the entire point, of man wasn't around, so natural CO2 can be that high in our world

No, you missed it. If anything, man not being around yet is indicative of conditions that do not support human life..

Not to mention amphibians, insects, reptiles, dinosaurs, mammals, and birds..

multicellular life..

Why do you hate life?

Then there weren’t any plants, trees nothing living? I guess no fossil fuels then

 

[Grumblenuts]

Why do you corporate fascists hate life so much? Never mind "We don't want people to vote." You guys don't want people period.

And yet the earth regulated its temperature within a 12 deg C range... Without missing a beat....

Yep, "without missing a beat" you just exposed yourself as never really giving a shit about any of this. Whether one presumes your "12 deg C range" accurate or not, what's crystal clear is your belief that humans can easily adapt to any conditions that may manifest within that range. IN OTHER WORDS, you don't really give a flying fuck about CO2 concentrations at all! NEVER HAVE. NEVER WILL Yet you persist in pretending to.. . practically every goddamn day here.. Fine admission! You may stop the charade any time now..

 

[Wuwei]

been through it all before...don't intend to endure the tedium of it again...you lied..you are a liar, and I am not interested in rehashing your defeats over and over to satisfy some masochistic personality quirk you have acquired

I have always stood by science. Science remains undefeated. Your fake science has been defeated time and again whether you know it or not. This topic is continued in the "Official Thread for Deniers etc" thread devoted to fake science.

.

 

[SSDD]

you miss the entire point, of man wasn't around, so natural CO2 can be that high in our world

No, you missed it. If anything, man not being around yet is indicative of conditions that do not support human life..

Not to mention amphibians, insects, reptiles, dinosaurs, mammals, and birds..

multicellular life..

Why do you hate life?

No...man not being around is evidence of the slow process of evolution...As your own source says, a warmer planet is better for life on earth. What do you believe the ideal temperature to be for life on earth. Surely not the relative cold of an ice age as we are in right now.

 

[SSDD]

Why do you corporate fascists hate life so much? Never mind "We don't want people to vote." You guys don't want people period.

Where do you get these ridiculous ideas? It is you and yours who want to remain in an ice age and gnash your teeth over even returning to the temperatures that existed prior to the onset of the little ice age. Tell me, what do you believe the ideal temperature is for life on planet earth?

 

[SSDD]

been through it all before...don't intend to endure the tedium of it again...you lied..you are a liar, and I am not interested in rehashing your defeats over and over to satisfy some masochistic personality quirk you have acquired

I have always stood by science. Science remains undefeated. Your fake science has been defeated time and again whether you know it or not. This topic is continued in the "Official Thread for Deniers etc" thread devoted to fake science.

.

You stand by your heavily manipulated, translated, altered version of science..anyone who must interpret the f'ing second law of thermodynamics in order to have "science" jibe with what he believes is OD...."out dere"

 

[SSDD]

Why do you corporate fascists hate life so much? Never mind "We don't want people to vote." You guys don't want people period.

And yet the earth regulated its temperature within a 12 deg C range... Without missing a beat....

Yep, "without missing a beat" you just exposed yourself as never really giving a shit about any of this. Whether one presumes your "12 deg C range" accurate or not, what's crystal clear is your belief that humans can easily adapt to any conditions that may manifest within that range. IN OTHER WORDS, you don't really give a flying fuck about CO2 concentrations at all! NEVER HAVE. NEVER WILL Yet you persist in pretending to.. . practically every goddamn day here.. Fine admission! You may stop the charade any time now..

Humans as we exist today arose and began the change from hunter gatherers to civilization builders during the holocene maximum...it was far warmer at that time, than it is at present...CO2 concentrations are irrelevant. But if you believe they are very important, how about you provide a single piece of observed, measured evidence which establishes a coherent relationship between the absorption of infrared radiation by a gas and warming in the atmosphere...

Just kidding...I don't really expect you to provide any such evidence.....because no such evidence exists...

 

[Wuwei]

You stand by your heavily manipulated, translated, altered version of science..anyone who must interpret the f'ing second law of thermodynamics in order to have "science" jibe with what he believes is OD...."out dere"

You know you are lying. My reply is in the
"Official Thread for Denial of GreenHouse Effect and Radiative Physics."
thread which is devoted to fake science.

.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

been through it all before...don't intend to endure the tedium of it again...you lied..you are a liar, and I am not interested in rehashing your defeats over and over to satisfy some masochistic personality quirk you have acquired

I have always stood by science. Science remains undefeated. Your fake science has been defeated time and again whether you know it or not. This topic is continued in the "Official Thread for Deniers etc" thread devoted to fake science.

.

You stand by your heavily manipulated, translated, altered version of science..anyone who must interpret the f'ing second law of thermodynamics in order to have "science" jibe with what he believes is OD...."out dere"

Dr. Raeder says you're wrong.

Who says you're right?

 

[Wuwei]

Dr. Raeder says you're wrong.

Who says you're right?

That's easy, billybob, JC, sunsettommy, crusaderfrank, westwall, and many other sock puppets.

.

 

[otto105]

you miss the entire point, of man wasn't around, so natural CO2 can be that high in our world

No, you missed it. If anything, man not being around yet is indicative of conditions that do not support human life..

Not to mention amphibians, insects, reptiles, dinosaurs, mammals, and birds..

multicellular life..

Why do you hate life?

No...man not being around is evidence of the slow process of evolution...As your own source says, a warmer planet is better for life on earth. What do you believe the ideal temperature to be for life on earth. Surely not the relative cold of an ice age as we are in right now.

What proof to convince anyone do you have to substantiate that we are in an "ice age"?


This should be entertaining.

 

[Sunsettommy]

you miss the entire point, of man wasn't around, so natural CO2 can be that high in our world

No, you missed it. If anything, man not being around yet is indicative of conditions that do not support human life..

Not to mention amphibians, insects, reptiles, dinosaurs, mammals, and birds..

multicellular life..

Why do you hate life?

No...man not being around is evidence of the slow process of evolution...As your own source says, a warmer planet is better for life on earth. What do you believe the ideal temperature to be for life on earth. Surely not the relative cold of an ice age as we are in right now.

What proof to convince anyone do you have to substantiate that we are in an "ice age"?


This should be entertaining.

We ARE in an Ice Age epoch right now!

There are two different stages of an ice age:

1) Glaciation, which ended roughly 13,000 year ago.
2) Interglacial, which is the CURRENT stage.

 

[jc456]

you miss the entire point, of man wasn't around, so natural CO2 can be that high in our world

No, you missed it. If anything, man not being around yet is indicative of conditions that do not support human life..

Not to mention amphibians, insects, reptiles, dinosaurs, mammals, and birds..

multicellular life..

Why do you hate life?

No...man not being around is evidence of the slow process of evolution...As your own source says, a warmer planet is better for life on earth. What do you believe the ideal temperature to be for life on earth. Surely not the relative cold of an ice age as we are in right now.

What proof to convince anyone do you have to substantiate that we are in an "ice age"?


This should be entertaining.

is there still ice on the planet? please tell me you haven't lost your own intelligence.

 

[otto105]

you miss the entire point, of man wasn't around, so natural CO2 can be that high in our world

No, you missed it. If anything, man not being around yet is indicative of conditions that do not support human life..

Not to mention amphibians, insects, reptiles, dinosaurs, mammals, and birds..

multicellular life..

Why do you hate life?

No...man not being around is evidence of the slow process of evolution...As your own source says, a warmer planet is better for life on earth. What do you believe the ideal temperature to be for life on earth. Surely not the relative cold of an ice age as we are in right now.

What proof to convince anyone do you have to substantiate that we are in an "ice age"?


This should be entertaining.

We ARE in an Ice Age epoch right now!

There are two different stages of an ice age:

1) Glaciation, which ended roughly 13,000 year ago.
2) Interglacial, which is the CURRENT stage.

Ya, were in-between Ice Ages, hence inter part.

 

[jc456]

Dr. Raeder says you're wrong.

Who says you're right?

That's easy, billybob, JC, sunsettommy, crusaderfrank, westwall, and many other sock puppets.

.

and still no observed empirical evidence. why not?

 

[jc456]

you miss the entire point, of man wasn't around, so natural CO2 can be that high in our world

No, you missed it. If anything, man not being around yet is indicative of conditions that do not support human life..

Not to mention amphibians, insects, reptiles, dinosaurs, mammals, and birds..

multicellular life..

Why do you hate life?

No...man not being around is evidence of the slow process of evolution...As your own source says, a warmer planet is better for life on earth. What do you believe the ideal temperature to be for life on earth. Surely not the relative cold of an ice age as we are in right now.

What proof to convince anyone do you have to substantiate that we are in an "ice age"?


This should be entertaining.

We ARE in an Ice Age epoch right now!

There are two different stages of an ice age:

1) Glaciation, which ended roughly 13,000 year ago.
2) Interglacial, which is the CURRENT stage.

Ya, were in-between Ice Ages, hence inter part.

why is there ice?