Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I am waiting for my apology NY carbineer.
I am not looking at the 'wrong' data. I am citing the more demographically relevant data.
you are dishonest and speaking with you is a dead loss, this is the third time at least you've popped off and decided to get vulgar and fling around accusations etc.
hey, do what you will , but, thats why you never wind up maintaining a civil conversation, and I think you do it on purpose, you cannot even comprehend the English language or a simple poll, so when you get ownded, which hapens frequently you respond with strawman or vulgarity, which is tantamount to covering your ears and yelling blah blah blah...infantile.
go read the single sentence they typed at the top of that data set and questions starting on page 56, those q's were not for calc in the poll, thats why they were phrased very loosely, the data set to calc. that results in that 60% were from the chart I posted , from page 37.
your latest defense makes no sense, what you say you now cited for whatever reason has no bearing on the poll sampling as to the result they accrued, and used in their release, they over sampled dems, slice it anyway you like and that is a fact, period.
I am not looking at the 'wrong' data. I am citing the more demographically relevant data.
you are dishonest and speaking with you is a dead loss, this is the third time at least you've popped off and decided to get vulgar and fling around accusations etc.
hey, do what you will , but, thats why you never wind up maintaining a civil conversation, and I think you do it on purpose, you cannot even comprehend the English language or a simple poll, so when you get ownded, which hapens frequently you respond with strawman or vulgarity, which is tantamount to covering your ears and yelling blah blah blah...infantile.
go read the single sentence they typed at the top of that data set and questions starting on page 56, those q's were not for calc in the poll, thats why they were phrased very loosely, the data set to calc. that results in that 60% were from the chart I posted , from page 37.
your latest defense makes no sense, what you say you now cited for whatever reason has no bearing on the poll sampling as to the result they accrued, and used in their release, they over sampled dems, slice it anyway you like and that is a fact, period.
The best of winning an argument with a rightwing nut is that rightwing nut code of never being able to admit when you're wrong. I call it the icing on the cake.
So let me ask you this:
If the poll had been 33% Republican, 33% Democrat, and 33% Independent, would you consider that a fair sampling?
I am waiting for my apology NY carbineer.
I am not looking at the 'wrong' data. I am citing the more demographically relevant data.
you are dishonest and speaking with you is a dead loss, this is the third time at least you've popped off and decided to get vulgar and fling around accusations etc.
hey, do what you will , but, thats why you never wind up maintaining a civil conversation, and I think you do it on purpose, you cannot even comprehend the English language or a simple poll, so when you get ownded, which hapens frequently you respond with strawman or vulgarity, which is tantamount to covering your ears and yelling blah blah blah...infantile.
go read the single sentence they typed at the top of that data set and questions starting on page 56, those q's were not for calc in the poll, thats why they were phrased very loosely, the data set to calc. that results in that 60% were from the chart I posted , from page 37.
your latest defense makes no sense, what you say you now cited for whatever reason has no bearing on the poll sampling as to the result they accrued, and used in their release, they over sampled dems, slice it anyway you like and that is a fact, period.
you are dishonest and speaking with you is a dead loss, this is the third time at least you've popped off and decided to get vulgar and fling around accusations etc.
hey, do what you will , but, thats why you never wind up maintaining a civil conversation, and I think you do it on purpose, you cannot even comprehend the English language or a simple poll, so when you get ownded, which hapens frequently you respond with strawman or vulgarity, which is tantamount to covering your ears and yelling blah blah blah...infantile.
go read the single sentence they typed at the top of that data set and questions starting on page 56, those q's were not for calc in the poll, thats why they were phrased very loosely, the data set to calc. that results in that 60% were from the chart I posted , from page 37.
your latest defense makes no sense, what you say you now cited for whatever reason has no bearing on the poll sampling as to the result they accrued, and used in their release, they over sampled dems, slice it anyway you like and that is a fact, period.
The best of winning an argument with a rightwing nut is that rightwing nut code of never being able to admit when you're wrong. I call it the icing on the cake.
So let me ask you this:
If the poll had been 33% Republican, 33% Democrat, and 33% Independent, would you consider that a fair sampling?
The POLL wasn't conducted that way...was it?
Nice deflection Carbonated. NO Joy.
I am not looking at the 'wrong' data. I am citing the more demographically relevant data.
you are dishonest and speaking with you is a dead loss, this is the third time at least you've popped off and decided to get vulgar and fling around accusations etc.
hey, do what you will , but, thats why you never wind up maintaining a civil conversation, and I think you do it on purpose, you cannot even comprehend the English language or a simple poll, so when you get ownded, which hapens frequently you respond with strawman or vulgarity, which is tantamount to covering your ears and yelling blah blah blah...infantile.
go read the single sentence they typed at the top of that data set and questions starting on page 56, those q's were not for calc in the poll, thats why they were phrased very loosely, the data set to calc. that results in that 60% were from the chart I posted , from page 37.
your latest defense makes no sense, what you say you now cited for whatever reason has no bearing on the poll sampling as to the result they accrued, and used in their release, they over sampled dems, slice it anyway you like and that is a fact, period.
There is no sentence of any relevance.
The FACT is they polled only 23% Liberals and 38% Conservatives, which is a perfectly acceptable ratio.
you are dishonest and speaking with you is a dead loss, this is the third time at least you've popped off and decided to get vulgar and fling around accusations etc.
hey, do what you will , but, thats why you never wind up maintaining a civil conversation, and I think you do it on purpose, you cannot even comprehend the English language or a simple poll, so when you get ownded, which hapens frequently you respond with strawman or vulgarity, which is tantamount to covering your ears and yelling blah blah blah...infantile.
go read the single sentence they typed at the top of that data set and questions starting on page 56, those q's were not for calc in the poll, thats why they were phrased very loosely, the data set to calc. that results in that 60% were from the chart I posted , from page 37.
your latest defense makes no sense, what you say you now cited for whatever reason has no bearing on the poll sampling as to the result they accrued, and used in their release, they over sampled dems, slice it anyway you like and that is a fact, period.
There is no sentence of any relevance.
The FACT is they polled only 23% Liberals and 38% Conservatives, which is a perfectly acceptable ratio.
you need help, I am not even kidding.
It's going to be fun watching the Republicans flounder.
The American people are starting to get it.
what color is it?
The only way the Republicans can win is through voter suppression.
That is why they are rushing voter ID bills through the state legislatures.
There is no evil in the world that the Republican Party won't support.
Sucks being a dress size 14 huh?
Go suck a ding-dong. And shove a Twinkie up your ass
i wouldn't know about a size 14.
but how's that manziere treating you?
you really need to stop projecting your weight problems onto others. most of us know when to stop stuffing our faces.
unlike you. [r]ight, troll?
I figured I was low-balling with a size 14, you fat bitch. Thanks for manning up to a larger size. Now, get on to munching that Supersized Big Mac fat-ass.
he doesn't need 60% to get re-elected.
True. Americans have a habit of voting idiots into office.
i think perhaps it's time for the right to stop the meme that he's somehow an idiot. just because bush really WAS an idiot, doesn't mean that in some weird type of "i know you are, but what am i" thing, that obama is, too.
i wouldn't know about a size 14.
but how's that manziere treating you?
you really need to stop projecting your weight problems onto others. most of us know when to stop stuffing our faces.
unlike you. [r]ight, troll?
I figured I was low-balling with a size 14, you fat bitch. Thanks for manning up to a larger size. Now, get on to munching that Supersized Big Mac fat-ass.
Jillian....I think you hit a nerve with That One.
President Obama could be in the 20s and still beat the batch of losers the GnOP has put forth so far...
Yay. Great for our country. Let's re-float an absolute disaster just because the other side can't compete.
Meaning: The Dem's could oust this total fuck-up on their own.
But they won't. Too busy being about winning by hook or crook or give a damn about right and/or wrong.
Isn't that what capitalism is...Competition?
One wins, the other(s) loses.
Stop crying...MAN UP!
you are dishonest and speaking with you is a dead loss, this is the third time at least you've popped off and decided to get vulgar and fling around accusations etc.
hey, do what you will , but, thats why you never wind up maintaining a civil conversation, and I think you do it on purpose, you cannot even comprehend the English language or a simple poll, so when you get ownded, which hapens frequently you respond with strawman or vulgarity, which is tantamount to covering your ears and yelling blah blah blah...infantile.
go read the single sentence they typed at the top of that data set and questions starting on page 56, those q's were not for calc in the poll, thats why they were phrased very loosely, the data set to calc. that results in that 60% were from the chart I posted , from page 37.
your latest defense makes no sense, what you say you now cited for whatever reason has no bearing on the poll sampling as to the result they accrued, and used in their release, they over sampled dems, slice it anyway you like and that is a fact, period.
There is no sentence of any relevance.
The FACT is they polled only 23% Liberals and 38% Conservatives, which is a perfectly acceptable ratio.
you need help, I am not even kidding.
I am not looking at the 'wrong' data. I am citing the more demographically relevant data.
you are dishonest and speaking with you is a dead loss, this is the third time at least you've popped off and decided to get vulgar and fling around accusations etc.
hey, do what you will , but, thats why you never wind up maintaining a civil conversation, and I think you do it on purpose, you cannot even comprehend the English language or a simple poll, so when you get ownded, which hapens frequently you respond with strawman or vulgarity, which is tantamount to covering your ears and yelling blah blah blah...infantile.
go read the single sentence they typed at the top of that data set and questions starting on page 56, those q's were not for calc in the poll, thats why they were phrased very loosely, the data set to calc. that results in that 60% were from the chart I posted , from page 37.
your latest defense makes no sense, what you say you now cited for whatever reason has no bearing on the poll sampling as to the result they accrued, and used in their release, they over sampled dems, slice it anyway you like and that is a fact, period.
The best of winning an argument with a rightwing nut is that rightwing nut code of never being able to admit when you're wrong. I call it the icing on the cake.
So let me ask you this:
If the poll had been 33% Republican, 33% Democrat, and 33% Independent, would you consider that a fair sampling?
Prove it...whiner.Yay. Great for our country. Let's re-float an absolute disaster just because the other side can't compete.
Meaning: The Dem's could oust this total fuck-up on their own.
But they won't. Too busy being about winning by hook or crook or give a damn about right and/or wrong.
Isn't that what capitalism is...Competition?
One wins, the other(s) loses.
Stop crying...MAN UP!
You didn't pay Bush that same courtesy. Hypocrite.
