President roosevelt: "the economic bill of rights"

shock

Rookie
Apr 9, 2009
258
18
0
PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT: "THE ECONOMIC BILL OF RIGHTS"


"***


“The Economic Bill of Rights”

Excerpt from President Roosevelt's January 11, 1944 message to the Congress of the United States on the State of the Union

"It is our duty now to begin to lay the plans and determine the strategy for the winning of a lasting peace and the establishment of an American standard of living higher than ever before known. We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth—is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure.

This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

As our nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.” People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

America’s own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for our citizens.

Source: The Public Papers & Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt (Samuel Rosenman, ed.), Vol XIII (NY: Harper, 1950), 40-42

Franklin D. Roosevelt - American Heritage Center, Inc."<!-- google_ad_section_end -->

======================================================

Roosevelt's words convey as much meaning as they did when first uttered,
and they are as timely today as they were then.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
Brilliant.
===============

you bet it is

it shines like a mackerel rotting in the moonlight
(John Randolph)
 
FDR averaged 20% unemployment from his inauguration until Hitler conquered France.

That's worse than the 7 Biblical Lean Years
 
PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT: "THE ECONOMIC BILL OF RIGHTS"


"***


“The Economic Bill of Rights”

Excerpt from President Roosevelt's January 11, 1944 message to the Congress of the United States on the State of the Union

"It is our duty now to begin to lay the plans and determine the strategy for the winning of a lasting peace and the establishment of an American standard of living higher than ever before known. We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth—is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure.

This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

As our nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.” People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

America’s own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for our citizens.

Source: The Public Papers & Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt (Samuel Rosenman, ed.), Vol XIII (NY: Harper, 1950), 40-42

Franklin D. Roosevelt - American Heritage Center, Inc."<!-- google_ad_section_end -->

======================================================

Roosevelt's words convey as much meaning as they did when first uttered,
and they are as timely today as they were then.

FDR... Good wartime president, other than that, sucked ass.
 
FUCK FDR!


Harding>HDR the proof is in the economy and the Depression solved vs the depression extended.


Unless you like Depressions =D
 
Maybe because FDR gave people hope. And he did give people somethings to hope for in the New Deal legislation. At least a Democrat will do something for the little guy. Ask yourself, what has a Republican ever done for you? Nothing, nada, zilch. Its the party of the rich, told to me by my great grandfather who was born in 1870 and it's true to this day.
 
Fdr and Obama, uphill battles. Trying to save an economy destroyed by years of Republican administrations. Kind of hard to raise the titanic overnight especially when republicans make it a mission to destroy you even if they take the country down with them.


FDR: one of the worst Presidents ever
 
At least a Democrat will do something for the little guy.


You mean do something to the little guy, like make damn sure he stays little and is always dependent on papa government as he's supposed to be.
 
One example. The ACA or Obamacare will increase the amount of needy and especially children who become eligible for Medicaid. These are the needy and this talk of people becoming dependent on government is right out of the book of Rush, or maybe Reagan. Don't matter. It will save lives. Now we know that many large corporations are dependent on govermnent. Look at all the lobbyists in D.C. I think the needy are more important than those trying to increase their profit margin.






At least a Democrat will do something for the little guy.


You mean do something to the little guy, like make damn sure he stays little and is always dependent on papa government as he's supposed to be.
 
One example. The ACA or Obamacare will increase the amount of needy and especially children who become eligible for Medicaid. These are the needy and this talk of people becoming dependent on government is right out of the book of Rush, or maybe Reagan. Don't matter. It will save lives. Now we know that many large corporations are dependent on govermnent. Look at all the lobbyists in D.C. I think the needy are more important than those trying to increase their profit margin.






At least a Democrat will do something for the little guy.


You mean do something to the little guy, like make damn sure he stays little and is always dependent on papa government as he's supposed to be.



Liberals are sometimes accidentally honest about what they really want.
 
However, if enough middle aged people actually look into Paul Ryans vision for America, and Romney's approval of Ryan, they might have second thoughts, especially about turning Medicare into a voucher system. Let's start refering to the Republican party as the voucher party.

Nutters pretending to care about history is fun.
 
One big difference between FDR and Obama is the latter's lack of interest in uncovering the causes of the Great Recession:

"Following the 1929 Wall Street Crash, the U.S. economy had gone into a depression, and a large number of banks failed. The Pecora Investigation sought to uncover the causes of the financial collapse.

"As chief counsel, Ferdinand Pecora personally examined many high-profile witnesses, who included some of the nation's most influential bankers and stockbrokers..."

"Given wide media coverage, the testimony of the powerful banker J.P. Morgan, Jr. caused a public outcry after he admitted under examination that he and many of his partners had not paid any income taxes in 1931 and 1932."

JP, Jr might've won this year's White House Auction.

Pecora Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
My grandparents were Southern Democrats and looked forward to Social Security, although they hated FDR. All those conservative Democrats are now registered republicans .... same basic politics ... Conservative.
 
So, what gives FDR or any other person the power to decide what is a right and what isn't? We have a Constitution and a Bill of Rights, if we're going to create new rights then shouldn't we amend the constitution and do it legally? If a state wants to grant a new right to it's citizens, that's cool assuming they have a referendum on a ballot to amend their state constitution and their state supreme court okays it. But nation-wide, based on one person's concept or that of one political party? I don't think so. Seems to me that we should all have a say in it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top