Prayer is needed for Hillary Clinton TODAY!!!

Freewill

Platinum Member
Oct 26, 2011
31,158
5,072
1,130
Sorry I didn't see this life threatening news sooner. Prayer is needed before her 0900 appointment. I am guessing a brain aneurysm or maybe hooping cough may cause her not to testify. I pray for her good health.


Congress Set to Question Hillary Clinton on Security Failures in Benghazi

Congress Set to Question Hillary Clinton on Security Failures in Benghazi - ABC News

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is scheduled to be on Capitol Hill Wednesday, to give long-awaited testimony about State Department security and the attack that left four Americans dead in Benghazi, Libya.

Clinton, who had to postpone testimony because of health issues, is scheduled to appear before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at 9 a.m. and the House Foreign Affairs Committee at 2 p.m. Wednesday. She will be the only person giving testimony in the hearing called, “Terrorist Attack in Benghazi: The Secretary of State’s View.”

More than four months have passed since an act of terrorism killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans in Libya. Clinton was expected to testify about a report on security failures in Benghazi in December, but first a concussion and then a blood clot near her brain kept the out-going secretary of state away from Capitol Hill.
 
Was just watchin FOX in the breakroom for a few minutes.

Apparantly the marines were set to deploy to Benghazi when they were told to deplane and change out of their uniforms and into something else. Not sure what the else is but it delayed them 90 minutes. By the time they got ready it was already to late.

Apparantly someone spoke with General Ham as well. You know Ham who was recalled a few days after Benghazi and relieved of command.

I'm sure Hillary will make good use of not recalling much. Head injury and all. She's already assumed responsibility for Benghazi. Of course she won't lose her job but what the hey. She is assuming responsibility. No one in her sucky State Department will lose a job or anything else but I'm sure the families of the victims will appreciate her taking the blame.
 
As you can by the board today, and as I brilliantly predicted,

the rightwing herd doesn't care about this issue anymore. Their short attention span meter expired,

such are the limitations of small minds.
 
As you can by the board today, and as I brilliantly predicted,

the rightwing herd doesn't care about this issue anymore. Their short attention span meter expired,

such are the limitations of small minds.

The Left wing never cared about this issue. The lost American lives were expendable, in their minds.
 
As you can by the board today, and as I brilliantly predicted,

the rightwing herd doesn't care about this issue anymore. Their short attention span meter expired,

such are the limitations of small minds.
oh we care !! and i would not put it past Hillary to spill the beans on Obama !!
 
For The Left, Benghazi was a stark reminder that while bin Laden is dead, Al Qaeda is alive and well. This is what Bush meant when he said that shutting down Al Qaeda was more important than getting bin Laden (read: the sum of the parts is greater than the head)....but the left keeps parading their bin Laden trophy. The same people celebrating bin Laden's head are still upset that Saddam Hussein was photographed in his underwear and suffered humiliation.
 
For The Left, Benghazi was a stark reminder that while bin Laden is dead, Al Qaeda is alive and well. This is what Bush meant when he said that shutting down Al Qaeda was more important than getting bin Laden (read: the sum of the parts is greater than the head)....but the left keeps parading their bin Laden trophy. The same people celebrating bin Laden's head are still upset that Saddam Hussein was photographed in his underwear and suffered humiliation.

Bush wasn't shutting down Al Qaeda by attacking Iraq.

He actually did the opposite.
 
For The Left, Benghazi was a stark reminder that while bin Laden is dead, Al Qaeda is alive and well. This is what Bush meant when he said that shutting down Al Qaeda was more important than getting bin Laden (read: the sum of the parts is greater than the head)....but the left keeps parading their bin Laden trophy. The same people celebrating bin Laden's head are still upset that Saddam Hussein was photographed in his underwear and suffered humiliation.

Bush wasn't shutting down Al Qaeda by attacking Iraq.

He actually did the opposite.

Check your history....Al Qaeda flooded Iraq when the US took out Saddam. It was through this action we were able to capture many Al Qaeda and build the intel infrastructure that staved off future attacks on US soil. What volume or significant Al Qaeda did we capture or kill in Afghanastan? You were not going to draw Al Qaeda into the battlefield in Afghanastan. Iraq was more significant to Al Qaeda to come out and fight. Not to discount Afghanastan, but Iraq was necessary first and foremost because Saddam was a threat to the US and it enabled us to take the fight to Al Qaeda rather than curl up in the fetal position and wait for another US attack.
 
Sorry I didn't see this life threatening news sooner. Prayer is needed before her 0900 appointment. I am guessing a brain aneurysm or maybe hooping cough may cause her not to testify. I pray for her good health.


Congress Set to Question Hillary Clinton on Security Failures in Benghazi

Congress Set to Question Hillary Clinton on Security Failures in Benghazi - ABC News

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is scheduled to be on Capitol Hill Wednesday, to give long-awaited testimony about State Department security and the attack that left four Americans dead in Benghazi, Libya.

Clinton, who had to postpone testimony because of health issues, is scheduled to appear before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at 9 a.m. and the House Foreign Affairs Committee at 2 p.m. Wednesday. She will be the only person giving testimony in the hearing called, “Terrorist Attack in Benghazi: The Secretary of State’s View.”

More than four months have passed since an act of terrorism killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans in Libya. Clinton was expected to testify about a report on security failures in Benghazi in December, but first a concussion and then a blood clot near her brain kept the out-going secretary of state away from Capitol Hill.

Be respectful.

She's going to be your President in four years.
 
As you can by the board today, and as I brilliantly predicted,

the rightwing herd doesn't care about this issue anymore. Their short attention span meter expired,

such are the limitations of small minds.

The Left wing never cared about this issue. The lost American lives were expendable, in their minds.

Are you talking to me?

Why don't you tell me what my position on Libya has been, and how you know what it's been, if you're so smart.
 
As you can by the board today, and as I brilliantly predicted,

the rightwing herd doesn't care about this issue anymore. Their short attention span meter expired,

such are the limitations of small minds.
oh we care !! and i would not put it past Hillary to spill the beans on Obama !!

Obama has nothing fear with Hilary's testimony.

Hilary is a liar, expertly taught by the impeached rapist, her husband of convenience.
 
For The Left, Benghazi was a stark reminder that while bin Laden is dead, Al Qaeda is alive and well. This is what Bush meant when he said that shutting down Al Qaeda was more important than getting bin Laden (read: the sum of the parts is greater than the head)....but the left keeps parading their bin Laden trophy. The same people celebrating bin Laden's head are still upset that Saddam Hussein was photographed in his underwear and suffered humiliation.

Bush wasn't shutting down Al Qaeda by attacking Iraq.

He actually did the opposite.

Check your history....Al Qaeda flooded Iraq when the US took out Saddam. It was through this action we were able to capture many Al Qaeda and build the intel infrastructure that staved off future attacks on US soil. What volume or significant Al Qaeda did we capture or kill in Afghanastan? You were not going to draw Al Qaeda into the battlefield in Afghanastan. Iraq was more significant to Al Qaeda to come out and fight. Not to discount Afghanastan, but Iraq was necessary first and foremost because Saddam was a threat to the US and it enabled us to take the fight to Al Qaeda rather than curl up in the fetal position and wait for another US attack.

Very sad. You must feel extreme guilt and shame to have to resort to that sort of rationalization.
 
I hope that they start asking her substantive questions because this looks like it was written by a screenwriter.
 

Forum List

Back
Top