JBeukema
Rookie
- Banned
- #61
God is not about proving he exists. That would remove free will
Then Adam and Eve had no free will (since they had physical proof of god's existence- they'd seen him) and therefore they could not sin of their own accord. You just debunked your entire religion the moment your moronic assertion is accepted.
Care to try again?
This is kinda like you attributing words to jesus and then running away when I ask you for book, chapter, and verse
Moron. Gee no wonder you are so stupid about religion. Adam and Eve sinned because they were ordered not to eat from the one tree of Knowledge.
Did they have the free will to do so? They had proof god existed.
God is not about proving he exists. That would remove free will
Without free will, actions are meaningless and there can be no 'sin' in any meaningful sense as one cannot disobey if one does not have free will.
But then no one that I know of has accused you of being very bright.
Freewill applies to everyone even those few that actually saw God.
+
God is not about proving he exists. That would remove free will
=
self contradiction. If free will applies to those who've seen god, then clearly god proving his existence doesn't 'remove free will'. You're refuting yourself for me and I don't have to do anything but watch
.
And the fact Adam and Eve ate from the tree is ACTUALLY evidence that supports free will dumb ass. God ordered them not to eat from it, yet they did. Go figure Einstein.
So you recant your moronic assertion that
?God is not about proving he exists. That would remove free will