EverCurious
Gold Member
So, in light of the 6 officers now being charged for murder and facing prison time in Baltimore because they failed to follow the JUST INSTATED policy of buckling up suspects in the van - can we revisit how Popeye's was in the wrong to fire this woman for repeatedly not following company policy?
First you have to prove that she wasn't following company policy. Just because the manager, who we have not deduced is rather dumb, said so, doesn't mean it's true.
That doesn't seem to be the case in police vs unarmed criminal cases, but it's pretty easy so what the hell; the company said flat out that she repeatedly didn't follow the policy. Or are you arguing they lied about her not following policy? You don't see that as a bit far fetched? Like the manager's are sitting around going "That bitch lost us $400 so lets can her ass!" Give me a break.
However, that wasn't really the point of my statement. The point of my statement relates to my previous discussion about policies, and why it's not "unfair" to fire someone for failing to follow a company policy; and especially someone who is supposed to be setting an example for other employees.
I'm also having a bit of a struggle to understand how so many can want to punish the franchise owners for firing this girl for repeatedly failing to follow company policy, but then flip it and want to punish police officers for failing to follow a policy which had just gone into effect 9 days beforehand. This simply doesn't make sense to me so I'd some opinions with which to rectify that "missing bit" in my comprehension, (if it's even possible for me to understand... To be completely honest at the moment it very much seems to me that a lot of folks have zero respect for policy, unless it suits their purpose - of suing the company, of getting an officer put in jail, etc. I'd rather think I'm wrong about that though...)