Pets are being given up as owners struggle to pay bills

So the more distant the human relation the better it is to kill them?

:auiqs.jpg:
Better? No. It is However less detrimental to your common genetic continuity, if more closely related examples survive, however the more distant might die.

You aren't even role playing... You really are this stupid. Though it probably goes quite a bit deeper than, even that in your case.
 
Better? No. It is However less detrimental to your common genetic continuity, if more closely related examples survive, however the more distant might die.

You aren't even role playing... You really are this stupid. Though it probably goes quite a bit deeper than, even that in your case.
You murder things based on how genetically close they are to you, and you call me stupid?

Psychopath.
 
What say you? Do you agree with your cohort? Is human value equated with how close they are to you genetically?

I am not sure how much it has to do with genetics, more a function of how close we are to the person.

I did not shed a single tear or extra thought when my father died as I had not seen him for close to 30 years. I was far more upset about Jimmy Buffett dying as he held more value in my life.

My wife was close with both her parents and was much more impacted by their deaths as they held more value to her.

But, I do not think I will ever be like you and think it is worse when a dog dies than a human.
 
I am not sure how much it has to do with genetics, more a function of how close we are to the person.

I did not shed a single tear or extra thought when my father died as I had not seen him for close to 30 years. I was far more upset about Jimmy Buffett dying as he held more value in my life.

My wife was close with both her parents and was much more impacted by their deaths as they held more value to her.

But, I do not think I will ever be like you and think it is worse when a dog dies than a human.
So, you cry over a dog but not your dad.

Not sure what to say other than, sorry.

That is sad as hell.
 
If the DemoKKKrats get their way, people will be forced to eat their pets, like they did in Venezuela.

This is Joe Biden's America.
Golfing Gator won't let you, but Vastator will assuming the genetics is not too close to his own.
 

Even Pets are suffering and being euthanized because of Biden's economy and pet care inflation.
I frankly don't care. I have always noticed how people baby their pets, then scowl at the homeless begging for help on street corners. Yes, some of them are druggies and/or unsympathetic in other ways, but... well, for one, Scripture has a few things to s ay about this, one thing being

Give to those who ask. It doesn't say Give to those who look perfect to you (or whatever)

Then there is good old Luke 16:19

and Matthew 25:31
 
All Leftists value animal life over human life

In fact, this is the legislation that the National Socialists of Germany passed with Hitler.


And in the US.

View attachment 829189
thanks

didn't know that about Hitler protecting animals.

Talk about F'd up values!
 
San Francisco adoption costs: Dogs - $250. Puppies - $400. Kittens - $200. Plus city fee of $28. Every family member must be present at an adoption. Keep in mind, this is a Marxist hub which values animals over children. You must be vetted, you must present an ID, and you must have a letter of approval from your landlord or must present a deed of home ownership.

Here in red-state America, we just got a kitten, 8 weeks old from an individuaI. I gave the girl $25 for her trouble. Just called her and picked up the kitten.
You have to have ID to get an animal in need

but voting.. you don't need anything for that! We're letting the retards run everything
 
thanks

didn't know that about Hitler protecting animals.

Talk about F'd up values!
It is frightening.

But those are the kind of world leaders we get.

Very scary indeed.

Vastrator here thinks killing is wrong if their genetics are close to your own, but I would have no problem hanging the Nazi scum that murdered all those people in those camps no matter how close their genetics were to me, but would feel horrible about killing one of their dogs.

It is all about valuing human life and justice for those who don't so you can put a stop to them.
 
If I could educate you blue-staters, in my neck of the woods, people who live out in the country don't treat cats like family members; they treat them like the animals they are. Death among animals is commonplace. Hunting is a way of life. And so they might not spay every female cat that roams the area. But they don't need to because nature takes care of any surplus. Maybe one kitten is taken by a hawk. Perhaps another by a fox. And so there isn't an overpopulation problem. And the folks don't think twice about it.

The problem in all this is you are assigning your hyper-liberal animal rights values to people who don't subscribe to it. The pretty country gal I got the kitty from doesn't care what you think.

You actually sound proud of that lack of mercy and decency. Now I've really seen it all. :rolleyes:

PS: It has nothing to do with politics, so don't try to make everything into a red vs blue thing.
 
It is frightening.

But those are the kind of world leaders we get.

Very scary indeed.

Vastrator here thinks killing is wrong if their genetics are close to your own, but I would have no problem hanging the Nazi scum that murdered all those people in those camps no matter how close their genetics were to me, but would feel horrible about killing one of their dogs.

It is all about valuing human life and justice for those who don't so you can put a stop to them.
I didn't couch it in terms of right, or wrong. Simply pointed out the normal, natural proclivity.
 
I didn't couch it in terms of right, or wrong. Simply pointed out the normal, natural proclivity.
I don't base my morals on natural proclivity.

For example, before slavery was outlawed in the US in the 1800's, it was seen as Ok but not ideal.

However, decades after being outlawed it seems completely unacceptable.

The same thing can be said for abortion. Before Roe vs. Wade abortion was seen by most as morally wrong, but after Roe was legal for decades, most would say it is Ok but not ideal, just like slavery was seen at one time.

You sir are a moral lemming of the state, just like the lemmings who went along with the Jewish persecution lasting centuries in Europe.

The Holocaust was but the climax of such natural moral proclivity.
 
I don't base my morals on natural proclivity.

For example, before slavery was outlawed in the US in the 1800's, it was seen as Ok but not ideal.

However, decades after being outlawed it seems completely unacceptable.

The same thing can be said for abortion. Before Roe vs. Wade abortion was seen by most as morally wrong, but after Roe was legal for decades, most would say it is Ok but not ideal, just like slavery was seen at one time.

You sir are a moral lemming of the state, just like the lemmings who went along with the Jewish persecution lasting centuries in Europe.

The Holocaust was but the climax of such natural moral proclivity.
Now you're just rambling nonsensical word salad. Makes sense, given your "frame" of mind...
 
I frankly don't care. I have always noticed how people baby their pets, then scowl at the homeless begging for help on street corners. Yes, some of them are druggies and/or unsympathetic in other ways, but... well, for one, Scripture has a few things to s ay about this, one thing being

Give to those who ask. It doesn't say Give to those who look perfect to you (or whatever)

Then there is good old Luke 16:19

and Matthew 25:31
Jesus also said the poor will always be with you, now I do not treat my dogs better than humans. The homeless should come before illegals and they do not talk to your local democrat leader
 

Forum List

Back
Top