Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
SNIP:
When Fallon Resigned, Dems Criticized Bush for Punishing Truth Tellers
By Philip Klein on 6.23.10 @ 4:49PM
Today's ouster of Gen. Stanley McChrystal was the just the latest in a line of conflicts between top military commanders and presidents. But what's interesting is that the ouster of McChrystal is being portrayed as the proper course of action to restore unity and reinforce civilian control of the military, but when Admiral William Fallon resigned as head of Central Command in 2008, it was covered as if the Bush administration couldn't handle disagreements, and Democrats went on the attack.
For instance, here's the Bloomberg account:
Admiral William Fallon's resignation as U.S. commander in the Middle East provoked criticism that President George W. Bush won't tolerate dissent and fed speculation his Iran policy could become more confrontational.
``Congress needs to determine immediately whether Admiral Fallon's resignation is another example of truth tellers being forced to the sidelines in the Bush administration,'' said Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who lost to Bush in the 2004 election. ``His departure must not clear the way for a rush to war with Iran.''...
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, a U.S. senator from New York, called Fallon a ``sensible voice'' that supported ``engaging Iran.'' She urged her colleagues to back a bill requiring Bush to get congressional approval before taking any military action against Iran.
read the rest here.
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : When Fallon Resigned, Dems Criticized Bush for Punishing Truth Tellers
That is insubordination.
That is insubordination.
No, it is not:
Insubordination is the act of a subordinate deliberately disobeying a lawful order from someone in charge of them.
Yes, McChrystal acted in a way that was not becoming of an officer.
Yes, it was wrong.
No, our country did not need this drama when we're in the shit.
Yes, Obama was right to replace him.
No, it wasn't insubordination
More proof of the left's hypocrisy... Petraeus was an idiot when he worked for Bush but now Obama want's him back...WTF?
SNIP:
When Fallon Resigned, Dems Criticized Bush for Punishing Truth Tellers
By Philip Klein on 6.23.10 @ 4:49PM
Today's ouster of Gen. Stanley McChrystal was the just the latest in a line of conflicts between top military commanders and presidents. But what's interesting is that the ouster of McChrystal is being portrayed as the proper course of action to restore unity and reinforce civilian control of the military, but when Admiral William Fallon resigned as head of Central Command in 2008, it was covered as if the Bush administration couldn't handle disagreements, and Democrats went on the attack.
For instance, here's the Bloomberg account:
Admiral William Fallon's resignation as U.S. commander in the Middle East provoked criticism that President George W. Bush won't tolerate dissent and fed speculation his Iran policy could become more confrontational.
``Congress needs to determine immediately whether Admiral Fallon's resignation is another example of truth tellers being forced to the sidelines in the Bush administration,'' said Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who lost to Bush in the 2004 election. ``His departure must not clear the way for a rush to war with Iran.''...
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, a U.S. senator from New York, called Fallon a ``sensible voice'' that supported ``engaging Iran.'' She urged her colleagues to back a bill requiring Bush to get congressional approval before taking any military action against Iran.
read the rest here.
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : When Fallon Resigned, Dems Criticized Bush for Punishing Truth Tellers
You watch and wait....
Afghanistan doesn't go anywhere and Little Lord Obammyroy claims "I inherited this General".
Mark it down.
SNIP:
When Fallon Resigned, Dems Criticized Bush for Punishing Truth Tellers
By Philip Klein on 6.23.10 @ 4:49PM
Today's ouster of Gen. Stanley McChrystal was the just the latest in a line of conflicts between top military commanders and presidents. But what's interesting is that the ouster of McChrystal is being portrayed as the proper course of action to restore unity and reinforce civilian control of the military, but when Admiral William Fallon resigned as head of Central Command in 2008, it was covered as if the Bush administration couldn't handle disagreements, and Democrats went on the attack.
For instance, here's the Bloomberg account:
Admiral William Fallon's resignation as U.S. commander in the Middle East provoked criticism that President George W. Bush won't tolerate dissent and fed speculation his Iran policy could become more confrontational.
``Congress needs to determine immediately whether Admiral Fallon's resignation is another example of truth tellers being forced to the sidelines in the Bush administration,'' said Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who lost to Bush in the 2004 election. ``His departure must not clear the way for a rush to war with Iran.''...
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, a U.S. senator from New York, called Fallon a ``sensible voice'' that supported ``engaging Iran.'' She urged her colleagues to back a bill requiring Bush to get congressional approval before taking any military action against Iran.
read the rest here.
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : When Fallon Resigned, Dems Criticized Bush for Punishing Truth Tellers
If you had ever actually paid attention you would know there was a crystal pattern of Senior officials, both civilian and military, who "resigned" for not being in lockstep with neocon agendas.
SNIP:
When Fallon Resigned, Dems Criticized Bush for Punishing Truth Tellers
By Philip Klein on 6.23.10 @ 4:49PM
Today's ouster of Gen. Stanley McChrystal was the just the latest in a line of conflicts between top military commanders and presidents. But what's interesting is that the ouster of McChrystal is being portrayed as the proper course of action to restore unity and reinforce civilian control of the military, but when Admiral William Fallon resigned as head of Central Command in 2008, it was covered as if the Bush administration couldn't handle disagreements, and Democrats went on the attack.
For instance, here's the Bloomberg account:
Admiral William Fallon's resignation as U.S. commander in the Middle East provoked criticism that President George W. Bush won't tolerate dissent and fed speculation his Iran policy could become more confrontational.
``Congress needs to determine immediately whether Admiral Fallon's resignation is another example of truth tellers being forced to the sidelines in the Bush administration,'' said Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who lost to Bush in the 2004 election. ``His departure must not clear the way for a rush to war with Iran.''...
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, a U.S. senator from New York, called Fallon a ``sensible voice'' that supported ``engaging Iran.'' She urged her colleagues to back a bill requiring Bush to get congressional approval before taking any military action against Iran.
read the rest here.
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : When Fallon Resigned, Dems Criticized Bush for Punishing Truth Tellers
If you had ever actually paid attention you would know there was a crystal pattern of Senior officials, both civilian and military, who "resigned" for not being in lockstep with neocon agendas.
Sort of similar to Joe Lieberman and his "punishment" for not bowing down to the almighty candidate Obama?
SNIP:
When Fallon Resigned, Dems Criticized Bush for Punishing Truth Tellers
By Philip Klein on 6.23.10 @ 4:49PM
Today's ouster of Gen. Stanley McChrystal was the just the latest in a line of conflicts between top military commanders and presidents. But what's interesting is that the ouster of McChrystal is being portrayed as the proper course of action to restore unity and reinforce civilian control of the military, but when Admiral William Fallon resigned as head of Central Command in 2008, it was covered as if the Bush administration couldn't handle disagreements, and Democrats went on the attack.
For instance, here's the Bloomberg account:
Admiral William Fallon's resignation as U.S. commander in the Middle East provoked criticism that President George W. Bush won't tolerate dissent and fed speculation his Iran policy could become more confrontational.
``Congress needs to determine immediately whether Admiral Fallon's resignation is another example of truth tellers being forced to the sidelines in the Bush administration,'' said Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who lost to Bush in the 2004 election. ``His departure must not clear the way for a rush to war with Iran.''...
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, a U.S. senator from New York, called Fallon a ``sensible voice'' that supported ``engaging Iran.'' She urged her colleagues to back a bill requiring Bush to get congressional approval before taking any military action against Iran.
read the rest here.
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : When Fallon Resigned, Dems Criticized Bush for Punishing Truth Tellers
If you had ever actually paid attention you would know there was a crystal pattern of Senior officials, both civilian and military, who "resigned" for not being in lockstep with neocon agendas.
Sort of similar to Joe Lieberman and his "punishment" for not bowing down to the almighty candidate Obama?
If you had ever actually paid attention you would know there was a crystal pattern of Senior officials, both civilian and military, who "resigned" for not being in lockstep with neocon agendas.
Sort of similar to Joe Lieberman and his "punishment" for not bowing down to the almighty candidate Obama?
Please expound on that. If you can.
If you had ever actually paid attention you would know there was a crystal pattern of Senior officials, both civilian and military, who "resigned" for not being in lockstep with neocon agendas.
Sort of similar to Joe Lieberman and his "punishment" for not bowing down to the almighty candidate Obama?
The same Joe Lieberman who also didn't cast a vote condemning moveon.org for the Betrayus ad?
Sort of similar to Joe Lieberman and his "punishment" for not bowing down to the almighty candidate Obama?
The same Joe Lieberman who also didn't cast a vote condemning moveon.org for the Betrayus ad?
What does that have to do with anything?
I agreed that condemning a website becuase you dont agree with it was childiish and not American.
Joe Lieberman supported a candidate. THe majority leader got angry as it was not the candidate HE supported. So Reid acted like a child and said "play my way or I will take my ball and go home"
SNIP:
When Fallon Resigned, Dems Criticized Bush for Punishing Truth Tellers
By Philip Klein on 6.23.10 @ 4:49PM
Today's ouster of Gen. Stanley McChrystal was the just the latest in a line of conflicts between top military commanders and presidents. But what's interesting is that the ouster of McChrystal is being portrayed as the proper course of action to restore unity and reinforce civilian control of the military, but when Admiral William Fallon resigned as head of Central Command in 2008, it was covered as if the Bush administration couldn't handle disagreements, and Democrats went on the attack.
For instance, here's the Bloomberg account:
Admiral William Fallon's resignation as U.S. commander in the Middle East provoked criticism that President George W. Bush won't tolerate dissent and fed speculation his Iran policy could become more confrontational.
``Congress needs to determine immediately whether Admiral Fallon's resignation is another example of truth tellers being forced to the sidelines in the Bush administration,'' said Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who lost to Bush in the 2004 election. ``His departure must not clear the way for a rush to war with Iran.''...
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, a U.S. senator from New York, called Fallon a ``sensible voice'' that supported ``engaging Iran.'' She urged her colleagues to back a bill requiring Bush to get congressional approval before taking any military action against Iran.
read the rest here.
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : When Fallon Resigned, Dems Criticized Bush for Punishing Truth Tellers
If you had ever actually paid attention you would know there was a crystal pattern of Senior officials, both civilian and military, who "resigned" for not being in lockstep with neocon agendas.
Sort of similar to Joe Lieberman and his "punishment" for not bowing down to the almighty candidate Obama?
Sort of similar to Joe Lieberman and his "punishment" for not bowing down to the almighty candidate Obama?
Please expound on that. If you can.
He supported McCain and was reprimanded by Reid. Stripped of his chairmanship of a senate commitee and threatened to be eliminated from the democratic caucus.
And all becuase he believed that one candidate for POTUS was a better choice than another.
IN essecne, all becuase he refused to follow the leadership of a party.