Every time you post asking about the militia in relation to owner ship you question the ruling dumb ass.If Iām continuoisly insisting that the Supreme Court was wrong then it should be easy for you to post a quote where I said that. Letās see it.Your continued INSISTENCE that a Militia has anything to do with our rights under the 2nd Amendment.Please post my comment that made you think I was challenging the Supreme Courts decision. Iāll wait.Look you fruit cake the Supreme Court ruled that the part before the comma has ZERO bearing on the right, that it is an individual right with NO, NADA, ZERO need for a militia. You love roe vs wade but cant seem to accept decisions you don't like how very progressive of you.The Militia is a part of the second amendment, in fact, it is the first thing mentioned so donāt pretend that it is insignificant. Youāve made your point clear as to how much relevance you give it. Thatās fine, now move one. I donāt get why you keep bringing it upThe second amendment conveys a right to own firearms with ZERO requirement of belonging to a militia. The militia in this discussion as I have pointed out repeatedly is irrelevant, it has no basis in fact for a discussion on 2nd amendment rights.