Perfect example for 2nd amendment rights.

[Theowl32]

Unlike the rich elitist left wing commies protected by armed guards and behind walls, the middle class who dont have such luxuries, perfect example.

Gentleman breaking into the persons home with a machete with the intention of killing the man and his wife.

Fucking left wingers are losers. Esepcially the rich hypocritical white ones.

 

[aaronleland]

I was reading a comment below the video.

"Good thing he locked the door made of Kleenex."

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Unlike the rich elitist left wing commies protected by armed guards and behind walls, the middle class who dont have such luxuries, perfect example.

Gentleman breaking into the persons home with a machete with the intention of killing the man and his wife.

Fucking left wingers are losers. Esepcially the rich hypocritical white ones.

Must of been a 9mm. I use the 45 auto, only have to shoot the liberal once.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Obviously not a head shot. Yeesh.

 

[g5000]

Unlike the rich elitist left wing commies protected by armed guards and behind walls, the middle class who dont have such luxuries, perfect example.

Gentleman breaking into the persons home with a machete with the intention of killing the man and his wife.

Fucking left wingers are losers. Esepcially the rich hypocritical white ones.

What is your proposal for mitigating the 11,000+ gun homicides in the US each year?

 

[Slade3200]

Unlike the rich elitist left wing commies protected by armed guards and behind walls, the middle class who dont have such luxuries, perfect example.

Gentleman breaking into the persons home with a machete with the intention of killing the man and his wife.

Fucking left wingers are losers. Esepcially the rich hypocritical white ones.

What are you talking about? Next time try a little harder to make your point, you got to caught up in trying to insult the Left to actually clearly communicate what the fuck you were wanting to say.

 

[depotoo]

Did you see this news report of another man wielding a machete and broke into 2 apartments? They had no weapons and felt helpless as to what to do if he had attacked them with it. Fortunately, he didn’t, but what if he had? They were defenseless.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Leftists would prosecute the guy with the gun, because...guns are bad, mmmkay.

 

[Slade3200]

Did you see this news report of another man wielding a machete and broke into 2 apartments? They had no weapons and felt helpless as to what to do if he had attacked them with it. Fortunately, he didn’t, but what if he had? They were defenseless.

Who is saying that law abiding families shouldn’t have the right to own a gun to protect their families in their home? Please show who is saying that or stop dishonestly implying that is the sentiment of the “left”

 

[Marion Morrison]

Did you see this news report of another man wielding a machete and broke into 2 apartments? They had no weapons and felt helpless as to what to do if he had attacked them with it. Fortunately, he didn’t, but what if he had? They were defenseless.

The brother in law probably scared the guy to death!

 

[depotoo]

Well, let’s see. There was only a hand gun ban in DC for 32 years that did just that....

Did you see this news report of another man wielding a machete and broke into 2 apartments? They had no weapons and felt helpless as to what to do if he had attacked them with it. Fortunately, he didn’t, but what if he had? They were defenseless.

Who is saying that law abiding families shouldn’t have the right to own a gun to protect their families in their home? Please show who is saying that or stop dishonestly implying that is the sentiment of the “left”

 

[Pop23]

Unlike the rich elitist left wing commies protected by armed guards and behind walls, the middle class who dont have such luxuries, perfect example.

Gentleman breaking into the persons home with a machete with the intention of killing the man and his wife.

Fucking left wingers are losers. Esepcially the rich hypocritical white ones.

What is your proposal for mitigating the 11,000+ gun homicides in the US each year?

You do realize the perp didn't have a gun, Right?

Murderers Murder, It's what they do, they really don't care what tools are available, they go about their business regardless.

their plan to mitigate machete homicides is to prepare themselves and kill him before he can kill his family.

Or are you a complete idiot?

 

[depotoo]

You get the Supreme Court filled with just over a majority progressives/Dems, what could happen...

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

What is your proposal for mitigating the 11,000+ gun homicides in the US each year?

What's yours that doesn't involve punishing 99.9999999% of gun owners who are not dangerous?

 

[Theowl32]

Unlike the rich elitist left wing commies protected by armed guards and behind walls, the middle class who dont have such luxuries, perfect example.

Gentleman breaking into the persons home with a machete with the intention of killing the man and his wife.

Fucking left wingers are losers. Esepcially the rich hypocritical white ones.

What are you talking about? Next time try a little harder to make your point, you got to caught up in trying to insult the Left to actually clearly communicate what the fuck you were wanting to say.

Holy shit you are all pathetic retarded ignorant illiterate losers.

 

[Slade3200]

Well, let’s see. There was only a hand gun ban in DC for 32 years that did just that....

Did you see this news report of another man wielding a machete and broke into 2 apartments? They had no weapons and felt helpless as to what to do if he had attacked them with it. Fortunately, he didn’t, but what if he had? They were defenseless.

Who is saying that law abiding families shouldn’t have the right to own a gun to protect their families in their home? Please show who is saying that or stop dishonestly implying that is the sentiment of the “left”

Good point. It was an overreach by DC and rightfully remedied by the Supreme Court

 

[Slade3200]

Unlike the rich elitist left wing commies protected by armed guards and behind walls, the middle class who dont have such luxuries, perfect example.

Gentleman breaking into the persons home with a machete with the intention of killing the man and his wife.

Fucking left wingers are losers. Esepcially the rich hypocritical white ones.

What are you talking about? Next time try a little harder to make your point, you got to caught up in trying to insult the Left to actually clearly communicate what the fuck you were wanting to say.

Holy shit you are all pathetic retarded ignorant illiterate losers.

Wow, great response. Your intellect shines through your inability to make a rational point. Keep it up!

 

[g5000]

What is your proposal for mitigating the 11,000+ gun homicides in the US each year?

What's yours that doesn't involve punishing 99.9999999% of gun owners who are not dangerous?

I'm pro-gun. I've offered a proposal many times.

I am curious to know if the topic starter has anything other than rabies foam in his head.

 

[depotoo]

Remember this-

On Sept. 24, 1976, one of the toughest gun laws in the nation took effect in the District of Columbia, essentially outlawing the private ownership of new handguns in a city struggling with violence.

Over the next few weeks, a man with a .32-caliber pistol held up workers at a downtown federal office at midday, a cab driver was shot in the head, and a senator was mugged by three youths, one carrying a revolver, near the U.S. Capitol.

Since the ban was passed, more than 8,400 people have been murdered in the district, many killed by handguns. Nearly 80 percent of the 181 murders in 2007 were committed with guns.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in a challenge to the city's handgun ban. The case is likely to produce the most important firearms ruling in generations and could undermine other gun control laws nationwide if the court takes an expansive view of the right to bear arms.
Has DC's Handgun Ban Prevented Bloodshed?

 

[depotoo]

June 1976: Eighteen months after Congress established home rule for the District, the D.C. Council votes 12 to 1 in favor of a bill restricting city residents from acquiring handguns. The law exempts guards, police officers and owners who had registered their handguns before it took effect. Under the bill, all firearms (including rifles and shotguns, which were not restricted by the law) must be kept unloaded and disassembled, except those in business establishments.

September 1976: Attempts in Congress to block the District law fail, clearing the way for it to go into effect.

July 1977: The D.C. Council exempts private security firms from the gun bill and removes a requirement that gun owners take vision and gun law tests.

June 1999: A House bill carrying an amendment that would have allowed "law-abiding citizens" to own and carry guns in the District is defeated.

February 2003: Six D.C. residents sue the city, in a case known as Parker v. the District of Columbia, arguing that the gun law illegally prevents them from keeping guns in their homes.

April 2003: Five other D.C. residents, including longtime activist Sandra Seegars, file a separate suit, Seegars v. Ashcroft, against the federal and city governments, saying they have a right to bear arms.

July 2003: Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) introduces a measure to end the District's ban on carrying handguns and keeping them in the home. The legislation would also ease registration requirements for firearms and ammunition. It later dies in committee.

January 2004: U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton dismisses the Seegars suit.

March 2004: U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan dismisses the Parker suit.

September 2004: The House votes 250 to 171 to roll back most of the District's gun laws, but the Senate fails to take up the measure before Congress recesses.

February 2005: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upholds the ruling against Seegars, finding that she and other plaintiffs lacked legal standing.

June 30, 2005: House votes to repeal District's gun restrictions.

November 2005: Congress approves the District's 2006 budget, leaving out a provision that would have prevented the city from enforcing the requirement that guns in homes be kept unloaded and disassembled. The House for the second year in a row votes overwhelmingly in favor of the restriction, but the language is removed in conference before the final passage.

March 2007: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit overturns U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan's decision in the Parker case, finding that one of the plaintiffs has legal standing because he applied for and was denied a registration certificate to own a handgun. The court finds that the D.C. law illegally bars guns in homes. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty (D) says the city will appeal.

May 2007: A federal appeals court in Washington let stand a ruling that struck down a restrictive D.C. ban on gun ownership, setting the stage for a potentially major constitutional battle over the Second Amendment in the Supreme Court.

September 2007: The District asks the Supreme Court to uphold its strict 30-year handgun ban. The high court has not ruled on the Second Amendment protection of the right to keep and bear arms since 1939.

November 2007: The Supreme Court agrees to rule on D.C. gun ban.

January 2008: Acting D.C. Attorney General Peter Nickles selects former acting U.S. solicitor general Walter E. Dellinger to defend the District's handgun ban.

February 2008: Senate, House members file a amicus brief urging the Supreme Court uphold the ruling that the District's handgun ban violates the Second Amendment.

March 2008: Supreme Court hears arguments.

June 26, 2008: Supreme Court strikes down the D.C. ban on handguns.

July, 2008: The D.C. Council passes revised gun laws that require registration, background checks and more. The city is sued again weeks later on the basis that its new rules are too onerous.

A History of D.C. Gun Ban