Pelosi vows to join The Jihad to Defend Iran.

[JLW]

Speaker Pelosi owns Lil’ Don. She has consistently outsmarted him. Donny has conniptions because he can’t control or bully her. The Speaker continues to stand up for the Constitution while Trump runs roughshod over it. Godspeed Madam Pelosi.

There is Trump's side, and there is Iran's side. You are on Iran's side.

I always suspected Trumpers were nothing but Bushies at heart. You’re a little Bushie for sure. Thanks for proving that. You just quoted W. that you are either with us or against us in the lead up to the 2003 Iraqi invasion. We all know how that turned out. Not only is that pure W.,it is also anti-American. Beyond that whenever someone says something like that, it screams “lemming”. My advice to you: stop being a lemming and get some independence of thought.

This is just a few snips from the Wiki Page detailing Iran's involvement in state sponsored terrorism.

Iran and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia

Iran has engaged in training, financing, and providing weapons and safe havens for non-state militant actors, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and other Palestinian groups (Islamic Jihad (PIJ) and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command (PFLP-GC)). These groups are designated terrorist groups by a number of countries and international bodies; however, Iran considers such groups to be "national liberation movements" with a right to self-defense in the face of Israeli military occupation.[1] The United States State Department has also accused Iranian-backed Iraqi Shia militias of terrorism against US troops, and Iran of cyberterrorism, primarily through its Quds Force.

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)

After the fall of the Shah in 1979, the Islamic Republic of Iran established the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to domestically promote the government's social policy. IRGC is accused of spreading its ideology in neighboring regions by training and funding "terrorist organizations". By 1986, IRGC had 350,000 members and had acquired a small naval and air force. By 1996, its ground forces numbered 100,000 and the naval forces numbered 20,000. They are believed to use the Quds Force to train Islamic militants.[3]

In 1995, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard held a conference with worldwide organizations accused of engaging in terrorism including the Japanese Red Army, the Armenian Secret Army, the Kurdistan Workers' Party, the Iraqi Da'wah Party, the Islamic Front for the Liberation of Bahrain and Hezbollah in Beirut for the sole purpose of providing training to these organizations supposedly to help in the destabilization of Gulf States and aid assistance to militants in these countries to replace the existing governments with Iran-like regimes.[4]

The United States State Department states that IRGC provides support for Hamas, Hezbollah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Israel. They also say that IRGC has given much support and training to terrorists supporting the Palestinian resistance. They are also accused of aiding the Iraqi insurgency in southern Iraq.[4]

Shi'ite Militias in Iraq

Iranian proxies killed an estimated 1,100 US troops in Iraq.[42] In addition, insurgents supported by Iran reportedly committed acts of terrorism.[35][43][44] The United States State Department states that weapons are smuggled into Iraq and used to arm Iran's allies among the Shiite militias, including those of the anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi army.[45]

During his address to the United States Congress on September 11, 2007, Commanding Officer for the United States forces in Iraq, General David Petraeus noted that the multinational forces in Iraq found that Iran's Quds force had provided training, equipment, funding, and direction to Shi'ite militia groups. “When we captured the leaders of these so-called special groups … and the deputy commander of a Lebanese Hezbollah department that was created to support their efforts in Iraq, we’ve learned a great deal about how Iran has, in fact, supported these elements and how those elements have carried out violent acts against our forces, Iraqi forces and innocent civilians.”[43]

In 2015, Michael Weiss and Michael Pregent accused the Popular Mobilization Units, an organization of 40 mainly-Shi'ite militias backed by Iran, of committing extensive atrocities against Sunni civilians in the course of their war against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, including "burning people alive in their houses, playing soccer with severed human heads, and ethnically cleansing and razing whole villages to the ground." Weiss and Pregent even suggested that "Iran's Shi'ite militias aren't a whole lot better than the Islamic State."[46]

Al-Qaeda ties

Al-Qaeda leaders regard Shia Muslims as heretics and have attacked their mosques and gatherings.[54] In Iraq it considers Shi'i civilians to be legitimate targets for acts of violence.[55] The group has been designated as a terrorist organization by Iran and many other countries, and Iran has a hostile relationship with the group.[56] However, allegedly Al-Qaeda and Iran formed an alliance during the 1990s in which Hezbollah trained al Qaeda operatives.[57] Iran detained hundreds of al Qaeda operatives that entered the country following the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan; even though "the Iranian government has held most of them under house arrest, limited their freedom of movement, and closely monitored their activities," U.S. officials have expressed concerns that Iran has not fully accounted for their whereabouts, culminating in accusations of Iranian complicity in the 2003 Riyadh compound bombings.[56][58]

1998 United States embassy bombings

On November 8, 2011, Judge John D. Bates ruled in federal court that Iran was liable for the 1998 United States embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. In his 45-page decision, Judge Bates wrote that "Prior to their meetings with Iranian officials and agents Bin Laden and al Qaeda did not possess the technical expertise required to carry out the embassy bombings in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam."[59]

USS Cole bombing

In March 2015, U.S. federal judge Rudolph Contreras found both Iran and Sudan complicit in the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole by al Qaeda, stating that "Iran was directly involved in establishing Al-Qaeda's Yemen network and supported training and logistics for Al-Qaeda in the Gulf region" through Hezbollah. Two previous federal judges had ruled that Sudan was liable for its role in the attack, but Contreras's "ruling is the first to find Iran partly responsible for the incident."[60]

September 11

Main article: Responsibility for the September 11 attacks

The U.S. indictment of bin Laden filed in 1998 stated that al-Qaeda "forged alliances ... with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezbollah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies."[57] On May 31, 2001, Steven Emerson and Daniel Pipes wrote in The Wall Street Journal that "Officials of the Iranian government helped arrange advanced weapons and explosives training for Al-Qaeda personnel in Lebanon where they learned, for example, how to destroy large buildings."[61]

The 9/11 Commission Report stated that 8 to 10 of the hijackers on 9/11 previously passed through Iran and their travel was facilitated by Iranian border guards.[57][62] The report also found "circumstantial evidence that senior Hezbollah operatives were closely tracking the travel of some of these future muscle hijackers into Iran in November 2000."[62] After the commission called for "further investigation" into a possible Iranian role in the attacks, President George W. Bush demanded that Iran sever its ties with al-Qaeda, while saying that in his view, "There was no direct connection between Iran and the attacks of September 11."[63]

Two defectors from Iran's intelligence service testified that Iranian officials had "foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks."[64] By contrast, the 9/11 Commission "found no evidence that Iran or Hezbollah was aware of the planning for what later became the 9/11 attack. At the time of their travel through Iran, the al Qaeda operatives themselves were probably not aware of the specific details of their future operation." In addition, both bin al-Shibh and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed denied "any relationship between the hijackers and Hezbollah" and "any other reason for the hijackers' travel to Iran" besides "taking advantage of the Iranian practice of not stamping Saudi passports."[62]

Riyadh compound bombings
According to Seth G. Jones and Peter Bergen, the 2003 Riyadh compound bombings were planned by al Qaeda operatives in Iran, with apparent Iranian complicity.[58][65] In May 2003, then-State Department official Ryan Crocker provided information on the upcoming attack to Iranian officials, who apparently took no action.[35]

Iran and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia

Your thread was about Pelosi and keeping a President from getting us into war no one wants but the POTUS. Your post may be accurate, but that has nothing to do with Pelosi's resolution.

If you think we should just Declare War on Iran today, just say so. What is your position? Should we declare war?

 

[jc456]

Speaker Pelosi owns Lil’ Don. She has consistently outsmarted him. Donny has conniptions because he can’t control or bully her. The Speaker continues to stand up for the Constitution while Trump runs roughshod over it. Godspeed Madam Pelosi.

There is Trump's side, and there is Iran's side. You are on Iran's side.

I always suspected Trumpers were nothing but Bushies at heart. You’re a little Bushie for sure. Thanks for proving that. You just quoted W. that you are either with us or against us in the lead up to the 2003 Iraqi invasion. We all know how that turned out. Not only is that pure W.,it is also anti-American. Beyond that whenever someone says something like that, it screams “lemming”. My advice to you: stop being a lemming and get some independence of thought.

This is just a few snips from the Wiki Page detailing Iran's involvement in state sponsored terrorism.

Iran and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia

Iran has engaged in training, financing, and providing weapons and safe havens for non-state militant actors, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and other Palestinian groups (Islamic Jihad (PIJ) and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command (PFLP-GC)). These groups are designated terrorist groups by a number of countries and international bodies; however, Iran considers such groups to be "national liberation movements" with a right to self-defense in the face of Israeli military occupation.[1] The United States State Department has also accused Iranian-backed Iraqi Shia militias of terrorism against US troops, and Iran of cyberterrorism, primarily through its Quds Force.

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)

After the fall of the Shah in 1979, the Islamic Republic of Iran established the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to domestically promote the government's social policy. IRGC is accused of spreading its ideology in neighboring regions by training and funding "terrorist organizations". By 1986, IRGC had 350,000 members and had acquired a small naval and air force. By 1996, its ground forces numbered 100,000 and the naval forces numbered 20,000. They are believed to use the Quds Force to train Islamic militants.[3]

In 1995, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard held a conference with worldwide organizations accused of engaging in terrorism including the Japanese Red Army, the Armenian Secret Army, the Kurdistan Workers' Party, the Iraqi Da'wah Party, the Islamic Front for the Liberation of Bahrain and Hezbollah in Beirut for the sole purpose of providing training to these organizations supposedly to help in the destabilization of Gulf States and aid assistance to militants in these countries to replace the existing governments with Iran-like regimes.[4]

The United States State Department states that IRGC provides support for Hamas, Hezbollah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Israel. They also say that IRGC has given much support and training to terrorists supporting the Palestinian resistance. They are also accused of aiding the Iraqi insurgency in southern Iraq.[4]

Shi'ite Militias in Iraq

Iranian proxies killed an estimated 1,100 US troops in Iraq.[42] In addition, insurgents supported by Iran reportedly committed acts of terrorism.[35][43][44] The United States State Department states that weapons are smuggled into Iraq and used to arm Iran's allies among the Shiite militias, including those of the anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi army.[45]

During his address to the United States Congress on September 11, 2007, Commanding Officer for the United States forces in Iraq, General David Petraeus noted that the multinational forces in Iraq found that Iran's Quds force had provided training, equipment, funding, and direction to Shi'ite militia groups. “When we captured the leaders of these so-called special groups … and the deputy commander of a Lebanese Hezbollah department that was created to support their efforts in Iraq, we’ve learned a great deal about how Iran has, in fact, supported these elements and how those elements have carried out violent acts against our forces, Iraqi forces and innocent civilians.”[43]

In 2015, Michael Weiss and Michael Pregent accused the Popular Mobilization Units, an organization of 40 mainly-Shi'ite militias backed by Iran, of committing extensive atrocities against Sunni civilians in the course of their war against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, including "burning people alive in their houses, playing soccer with severed human heads, and ethnically cleansing and razing whole villages to the ground." Weiss and Pregent even suggested that "Iran's Shi'ite militias aren't a whole lot better than the Islamic State."[46]

Al-Qaeda ties

Al-Qaeda leaders regard Shia Muslims as heretics and have attacked their mosques and gatherings.[54] In Iraq it considers Shi'i civilians to be legitimate targets for acts of violence.[55] The group has been designated as a terrorist organization by Iran and many other countries, and Iran has a hostile relationship with the group.[56] However, allegedly Al-Qaeda and Iran formed an alliance during the 1990s in which Hezbollah trained al Qaeda operatives.[57] Iran detained hundreds of al Qaeda operatives that entered the country following the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan; even though "the Iranian government has held most of them under house arrest, limited their freedom of movement, and closely monitored their activities," U.S. officials have expressed concerns that Iran has not fully accounted for their whereabouts, culminating in accusations of Iranian complicity in the 2003 Riyadh compound bombings.[56][58]

1998 United States embassy bombings

On November 8, 2011, Judge John D. Bates ruled in federal court that Iran was liable for the 1998 United States embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. In his 45-page decision, Judge Bates wrote that "Prior to their meetings with Iranian officials and agents Bin Laden and al Qaeda did not possess the technical expertise required to carry out the embassy bombings in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam."[59]

USS Cole bombing

In March 2015, U.S. federal judge Rudolph Contreras found both Iran and Sudan complicit in the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole by al Qaeda, stating that "Iran was directly involved in establishing Al-Qaeda's Yemen network and supported training and logistics for Al-Qaeda in the Gulf region" through Hezbollah. Two previous federal judges had ruled that Sudan was liable for its role in the attack, but Contreras's "ruling is the first to find Iran partly responsible for the incident."[60]

September 11

Main article: Responsibility for the September 11 attacks

The U.S. indictment of bin Laden filed in 1998 stated that al-Qaeda "forged alliances ... with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezbollah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies."[57] On May 31, 2001, Steven Emerson and Daniel Pipes wrote in The Wall Street Journal that "Officials of the Iranian government helped arrange advanced weapons and explosives training for Al-Qaeda personnel in Lebanon where they learned, for example, how to destroy large buildings."[61]

The 9/11 Commission Report stated that 8 to 10 of the hijackers on 9/11 previously passed through Iran and their travel was facilitated by Iranian border guards.[57][62] The report also found "circumstantial evidence that senior Hezbollah operatives were closely tracking the travel of some of these future muscle hijackers into Iran in November 2000."[62] After the commission called for "further investigation" into a possible Iranian role in the attacks, President George W. Bush demanded that Iran sever its ties with al-Qaeda, while saying that in his view, "There was no direct connection between Iran and the attacks of September 11."[63]

Two defectors from Iran's intelligence service testified that Iranian officials had "foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks."[64] By contrast, the 9/11 Commission "found no evidence that Iran or Hezbollah was aware of the planning for what later became the 9/11 attack. At the time of their travel through Iran, the al Qaeda operatives themselves were probably not aware of the specific details of their future operation." In addition, both bin al-Shibh and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed denied "any relationship between the hijackers and Hezbollah" and "any other reason for the hijackers' travel to Iran" besides "taking advantage of the Iranian practice of not stamping Saudi passports."[62]

Riyadh compound bombings
According to Seth G. Jones and Peter Bergen, the 2003 Riyadh compound bombings were planned by al Qaeda operatives in Iran, with apparent Iranian complicity.[58][65] In May 2003, then-State Department official Ryan Crocker provided information on the upcoming attack to Iranian officials, who apparently took no action.[35]

Iran and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia

Your thread was about Pelosi and keeping a President from getting us into war no one wants but the POTUS. Your post may be accurate, but that has nothing to do with Pelosi's resolution.

If you think we should just Declare War on Iran today, just say so. What is your position? Should we declare war?

where is there any evidence to your claim? post a link. Step out and be honest for once, be a fking human being that is an american. post it.

 

[JLW]

Speaker Pelosi owns Lil’ Don. She has consistently outsmarted him. Donny has conniptions because he can’t control or bully her. The Speaker continues to stand up for the Constitution while Trump runs roughshod over it. Godspeed Madam Pelosi.

Iran Nan is doing all she can to help Trump reduce the Stalinist democrats to a national political rounding error over the next few elections

I find that the same people who supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq, now support war with Iran. That is fine if that is what you believe, but at least have the honesty to say, Congress must approve the declaration of war as per the constitution of the USA..

 

[jc456]

Speaker Pelosi owns Lil’ Don. She has consistently outsmarted him. Donny has conniptions because he can’t control or bully her. The Speaker continues to stand up for the Constitution while Trump runs roughshod over it. Godspeed Madam Pelosi.

Iran Nan is doing all she can to help Trump reduce the Stalinist democrats to a national political rounding error over the next few elections

I find that the same people who supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq, now support war with Iran. That is fine if that is what you believe, but at least have the honesty to say, Congress must approve the declaration of war.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Speaker Pelosi owns Lil’ Don. She has consistently outsmarted him. Donny has conniptions because he can’t control or bully her. The Speaker continues to stand up for the Constitution while Trump runs roughshod over it. Godspeed Madam Pelosi.

Iran Nan is doing all she can to help Trump reduce the Stalinist democrats to a national political rounding error over the next few elections

I find that the same people who supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq, now support war with Iran. That is fine if that is what you believe, but at least have the honesty to say, Congress must approve the declaration of war.

When did Trump say he wants a War with Iran? That's more Fake news

 

[The Original Tree]

Iran is a peace loving country, and is not an Existential Threat to America like President Trump is, she said.

Trump is an Imminent Threat to our Republic, and a Danger to our Constitution.

Islam "the religion of peace" is not a threat to our National Security, but The President is.

So today, in that same vein, Nancy Pelosi will again attempt to Abuse the Power of Congress and try to appropriate Power The Constitution has given The Executive Branch for herself in her effort to defend Iran, and attack America.

Pelosi effort to rein in Trump on Iran renews war powers debate

Pelosi said that a classified War Powers Act notification delivered to Congress last week "raises more questions than it answers" and prompted "serious and urgent questions about the timing, manner and justification of the Administration's decision to engage in hostilities against Iran – complaining that Congress and the American people "are being left in the dark about our national security."

"The Trump Administration's provocative, escalatory and disproportionate military engagement continues to put servicemembers, diplomats and citizens of America and our allies in danger," Pelosi, D-Calif., stated. "This initiation of hostilities was taken without an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iran, without the consultation of the Congress and without the articulation of a clear and legitimate strategy to either the Congress or the public."

Iran Nan is setting herself up for the biggest SOTU embarrassment ever

I'm pretty confident this is coming. And I personally think the real reason Pelosi is holding up the articles is because she does not want to be bitch slapped in The SOTU for conducting a SHAM Impeachment Inquiry, because The Senate even The Dems are pissed now for her not delivering The Articles and The President is going to be exonerated completely.

She miscalculated.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Iran is a peace loving country, and is not an Existential Threat to America like President Trump is, she said.

Trump is an Imminent Threat to our Republic, and a Danger to our Constitution.

Islam "the religion of peace" is not a threat to our National Security, but The President is.

So today, in that same vein, Nancy Pelosi will again attempt to Abuse the Power of Congress and try to appropriate Power The Constitution has given The Executive Branch for herself in her effort to defend Iran, and attack America.

Pelosi effort to rein in Trump on Iran renews war powers debate

Pelosi said that a classified War Powers Act notification delivered to Congress last week "raises more questions than it answers" and prompted "serious and urgent questions about the timing, manner and justification of the Administration's decision to engage in hostilities against Iran – complaining that Congress and the American people "are being left in the dark about our national security."

"The Trump Administration's provocative, escalatory and disproportionate military engagement continues to put servicemembers, diplomats and citizens of America and our allies in danger," Pelosi, D-Calif., stated. "This initiation of hostilities was taken without an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iran, without the consultation of the Congress and without the articulation of a clear and legitimate strategy to either the Congress or the public."

Iran Nan is setting herself up for the biggest SOTU embarrassment ever

I'm pretty confident this is coming. And I personally think the real reason Pelosi is holding up the articles is because she does not want to be bitch slapped in The SOTU for conducting a SHAM Impeachment Inquiry, because The Senate even The Dems are pissed now for her not delivering The Articles.

She might drop them the morning of the SOTU

 

[The Original Tree]

Speaker Pelosi owns Lil’ Don. She has consistently outsmarted him. Donny has conniptions because he can’t control or bully her. The Speaker continues to stand up for the Constitution while Trump runs roughshod over it. Godspeed Madam Pelosi.

Iran Nan is doing all she can to help Trump reduce the Stalinist democrats to a national political rounding error over the next few elections

I find that the same people who supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq, now support war with Iran. That is fine if that is what you believe, but at least have the honesty to say, Congress must approve the declaration of war as per the constitution of the USA..

Didn't Iraq invade Kuwait?

 

[The Original Tree]

People will see right through that, like they saw through her doing the USMCA on the day she did the articles with a smirk on her face.

Iran is a peace loving country, and is not an Existential Threat to America like President Trump is, she said.

Trump is an Imminent Threat to our Republic, and a Danger to our Constitution.

Islam "the religion of peace" is not a threat to our National Security, but The President is.

So today, in that same vein, Nancy Pelosi will again attempt to Abuse the Power of Congress and try to appropriate Power The Constitution has given The Executive Branch for herself in her effort to defend Iran, and attack America.

Pelosi effort to rein in Trump on Iran renews war powers debate

Pelosi said that a classified War Powers Act notification delivered to Congress last week "raises more questions than it answers" and prompted "serious and urgent questions about the timing, manner and justification of the Administration's decision to engage in hostilities against Iran – complaining that Congress and the American people "are being left in the dark about our national security."

"The Trump Administration's provocative, escalatory and disproportionate military engagement continues to put servicemembers, diplomats and citizens of America and our allies in danger," Pelosi, D-Calif., stated. "This initiation of hostilities was taken without an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iran, without the consultation of the Congress and without the articulation of a clear and legitimate strategy to either the Congress or the public."

Iran Nan is setting herself up for the biggest SOTU embarrassment ever

I'm pretty confident this is coming. And I personally think the real reason Pelosi is holding up the articles is because she does not want to be bitch slapped in The SOTU for conducting a SHAM Impeachment Inquiry, because The Senate even The Dems are pissed now for her not delivering The Articles.

She might drop them the morning of the SOTU

 

[22lcidw]

Speaker Pelosi owns Lil’ Don. She has consistently outsmarted him. Donny has conniptions because he can’t control or bully her. The Speaker continues to stand up for the Constitution while Trump runs roughshod over it. Godspeed Madam Pelosi.

There is Trump's side, and there is Iran's side. You are on Iran's side.

I always suspected Trumpers were nothing but Bushies at heart. You’re a little Bushie for sure. Thanks for proving that. You just quoted W. that you are either with us or against us in the lead up to the 2003 Iraqi invasion. We all know how that turned out. Not only is that pure W.,it is also anti-American. Beyond that whenever someone says something like that, it screams “lemming”. My advice to you: stop being a lemming and get some independence of thought.

Do you see 100 thousand troops on the ground with hundreds of billions of dollars of equipment? I sure would like to see some blue cities vaporized. A beautiful sight I tell you. You care nothing of the troops. Frankly after all the wars I got tired of the military also for awhile. But we slowed down. And this with family in it. When you ph uks cut the budget you cut the military while paying people off at home for being irresponsible in their lives. What happens is that the equipment is worn and a lot of soldiers die practicing and training. You do not even take the time to redirect the reduced funds in your bravado of cutting some money. Trump was elected because of W. Bush. Because of Obama. Because of Clinton. Because of Bush the first.

 

[BlindBoo]

I sure would like to see some blue cities vaporized.

The true Trumpybear vision comes through. Trumpublicans want former Republicans to go to war with Democrats. No lie is stupid enough not to parrot as this thread shows.

Good job Comrades.

Putin Smiles.

 

[EvMetro]

Speaker Pelosi owns Lil’ Don. She has consistently outsmarted him. Donny has conniptions because he can’t control or bully her. The Speaker continues to stand up for the Constitution while Trump runs roughshod over it. Godspeed Madam Pelosi.

Iran Nan is doing all she can to help Trump reduce the Stalinist democrats to a national political rounding error over the next few elections

I find that the same people who supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq, now support war with Iran. That is fine if that is what you believe, but at least have the honesty to say, Congress must approve the declaration of war as per the constitution of the USA..

Why do you love iran so much? Are you from iran?

 

[The Original Tree]

Iran and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia

 

[jc456]

Iran is a peace loving country, and is not an Existential Threat to America like President Trump is, she said.

Trump is an Imminent Threat to our Republic, and a Danger to our Constitution.

Islam "the religion of peace" is not a threat to our National Security, but The President is.

So today, in that same vein, Nancy Pelosi will again attempt to Abuse the Power of Congress and try to appropriate Power The Constitution has given The Executive Branch for herself in her effort to defend Iran, and attack America.

Pelosi effort to rein in Trump on Iran renews war powers debate

Pelosi said that a classified War Powers Act notification delivered to Congress last week "raises more questions than it answers" and prompted "serious and urgent questions about the timing, manner and justification of the Administration's decision to engage in hostilities against Iran – complaining that Congress and the American people "are being left in the dark about our national security."

"The Trump Administration's provocative, escalatory and disproportionate military engagement continues to put servicemembers, diplomats and citizens of America and our allies in danger," Pelosi, D-Calif., stated. "This initiation of hostilities was taken without an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iran, without the consultation of the Congress and without the articulation of a clear and legitimate strategy to either the Congress or the public."

Iran Nan is setting herself up for the biggest SOTU embarrassment ever

I'm pretty confident this is coming. And I personally think the real reason Pelosi is holding up the articles is because she does not want to be bitch slapped in The SOTU for conducting a SHAM Impeachment Inquiry, because The Senate even The Dems are pissed now for her not delivering The Articles.

She might drop them the morning of the SOTU

I've been consistent with those articles, they will never reach the senate floor. EVAH!

 

[The Original Tree]

Iran is a peace loving country, and is not an Existential Threat to America like President Trump is, she said.

Trump is an Imminent Threat to our Republic, and a Danger to our Constitution.

Islam "the religion of peace" is not a threat to our National Security, but The President is.

So today, in that same vein, Nancy Pelosi will again attempt to Abuse the Power of Congress and try to appropriate Power The Constitution has given The Executive Branch for herself in her effort to defend Iran, and attack America.

Pelosi effort to rein in Trump on Iran renews war powers debate

Pelosi said that a classified War Powers Act notification delivered to Congress last week "raises more questions than it answers" and prompted "serious and urgent questions about the timing, manner and justification of the Administration's decision to engage in hostilities against Iran – complaining that Congress and the American people "are being left in the dark about our national security."

"The Trump Administration's provocative, escalatory and disproportionate military engagement continues to put servicemembers, diplomats and citizens of America and our allies in danger," Pelosi, D-Calif., stated. "This initiation of hostilities was taken without an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iran, without the consultation of the Congress and without the articulation of a clear and legitimate strategy to either the Congress or the public."

Iran Nan is setting herself up for the biggest SOTU embarrassment ever

I'm pretty confident this is coming. And I personally think the real reason Pelosi is holding up the articles is because she does not want to be bitch slapped in The SOTU for conducting a SHAM Impeachment Inquiry, because The Senate even The Dems are pissed now for her not delivering The Articles.

She might drop them the morning of the SOTU

I've been consistent with those articles, they will never reach the senate floor. EVAH!

The would be shocking, but it would not actually surprise me.

 

[jc456]

I sure would like to see some blue cities vaporized.

The true Trumpybear vision comes through. Trumpublicans want former Republicans to go to war with Democrats. No lie is stupid enough not to parrot as this thread shows.

Good job Comrades.

Putin Smiles.

no different than our congessman Swolwell. right? Accept he wanted all gun owners vaporized.

Just curious, did you post this same statement after that tweet? Or are you inconsistent and dishonest always?

 

[jc456]

Iran is a peace loving country, and is not an Existential Threat to America like President Trump is, she said.

Trump is an Imminent Threat to our Republic, and a Danger to our Constitution.

Islam "the religion of peace" is not a threat to our National Security, but The President is.

So today, in that same vein, Nancy Pelosi will again attempt to Abuse the Power of Congress and try to appropriate Power The Constitution has given The Executive Branch for herself in her effort to defend Iran, and attack America.

Pelosi effort to rein in Trump on Iran renews war powers debate

Pelosi said that a classified War Powers Act notification delivered to Congress last week "raises more questions than it answers" and prompted "serious and urgent questions about the timing, manner and justification of the Administration's decision to engage in hostilities against Iran – complaining that Congress and the American people "are being left in the dark about our national security."

"The Trump Administration's provocative, escalatory and disproportionate military engagement continues to put servicemembers, diplomats and citizens of America and our allies in danger," Pelosi, D-Calif., stated. "This initiation of hostilities was taken without an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iran, without the consultation of the Congress and without the articulation of a clear and legitimate strategy to either the Congress or the public."

Iran Nan is setting herself up for the biggest SOTU embarrassment ever

I'm pretty confident this is coming. And I personally think the real reason Pelosi is holding up the articles is because she does not want to be bitch slapped in The SOTU for conducting a SHAM Impeachment Inquiry, because The Senate even The Dems are pissed now for her not delivering The Articles.

She might drop them the morning of the SOTU

I've been consistent with those articles, they will never reach the senate floor. EVAH!

The would be shocking, but it would not actually surprise me.

she can't have an acquittal. Period. I'm not sure if she has Alzheimers or not, but I think she didn't think that all through until they voted.

 

[The Original Tree]

Iran Nan is setting herself up for the biggest SOTU embarrassment ever

I'm pretty confident this is coming. And I personally think the real reason Pelosi is holding up the articles is because she does not want to be bitch slapped in The SOTU for conducting a SHAM Impeachment Inquiry, because The Senate even The Dems are pissed now for her not delivering The Articles.

She might drop them the morning of the SOTU

I've been consistent with those articles, they will never reach the senate floor. EVAH!

The would be shocking, but it would not actually surprise me.

she can't have an acquittal. Period. I'm not sure if she has Alzheimers or not, but I think she didn't think that all through until they voted.

This is the kind of crap Pelosi bends over backwards to defend:

READ THIS TWICE:

Banks doubled down on his comments later Wednesday evening, posting a video that showed Omar and other Democrats giggling in the background as their colleague, U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, spoke to reporters about the more than 4,000 U.S. service members killed in Iraq over the years.


Omar claim of PTSD 'offensive' to US veterans, Indiana congressman says; Squad member responds

An Indiana congressman who served in Afghanistan as a member of the Navy Reserve spoke out on behalf of America's military veterans Wednesday after U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., claimed she suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder.

U.S. Rep. Jim Banks, a Republican, said Omar's comments were a "disgrace," calling the remarks "offensive to our nation's veterans who really do have PTSD after putting their life on the line to keep America safe.

Banks doubled down on his comments later Wednesday evening, posting a video that showed Omar and other Democrats giggling in the background as their colleague, U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, spoke to reporters about the more than 4,000 U.S. service members killed in Iraq over the years.

"Your words and actions at today’s press conference reveal your feelings toward our soldiers serving abroad and the video speaks for itself," Banks wrote, including a video of the news conference shared by Rep. Jody Hice, R-Ga.

 

[BlindBoo]

I sure would like to see some blue cities vaporized.

The true Trumpybear vision comes through. Trumpublicans want former Republicans to go to war with Democrats. No lie is stupid enough not to parrot as this thread shows.

Good job Comrades.

Putin Smiles.

no different than our congessman Swolwell. right? Accept he wanted all gun owners vaporized.

Just curious, did you post this same statement after that tweet? Or are you inconsistent and dishonest always?

Feel free to post the tweet when the Congressman said he wanted all gun owner vaporized.

"And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities."

Rep. Eric Swalwell on Twitter

Did Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell 'Suggest Nuking' Gun Owners Who Resist Confiscation?

Ludicrous hyperbole is a campaign tactic to capture moroonies.

 

[jc456]

I sure would like to see some blue cities vaporized.

The true Trumpybear vision comes through. Trumpublicans want former Republicans to go to war with Democrats. No lie is stupid enough not to parrot as this thread shows.

Good job Comrades.

Putin Smiles.

no different than our congessman Swolwell. right? Accept he wanted all gun owners vaporized.

Just curious, did you post this same statement after that tweet? Or are you inconsistent and dishonest always?

Feel free to post the tweet when the Congressman said he wanted all gun owner vaporized.

"And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities."

Rep. Eric Swalwell on Twitter

Did Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell 'Suggest Nuking' Gun Owners Who Resist Confiscation?

Ludicrous hyperbole is a campaign tactic to capture moroonies.

yep that one right there.

And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes.

thanks! So where was your post? If you don't think that was a threat, then you have no honest bone in your frame.