Pedophilia Deserves Civil Rights, Says New York Times’ Op-ed

[ChrisL]

Hmm, ok, will do this the old-fashioned way.

> ChrisL, one of many 'impartial' sources for information you exhibited an interest in.

Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation

FAQ-like presentation on homosexuality and how it relates to pedophilia and child sexual abuse.

Okay, but this one is biased in the OTHER direction. The author is the writer of a blog about homophobia.

I would like to see an impartial study that was performed by, say, a university, perhaps more than one study, and one that was peer reviewed.

Another thing about "studies" is that there are always other studies to contradict that study's findings. It gets confusing and it's important to know how they conducted study, what were the questions asked, how were the questions asked, the size of the sample, etc. ALL of those things are important to determine the efficacy of the study IMO, because anyone can find any "study" or "article" that agrees with them when it comes to something as complicated as CSA.

Not as thorough or to-point as the UC Davis one, a more specifcly addressing pedophilia one here,
Pessimism About Pedophilia - Harvard Health Publications

Trying to find a great forensic psychology one but to understand the challenge you'd have to see my bookmarks file(s) Am working on it.

DELTA - You are cherry picking your propaganda ---

The UC Davis[at Berkely - lol]is from an Academia Nut - it was written for one purpose and one purpose only - to create more static and cloud valid scientific data . I don't know about the other trash you cited - but if you cited it then I am assuming it is simply more LGBT propaganda.

College is frequently the initiating phase of Leftist indoctrination into the brave new worldview of progressive liberalism. Colleges and Universities under Big Brothers thumb require students to drop mental contraband like a hot potato. Mental contraband being surreptitiously defined as any thoughts or beliefs which contradict the official ideology. Religious views [Unless of course you are a member of a protected religion such as Islam] . Racial views, not part of the official ideology [Unless of course you are a minority racist such as Nation of Aztlan, or an opponent of the "blue eyed devils"]. Homophobic views, you are forbidden to speak out against the Gay Agenda under the penalty of Academic Death. Class warfare ideology is drilled into the minds of unsuspecting victims and the evils of capitalism and virtues of socialism are espoused.

Harvard , UC Berkely I spit on them - they are simply institutions of Higher Indoctrination - Not Learning ! So kindly take any of your Academia Nut BS and stick it where the sun don't shine [ yes - I know - you'll probably enjoy that]

Aww did Harvard and the UC schools laugh at you when you applied?

He is right. It is SO obvious to most people. They are TRYING to "normalize" homosexuality, and of course OTHERS are going to follow in their footsteps.

 

[ChrisL]

Did you know pedos have lower IQs by 10-15 points than the general population?

Interesting where did you read that ? ... Also.... that would add weight to the theory that a "certain poster" on this thread actually has a thing for kids ... hmmmmmmm

"Pedophiles appear to have significantly less white matter—a substance that connects different parts of the brain—than nonpedophiles, according to research conducted by James Cantor, an associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto."

"Cantor has said that a lack of connection between separate parts of the brain could mean that pedophiles have serious trouble differentiating between sexual objects. His research has also found that pedophiles generally have lower IQs than people with sexual interest in adults, and that pedophiles are also disproportionately left-handed compared to the overall population."

It's all about making it an illness, so people can't discriminate against them. That's what they did with homosexuality. Then they determined that it wasn't an illness, but an orientation.

Pedos are also somewhat shorter than normal.

Can Science Spot a Pedophile Research Zeroes In On Brain Abnormalities - The Daily Beast

WHY did they remove homosexuality from the DSM list of mental disorders then? Has anyone ever thought that perhaps some kind of cognitive deficit may be related to homosexuality and that it actually IS a kind of mental disorder?

WHY did they remove homosexuality from the DSM list of mental disorders then?

It was largely a political move based on minimal baseless and debunked scientific data .

The American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder after years of political pressure from gay activists and under the limited weight of tainted and poorly implemented studies. The American Psychiatrics association board of trustees passed this decision followed by a statement which listed among the reasons for their decision as changing social norms and growing gay rights activism . So basically, a scientific institution was coerced into changing a scientific opinion or classification due to political pressure and false evidence.

Pathology of Homosexuality

Although I don't have anything personal against homosexuals and I think that there are plenty of them who are decent people, I still don't feel that homosexuality is in any way a "normal" sexual orientation. Something somewhere is tweaked in those people. I don't think that actually being sexually attracted to your same sex is "normal."

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Hmm, ok, will do this the old-fashioned way.

> ChrisL, one of many 'impartial' sources for information you exhibited an interest in.

Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation

FAQ-like presentation on homosexuality and how it relates to pedophilia and child sexual abuse.

Okay, but this one is biased in the OTHER direction. The author is the writer of a blog about homophobia.

I would like to see an impartial study that was performed by, say, a university, perhaps more than one study, and one that was peer reviewed.

Another thing about "studies" is that there are always other studies to contradict that study's findings. It gets confusing and it's important to know how they conducted study, what were the questions asked, how were the questions asked, the size of the sample, etc. ALL of those things are important to determine the efficacy of the study IMO, because anyone can find any "study" or "article" that agrees with them when it comes to something as complicated as CSA.

Not as thorough or to-point as the UC Davis one, a more specifcly addressing pedophilia one here,
Pessimism About Pedophilia - Harvard Health Publications

Trying to find a great forensic psychology one but to understand the challenge you'd have to see my bookmarks file(s) Am working on it.

DELTA - You are cherry picking your propaganda ---

The UC Davis[at Berkely - lol]is from an Academia Nut - it was written for one purpose and one purpose only - to create more static and cloud valid scientific data . I don't know about the other trash you cited - but if you cited it then I am assuming it is simply more LGBT propaganda.

College is frequently the initiating phase of Leftist indoctrination into the brave new worldview of progressive liberalism. Colleges and Universities under Big Brothers thumb require students to drop mental contraband like a hot potato. Mental contraband being surreptitiously defined as any thoughts or beliefs which contradict the official ideology. Religious views [Unless of course you are a member of a protected religion such as Islam] . Racial views, not part of the official ideology [Unless of course you are a minority racist such as Nation of Aztlan, or an opponent of the "blue eyed devils"]. Homophobic views, you are forbidden to speak out against the Gay Agenda under the penalty of Academic Death. Class warfare ideology is drilled into the minds of unsuspecting victims and the evils of capitalism and virtues of socialism are espoused.

Harvard , UC Berkely I spit on them - they are simply institutions of Higher Indoctrination - Not Learning ! So kindly take any of your Academia Nut BS and stick it where the sun don't shine [ yes - I know - you'll probably enjoy that]

Aww did Harvard and the UC schools laugh at you when you applied?

He is right. It is SO obvious to most people. They are TRYING to "normalize" homosexuality, and of course OTHERS are going to follow in their footsteps.

Homosexuality was normalized over 3000 years ago when Torah forbade it.

 

[ChrisL]

Okay, but this one is biased in the OTHER direction. The author is the writer of a blog about homophobia.

I would like to see an impartial study that was performed by, say, a university, perhaps more than one study, and one that was peer reviewed.

Another thing about "studies" is that there are always other studies to contradict that study's findings. It gets confusing and it's important to know how they conducted study, what were the questions asked, how were the questions asked, the size of the sample, etc. ALL of those things are important to determine the efficacy of the study IMO, because anyone can find any "study" or "article" that agrees with them when it comes to something as complicated as CSA.

Not as thorough or to-point as the UC Davis one, a more specifcly addressing pedophilia one here,
Pessimism About Pedophilia - Harvard Health Publications

Trying to find a great forensic psychology one but to understand the challenge you'd have to see my bookmarks file(s) Am working on it.

DELTA - You are cherry picking your propaganda ---

The UC Davis[at Berkely - lol]is from an Academia Nut - it was written for one purpose and one purpose only - to create more static and cloud valid scientific data . I don't know about the other trash you cited - but if you cited it then I am assuming it is simply more LGBT propaganda.

College is frequently the initiating phase of Leftist indoctrination into the brave new worldview of progressive liberalism. Colleges and Universities under Big Brothers thumb require students to drop mental contraband like a hot potato. Mental contraband being surreptitiously defined as any thoughts or beliefs which contradict the official ideology. Religious views [Unless of course you are a member of a protected religion such as Islam] . Racial views, not part of the official ideology [Unless of course you are a minority racist such as Nation of Aztlan, or an opponent of the "blue eyed devils"]. Homophobic views, you are forbidden to speak out against the Gay Agenda under the penalty of Academic Death. Class warfare ideology is drilled into the minds of unsuspecting victims and the evils of capitalism and virtues of socialism are espoused.

Harvard , UC Berkely I spit on them - they are simply institutions of Higher Indoctrination - Not Learning ! So kindly take any of your Academia Nut BS and stick it where the sun don't shine [ yes - I know - you'll probably enjoy that]

Aww did Harvard and the UC schools laugh at you when you applied?

He is right. It is SO obvious to most people. They are TRYING to "normalize" homosexuality, and of course OTHERS are going to follow in their footsteps.

Homosexuality was normalized over 3000 years ago when Torah forbade it.

Sorry, but it is NOT normal. Lol! I think that is obvious that it has only been "normalized" so that you guys don't cry.

 

[ChrisL]

How can anyone think that man who wants to do another man in his bum is normal?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Did you know pedos have lower IQs by 10-15 points than the general population?

Interesting where did you read that ? ... Also.... that would add weight to the theory that a "certain poster" on this thread actually has a thing for kids ... hmmmmmmm

"Pedophiles appear to have significantly less white matter—a substance that connects different parts of the brain—than nonpedophiles, according to research conducted by James Cantor, an associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto."

"Cantor has said that a lack of connection between separate parts of the brain could mean that pedophiles have serious trouble differentiating between sexual objects. His research has also found that pedophiles generally have lower IQs than people with sexual interest in adults, and that pedophiles are also disproportionately left-handed compared to the overall population."

It's all about making it an illness, so people can't discriminate against them. That's what they did with homosexuality. Then they determined that it wasn't an illness, but an orientation.

Pedos are also somewhat shorter than normal.

Can Science Spot a Pedophile Research Zeroes In On Brain Abnormalities - The Daily Beast

WHY did they remove homosexuality from the DSM list of mental disorders then? Has anyone ever thought that perhaps some kind of cognitive deficit may be related to homosexuality and that it actually IS a kind of mental disorder?

WHY did they remove homosexuality from the DSM list of mental disorders then?

It was largely a political move based on minimal baseless and debunked scientific data .

The American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder after years of political pressure from gay activists and under the limited weight of tainted and poorly implemented studies. The American Psychiatrics association board of trustees passed this decision followed by a statement which listed among the reasons for their decision as changing social norms and growing gay rights activism . So basically, a scientific institution was coerced into changing a scientific opinion or classification due to political pressure and false evidence.

Pathology of Homosexuality

Although I don't have anything personal against homosexuals and I think that there are plenty of them who are decent people, I still don't feel that homosexuality is in any way a "normal" sexual orientation. Something somewhere is tweaked in those people. I don't think that actually being sexually attracted to your same sex is "normal."

Being different doesn't imply being flawed. We owe our very existence to the variety of human life and existence. Without variety we woulda died out long ago.

Always needs differences in groups. Especially opposing differences. Without it a group stagnates and dies. See differences among same-species all over the animal kingdom. An orca's an orca, but there are many different orca cultures. Some eat just fish, some have evolved a culture that eats sharks and rays, some eat warm-blooded mammals like seals and sea lions. Is any one of those good, and the others bad by virtue of simply being different?

Humans undoubtedly have the most variety of all the animals. It's why we're the top of the pyramid. Without these differences, we wouldn't exist. Americans didn't win the Space Race, Germans working for Americans did. Christians didn't invent the atomic bomb, Jews did.

And oh ya, without fags we would have lost World War 2 you ignorant piece of shit. Go google Alan Turing.

 

[ChrisL]

Also, what pisses me off, is that they don't even KNOW exactly what it is that causes a person to be a homosexual, so they are ONLY removing it from the list to make a certain segment of the population happy. It's really quite disgusting. It should remain on the DSM list of psychiatric diagnosis because, more than likely, it is a type of psychiatric abnormality or chemical imbalance.

Also, I know that there are a LOT of people out there who are acting as if they are "homosexuals" but it seems as if it is more of a "fad" than anything else. You can tell with the young boys who are looking more and more "feminine."

It's a like a huge social engineering experiment that is going to screw up the whole world!

Now, to all of you homosexuals, if you could be "cured" of your homosexuality, would you want that? Why or why not?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

How can anyone think that man who wants to do another man in his bum is normal?

Given how annoying women are can you blame us?

 

[ChrisL]

Interesting where did you read that ? ... Also.... that would add weight to the theory that a "certain poster" on this thread actually has a thing for kids ... hmmmmmmm

"Pedophiles appear to have significantly less white matter—a substance that connects different parts of the brain—than nonpedophiles, according to research conducted by James Cantor, an associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto."

"Cantor has said that a lack of connection between separate parts of the brain could mean that pedophiles have serious trouble differentiating between sexual objects. His research has also found that pedophiles generally have lower IQs than people with sexual interest in adults, and that pedophiles are also disproportionately left-handed compared to the overall population."

It's all about making it an illness, so people can't discriminate against them. That's what they did with homosexuality. Then they determined that it wasn't an illness, but an orientation.

Pedos are also somewhat shorter than normal.

Can Science Spot a Pedophile Research Zeroes In On Brain Abnormalities - The Daily Beast

WHY did they remove homosexuality from the DSM list of mental disorders then? Has anyone ever thought that perhaps some kind of cognitive deficit may be related to homosexuality and that it actually IS a kind of mental disorder?

WHY did they remove homosexuality from the DSM list of mental disorders then?

It was largely a political move based on minimal baseless and debunked scientific data .

The American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder after years of political pressure from gay activists and under the limited weight of tainted and poorly implemented studies. The American Psychiatrics association board of trustees passed this decision followed by a statement which listed among the reasons for their decision as changing social norms and growing gay rights activism . So basically, a scientific institution was coerced into changing a scientific opinion or classification due to political pressure and false evidence.

Pathology of Homosexuality

Although I don't have anything personal against homosexuals and I think that there are plenty of them who are decent people, I still don't feel that homosexuality is in any way a "normal" sexual orientation. Something somewhere is tweaked in those people. I don't think that actually being sexually attracted to your same sex is "normal."

Being different doesn't imply being flawed. We owe our very existence to the variety of human life and existence. Without variety we woulda died out long ago.

Always needs differences in groups. Especially opposing differences. Without it a group stagnates and dies. See differences among same-species all over the animal kingdom. An orca's an orca, but there are many different orca cultures. Some eat just fish, some have evolved a culture that eats sharks and rays, some eat warm-blooded mammals like seals and sea lions. Is any one of those good, and the others bad by virtue of simply being different?

Humans undoubtedly have the most variety of all the animals. It's why we're the top of the pyramid. Without these differences, we wouldn't exist. Americans didn't win the Space Race, Germans working for Americans did. Christians didn't invent the atomic bomb, Jews did.

And oh ya, without fags we would have lost World War 2 you ignorant piece of shit. Go google Alan Turing.

Like I said, I don't have anything against homosexuals, but I refuse to accept that it is a "normal variant." I really think there is something that is "off" and that goes especially for the transgendered people. Something is just not quite right there. For our psychiatrists to fall in line for the political correctness when they don't even KNOW, is pretty sickening.

 

[ChrisL]

How can anyone think that man who wants to do another man in his bum is normal?

Given how annoying women are can you blame us?

Men are annoying too. Believe it. Lol!

 

[GreenBean]

Interesting where did you read that ? ... Also.... that would add weight to the theory that a "certain poster" on this thread actually has a thing for kids ... hmmmmmmm

"Pedophiles appear to have significantly less white matter—a substance that connects different parts of the brain—than nonpedophiles, according to research conducted by James Cantor, an associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto."

"Cantor has said that a lack of connection between separate parts of the brain could mean that pedophiles have serious trouble differentiating between sexual objects. His research has also found that pedophiles generally have lower IQs than people with sexual interest in adults, and that pedophiles are also disproportionately left-handed compared to the overall population."

It's all about making it an illness, so people can't discriminate against them. That's what they did with homosexuality. Then they determined that it wasn't an illness, but an orientation.

Pedos are also somewhat shorter than normal.

Can Science Spot a Pedophile Research Zeroes In On Brain Abnormalities - The Daily Beast

WHY did they remove homosexuality from the DSM list of mental disorders then? Has anyone ever thought that perhaps some kind of cognitive deficit may be related to homosexuality and that it actually IS a kind of mental disorder?

WHY did they remove homosexuality from the DSM list of mental disorders then?

It was largely a political move based on minimal baseless and debunked scientific data .

The American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder after years of political pressure from gay activists and under the limited weight of tainted and poorly implemented studies. The American Psychiatrics association board of trustees passed this decision followed by a statement which listed among the reasons for their decision as changing social norms and growing gay rights activism . So basically, a scientific institution was coerced into changing a scientific opinion or classification due to political pressure and false evidence.

Pathology of Homosexuality

Although I don't have anything personal against homosexuals and I think that there are plenty of them who are decent people, I still don't feel that homosexuality is in any way a "normal" sexual orientation. Something somewhere is tweaked in those people. I don't think that actually being sexually attracted to your same sex is "normal."

Being different doesn't imply being flawed. We owe our very existence to the variety of human life and existence. Without variety we woulda died out long ago.

Always needs differences in groups. Especially opposing differences. Without it a group stagnates and dies. See differences among same-species all over the animal kingdom. An orca's an orca, but there are many different orca cultures. Some eat just fish, some have evolved a culture that eats sharks and rays, some eat warm-blooded mammals like seals and sea lions. Is any one of those good, and the others bad by virtue of simply being different?

Humans undoubtedly have the most variety of all the animals. It's why we're the top of the pyramid. Without these differences, we wouldn't exist. Americans didn't win the Space Race, Germans working for Americans did. Christians didn't invent the atomic bomb, Jews did.

And oh ya, without fags we would have lost World War 2 you ignorant piece of shit. Go google Alan Turing.

Re: Alan Turing.
There's a difference between a respectable Gay and a Faggot - If you are speaking of the English Mathematician - he was a respectable Gay Man - who I believe broke some German ciphers . Hardly the cause for winning the entire War. He was a respectable Homosexual - you sir are a cum guzzling turd burglar - a faggot . BIG DIFFERENCE

 

[Delta4Embassy]

"Pedophiles appear to have significantly less white matter—a substance that connects different parts of the brain—than nonpedophiles, according to research conducted by James Cantor, an associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto."

"Cantor has said that a lack of connection between separate parts of the brain could mean that pedophiles have serious trouble differentiating between sexual objects. His research has also found that pedophiles generally have lower IQs than people with sexual interest in adults, and that pedophiles are also disproportionately left-handed compared to the overall population."

It's all about making it an illness, so people can't discriminate against them. That's what they did with homosexuality. Then they determined that it wasn't an illness, but an orientation.

Pedos are also somewhat shorter than normal.

Can Science Spot a Pedophile Research Zeroes In On Brain Abnormalities - The Daily Beast

WHY did they remove homosexuality from the DSM list of mental disorders then? Has anyone ever thought that perhaps some kind of cognitive deficit may be related to homosexuality and that it actually IS a kind of mental disorder?

WHY did they remove homosexuality from the DSM list of mental disorders then?

It was largely a political move based on minimal baseless and debunked scientific data .

The American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder after years of political pressure from gay activists and under the limited weight of tainted and poorly implemented studies. The American Psychiatrics association board of trustees passed this decision followed by a statement which listed among the reasons for their decision as changing social norms and growing gay rights activism . So basically, a scientific institution was coerced into changing a scientific opinion or classification due to political pressure and false evidence.

Pathology of Homosexuality

Although I don't have anything personal against homosexuals and I think that there are plenty of them who are decent people, I still don't feel that homosexuality is in any way a "normal" sexual orientation. Something somewhere is tweaked in those people. I don't think that actually being sexually attracted to your same sex is "normal."

Being different doesn't imply being flawed. We owe our very existence to the variety of human life and existence. Without variety we woulda died out long ago.

Always needs differences in groups. Especially opposing differences. Without it a group stagnates and dies. See differences among same-species all over the animal kingdom. An orca's an orca, but there are many different orca cultures. Some eat just fish, some have evolved a culture that eats sharks and rays, some eat warm-blooded mammals like seals and sea lions. Is any one of those good, and the others bad by virtue of simply being different?

Humans undoubtedly have the most variety of all the animals. It's why we're the top of the pyramid. Without these differences, we wouldn't exist. Americans didn't win the Space Race, Germans working for Americans did. Christians didn't invent the atomic bomb, Jews did.

And oh ya, without fags we would have lost World War 2 you ignorant piece of shit. Go google Alan Turing.

Re: Alan Turing.
There's a difference between a respectable Gay and a Faggot - If you are speaking of the English Mathematician - he was a respectable Gay Man - who I believe broke some German ciphers . Hardly the cause for winning the entire War. He was a respectable Homosexual - you sir are a cum guzzling turd burglar - a faggot . BIG DIFFERENCE

"Winston Churchill said that Turing made the single biggest contribution to Allied victory in the war against Nazi Germany.[6] Turing's pivotal role in cracking intercepted coded messages enabled the Allies to defeat the Nazis in several crucial battles."

 

[ChrisL]

"Pedophiles appear to have significantly less white matter—a substance that connects different parts of the brain—than nonpedophiles, according to research conducted by James Cantor, an associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto."

"Cantor has said that a lack of connection between separate parts of the brain could mean that pedophiles have serious trouble differentiating between sexual objects. His research has also found that pedophiles generally have lower IQs than people with sexual interest in adults, and that pedophiles are also disproportionately left-handed compared to the overall population."

It's all about making it an illness, so people can't discriminate against them. That's what they did with homosexuality. Then they determined that it wasn't an illness, but an orientation.

Pedos are also somewhat shorter than normal.

Can Science Spot a Pedophile Research Zeroes In On Brain Abnormalities - The Daily Beast

WHY did they remove homosexuality from the DSM list of mental disorders then? Has anyone ever thought that perhaps some kind of cognitive deficit may be related to homosexuality and that it actually IS a kind of mental disorder?

WHY did they remove homosexuality from the DSM list of mental disorders then?

It was largely a political move based on minimal baseless and debunked scientific data .

The American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder after years of political pressure from gay activists and under the limited weight of tainted and poorly implemented studies. The American Psychiatrics association board of trustees passed this decision followed by a statement which listed among the reasons for their decision as changing social norms and growing gay rights activism . So basically, a scientific institution was coerced into changing a scientific opinion or classification due to political pressure and false evidence.

Pathology of Homosexuality

Although I don't have anything personal against homosexuals and I think that there are plenty of them who are decent people, I still don't feel that homosexuality is in any way a "normal" sexual orientation. Something somewhere is tweaked in those people. I don't think that actually being sexually attracted to your same sex is "normal."

Being different doesn't imply being flawed. We owe our very existence to the variety of human life and existence. Without variety we woulda died out long ago.

Always needs differences in groups. Especially opposing differences. Without it a group stagnates and dies. See differences among same-species all over the animal kingdom. An orca's an orca, but there are many different orca cultures. Some eat just fish, some have evolved a culture that eats sharks and rays, some eat warm-blooded mammals like seals and sea lions. Is any one of those good, and the others bad by virtue of simply being different?

Humans undoubtedly have the most variety of all the animals. It's why we're the top of the pyramid. Without these differences, we wouldn't exist. Americans didn't win the Space Race, Germans working for Americans did. Christians didn't invent the atomic bomb, Jews did.

And oh ya, without fags we would have lost World War 2 you ignorant piece of shit. Go google Alan Turing.

Re: Alan Turing.
There's a difference between a respectable Gay and a Faggot - If you are speaking of the English Mathematician - he was a respectable Gay Man - who I believe broke some German ciphers . Hardly the cause for winning the entire War. He was a respectable Homosexual - you sir are a cum guzzling turd burglar - a faggot . BIG DIFFERENCE

Not to mention, just because someone is intelligent does not mean he is not "tweaked" somewhere when it comes to his/her sexuality. It doesn't have to be as obvious as being a drooling retard.

 

[Silhouette]

Being different doesn't imply being flawed. We owe our very existence to the variety of human life and existence. Without variety we woulda died out long ago.

Always needs differences in groups. Especially opposing differences. Without it a group stagnates and dies. See differences among same-species all over the animal kingdom. An orca's an orca, but there are many different orca cultures. Some eat just fish, some have evolved a culture that eats sharks and rays, some eat warm-blooded mammals like seals and sea lions. Is any one of those good, and the others bad by virtue of simply being different?

Humans undoubtedly have the most variety of all the animals. It's why we're the top of the pyramid. Without these differences, we wouldn't exist. Americans didn't win the Space Race, Germans working for Americans did. Christians didn't invent the atomic bomb, Jews did.

And oh ya, without fags we would have lost World War 2 you ignorant piece of shit. Go google Alan Turing.

As it happens, being "different" may make you die out. Having sex with the lower digestive tract is a difference that is deadly. The colon resorbs fluids and pathogens like the HIV virus right into the bloodstream. The lower digestive tract was not meant to be an artificial vagina. Why are you seeking an artificial vagina anyway? It could be argued that "gay men" are really closeted heteros..

There are some "differences" born of mental issues. And those are differences we can live without. I'ts going to happen...differences...but some you don't mainstream as a social value. Some you just don't.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Being different doesn't imply being flawed. We owe our very existence to the variety of human life and existence. Without variety we woulda died out long ago.

Always needs differences in groups. Especially opposing differences. Without it a group stagnates and dies. See differences among same-species all over the animal kingdom. An orca's an orca, but there are many different orca cultures. Some eat just fish, some have evolved a culture that eats sharks and rays, some eat warm-blooded mammals like seals and sea lions. Is any one of those good, and the others bad by virtue of simply being different?

Humans undoubtedly have the most variety of all the animals. It's why we're the top of the pyramid. Without these differences, we wouldn't exist. Americans didn't win the Space Race, Germans working for Americans did. Christians didn't invent the atomic bomb, Jews did.

And oh ya, without fags we would have lost World War 2 you ignorant piece of shit. Go google Alan Turing.

As it happens, being "different" may make you die out. Having sex with the lower digestive tract is a difference that is deadly. The colon resorbs fluids and pathogens like the HIV virus right into the bloodstream. The lower digestive tract was not meant to be an artificial vagina. Why are you seeking an artificial vagina anyway? It could be argued that "gay men" are really closeted heteros..

There are some "differences" born of mental issues. And those are differences we can live without. I'ts going to happen...differences...but some you don't mainstream as a social value. Some you just don't.

So all the heterosexuals who get an STI from heterosexual sex are what? Flukes? Can make a case all sex is risky behaviour. Been STI known about and guarded against since at least ancient Rome. But trying to asseert anal intercourse among gay men is inherently unhealthy or otherwise something that justifies condemning homosexuality is to ignore the majority of heterosexuals who enjoy it. To say nothing of heterosexual men who enjoy some anal penetration.

Everyone has an anus. And everyone's anus is extremely sensitive. Enjoying sexual gratification through stimulation of the anus is just as normal and mainstream as enjoying oral copulation. But since most heterosexuals enjoy oral and some (fewer) enjoy anal, since that's all gay men CAN do it's more than alittle hypocritical to try and condemn homosexuals for doing what heterosexuals do.

 

[ChrisL]

Being different doesn't imply being flawed. We owe our very existence to the variety of human life and existence. Without variety we woulda died out long ago.

Always needs differences in groups. Especially opposing differences. Without it a group stagnates and dies. See differences among same-species all over the animal kingdom. An orca's an orca, but there are many different orca cultures. Some eat just fish, some have evolved a culture that eats sharks and rays, some eat warm-blooded mammals like seals and sea lions. Is any one of those good, and the others bad by virtue of simply being different?

Humans undoubtedly have the most variety of all the animals. It's why we're the top of the pyramid. Without these differences, we wouldn't exist. Americans didn't win the Space Race, Germans working for Americans did. Christians didn't invent the atomic bomb, Jews did.

And oh ya, without fags we would have lost World War 2 you ignorant piece of shit. Go google Alan Turing.

As it happens, being "different" may make you die out. Having sex with the lower digestive tract is a difference that is deadly. The colon resorbs fluids and pathogens like the HIV virus right into the bloodstream. The lower digestive tract was not meant to be an artificial vagina. Why are you seeking an artificial vagina anyway? It could be argued that "gay men" are really closeted heteros..

There are some "differences" born of mental issues. And those are differences we can live without. I'ts going to happen...differences...but some you don't mainstream as a social value. Some you just don't.

So all the heterosexuals who get an STI from heterosexual sex are what? Flukes? Can make a case all sex is risky behaviour. Been STI known about and guarded against since at least ancient Rome. But trying to asseert anal intercourse among gay men is inherently unhealthy or otherwise something that justifies condemning homosexuality is to ignore the majority of heterosexuals who enjoy it. To say nothing of heterosexual men who enjoy some anal penetration.

Everyone has an anus. And everyone's anus is extremely sensitive. Enjoying sexual gratification through stimulation of the anus is just as normal and mainstream as enjoying oral copulation. But since most heterosexuals enjoy oral and some (fewer) enjoy anal, since that's all gay men CAN do it's more than alittle hypocritical to try and condemn homosexuals for doing what heterosexuals do.

Actually, anal sex CAN damage your bum, and it's much more likely to occur than with vaginal sex.

Anal Sex Safety and Health Concerns

Is Anal Sex Safe?
There are a number of health risks with anal sex, and anal intercourse is the riskiest form of sexual activity for several reasons, including the following:

• The anus lacks the natural lubrication the vagina has. Penetration can tear the tissue inside the anus, allowing bacteria and viruses to enter the bloodstream. This can result in the spread of sexually transmitted infections including HIV. Studies have suggested that anal exposure to HIV poses 30 times more risk for the receptive partner than vaginal exposure. Exposure to the human papillomavirus (HPV) may also lead to the development of anal warts and anal cancer. Using lubricants can help some, but doesn't completely prevent tearing.
• The tissue inside the anus is not as well protected as the skinoutside the anus. Our external tissue has layers of dead cells that serve as a protective barrier against infection. The tissue inside the anus does not have this natural protection, which leaves it vulnerable to tearing and the spread of infection.
• The anus was designed to hold in feces. The anus is surrounded with a ring-like muscle, called the anal sphincter, which tightens after we defecate. When the muscle is tight, anal penetration can be painful and difficult. Repetitive anal sex may lead to weakening of the anal sphincter, making it difficult to hold in feces until you can get to the toilet. However, Kegel exercises to strengthen the sphincter may help prevent this problem or correct it.
• The anus is full of bacteria. Even if both partners do not have a sexually-transmitted infection or disease, bacteria normally in the anus can potentially infect the giving partner. Practicing vaginal sex after anal sex can also lead to vaginal and urinary tract infections.

Anal sex can carry other risks as well. Oral contact with the anus can put both partners at risk for hepatitis, herpes, HPV, and other infections. For heterosexual couples, pregnancy can occur if semen is deposited near the opening to the vagina.

Even though serious injury from anal sex is not common, it can occur. Bleeding after anal sex could be due to a hemorrhoid or tear, or something more serious such as a perforation (hole) in the colon. This is a dangerous problem that requires immediate medical attention. Treatment involves a hospital stay, surgery, and antibiotics to prevent infection.

 

[GreenBean]

Being different doesn't imply being flawed. We owe our very existence to the variety of human life and existence. Without variety we woulda died out long ago.

Always needs differences in groups. Especially opposing differences. Without it a group stagnates and dies. See differences among same-species all over the animal kingdom. An orca's an orca, but there are many different orca cultures. Some eat just fish, some have evolved a culture that eats sharks and rays, some eat warm-blooded mammals like seals and sea lions. Is any one of those good, and the others bad by virtue of simply being different?

Humans undoubtedly have the most variety of all the animals. It's why we're the top of the pyramid. Without these differences, we wouldn't exist. Americans didn't win the Space Race, Germans working for Americans did. Christians didn't invent the atomic bomb, Jews did.

And oh ya, without fags we would have lost World War 2 you ignorant piece of shit. Go google Alan Turing.

As it happens, being "different" may make you die out. Having sex with the lower digestive tract is a difference that is deadly. The colon resorbs fluids and pathogens like the HIV virus right into the bloodstream. The lower digestive tract was not meant to be an artificial vagina. Why are you seeking an artificial vagina anyway? It could be argued that "gay men" are really closeted heteros..

There are some "differences" born of mental issues. And those are differences we can live without. I'ts going to happen...differences...but some you don't mainstream as a social value. Some you just don't.

BRILLIANT !!!

Why are you seeking an artificial vagina anyway? It could be argued that "gay men" are really closeted heteros..

There are some "differences" born of mental issues. And those are differences we can live without. I'ts going to happen...differences...but some you don't mainstream as a social value. Some you just don't.

I hope you don't mind - but I may be borrowing that in the future .

 

[GreenBean]

Being different doesn't imply being flawed. We owe our very existence to the variety of human life and existence. Without variety we woulda died out long ago.

Always needs differences in groups. Especially opposing differences. Without it a group stagnates and dies. See differences among same-species all over the animal kingdom. An orca's an orca, but there are many different orca cultures. Some eat just fish, some have evolved a culture that eats sharks and rays, some eat warm-blooded mammals like seals and sea lions. Is any one of those good, and the others bad by virtue of simply being different?

Humans undoubtedly have the most variety of all the animals. It's why we're the top of the pyramid. Without these differences, we wouldn't exist. Americans didn't win the Space Race, Germans working for Americans did. Christians didn't invent the atomic bomb, Jews did.

And oh ya, without fags we would have lost World War 2 you ignorant piece of shit. Go google Alan Turing.

As it happens, being "different" may make you die out. Having sex with the lower digestive tract is a difference that is deadly. The colon resorbs fluids and pathogens like the HIV virus right into the bloodstream. The lower digestive tract was not meant to be an artificial vagina. Why are you seeking an artificial vagina anyway? It could be argued that "gay men" are really closeted heteros..

There are some "differences" born of mental issues. And those are differences we can live without. I'ts going to happen...differences...but some you don't mainstream as a social value. Some you just don't.

So all the heterosexuals who get an STI from heterosexual sex are what? Flukes? Can make a case all sex is risky behaviour. Been STI known about and guarded against since at least ancient Rome. But trying to asseert anal intercourse among gay men is inherently unhealthy or otherwise something that justifies condemning homosexuality is to ignore the majority of heterosexuals who enjoy it. To say nothing of heterosexual men who enjoy some anal penetration.

Everyone has an anus. And everyone's anus is extremely sensitive. Enjoying sexual gratification through stimulation of the anus is just as normal and mainstream as enjoying oral copulation. But since most heterosexuals enjoy oral and some (fewer) enjoy anal, since that's all gay men CAN do it's more than alittle hypocritical to try and condemn homosexuals for doing what heterosexuals do.

STDs among heterosexuals are not near as prolific as among Gays .

The data indicate that rates of HIV infection among gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM) are more than 44 times higher than rates among heterosexual men and more than 40 times higher than women. Rates of syphilis, an STD that can facilitate HIV infection and, if left untreated, may lead to sight loss and severe damage to the nervous system, are reported to be more than 46 times higher among gay men and other MSM than among heterosexual men and more than 71 times higher than among women. (Full presser here).
Read more at U.S. Gay Men s Astonishing HIV STD Rates The Bilerico Project

That doesn't even touch on some of the lesser known maladies - such as shigelosis - which is extremely high in the Gay Community . Shigelosis comes from ingesting human feces - which is common among Gay men - after they take up the poop shoot they lick it off - hows that for healthy ???

 

[Silhouette]

So all the heterosexuals who get an STI from heterosexual sex are what? Flukes? Can make a case all sex is risky behaviour. Been STI known about and guarded against since at least ancient Rome. But trying to asseert anal intercourse among gay men is inherently unhealthy or otherwise something that justifies condemning homosexuality is to ignore the majority of heterosexuals who enjoy it. To say nothing of heterosexual men who enjoy some anal penetration.

Everyone has an anus. And everyone's anus is extremely sensitive. Enjoying sexual gratification through stimulation of the anus is just as normal and mainstream as enjoying oral copulation. But since most heterosexuals enjoy oral and some (fewer) enjoy anal, since that's all gay men CAN do it's more than alittle hypocritical to try and condemn homosexuals for doing what heterosexuals do.

Look, if you want to express your latent heterosexuality by using another dude's anus as your artificial vagina, that's your business. Just don't try to pass it off as a "normal difference in homo sapiens". The anus and colon are part of the human DIGESTIVE system. Therefore, they evolved in ways that make their use as a "sexual organ" very deadly dangerous. One of the ways your artificial vagina can kill you is that the colon evolved to resorb fluids and larger dissolved solids like vitamins in times of famine or lack of water. The colon doesn't know the difference between vitamins and the HIV virus. It throws out a welcome mat directly to the bloodstream for either one. A regular vagina has some protective features. It did evolve for the use of sex where STDS are common. It has certain ph features and flushing which attempt to keep STDs at a minimum. The artificial vagina [for you closeted heteros out there] does not have such features. As such, it is the type of "sex" that comes with the highest level of STD transmission per incident.

 

[ChrisL]

So all the heterosexuals who get an STI from heterosexual sex are what? Flukes? Can make a case all sex is risky behaviour. Been STI known about and guarded against since at least ancient Rome. But trying to asseert anal intercourse among gay men is inherently unhealthy or otherwise something that justifies condemning homosexuality is to ignore the majority of heterosexuals who enjoy it. To say nothing of heterosexual men who enjoy some anal penetration.

Everyone has an anus. And everyone's anus is extremely sensitive. Enjoying sexual gratification through stimulation of the anus is just as normal and mainstream as enjoying oral copulation. But since most heterosexuals enjoy oral and some (fewer) enjoy anal, since that's all gay men CAN do it's more than alittle hypocritical to try and condemn homosexuals for doing what heterosexuals do.

Look, if you want to express your latent heterosexuality by using another dude's anus as your artificial vagina, that's your business. Just don't try to pass it off as a "normal difference in homo sapiens". The anus and colon are part of the human DIGESTIVE system. Therefore, they evolved in ways that make their use as a "sexual organ" very deadly dangerous. One of the ways your artificial vagina can kill you is that the colon evolved to resorb fluids and larger dissolved solids like vitamins in times of famine or lack of water. The colon doesn't know the difference between vitamins and the HIV virus. It throws out a welcome mat directly to the bloodstream for either one. A regular vagina has some protective features. It did evolve for the use of sex where STDS are common. It has certain ph features and flushing which attempt to keep STDs at a minimum. The artificial vagina [for you closeted heteros out there] does not have such features. As such, it is the type of "sex" that comes with the highest level of STD transmission per incident.

Yes, I've read that before as well. It is MUCH easier to transmit STDs through the anus.