In 2006-2007, the UN condemned Israel 22 times, while authoring ZERO resolutions on the genocide in Darfur.
The UN's Human Rights Commission has only one permanent agenda item, and it targets Israel.
In September 2011, the UN hosted a World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa, which became little more than a platform for anti-Semitic speeches against Israel.
In 2009, the UN sponsored Goldstone report made accusations that were so unfounded, that Goldstone himself was forced to retract them two years later.
The UN continues to use Richard Falk as a Special Rapporteur, despite his repeated expressions of anti-Semitic beliefs.
Etc., etc., etc....
And people wonder why we discount "reports" from the UN.
Actually, Goldstone retracted only one of his accusations I believe, the claim that Israel deliberately targeted civilians and noted that had Israel been more forth coming with information, the report would have been different.
I find this amusing.
Being anti child abuse, in the opinion of the Zionist element, is being anti Jewish.
I highlighted the crimes of the Israel government; not Jews in general.
The bold is a very disingenuous 'statement'. The phrase 'the Zionist element' is obviously intended to be derogatory, and to claim 'Zionism' is inherently negative or 'anti-' ANYONE is abusive and obnoxious. Why do I say that? Because the 'Zionism' which millions - the vast majority - of mainstream Jews espouse has NO element of attacking or oppressing ANYONE else.
So, yes - all those insisting that 'Zionism' is automatically 'xenophobic' or something worse, are holding up a historically inaccurate and ultra-extremist version of it, and insisting that is the mainstream normative belief and practice.
And that is the very picture of the exact same blatant bias as when someone claims "All Muslims support Al-Quaeda" or some such slime.
The crimes of the Israeli government - and there ARE such crimes! - do not stem from 'Zionism' per se. They stem from the fact that there are imperfect humans in charge who are subject to any number of pressures.....just like the rest of humanity.
Oh, and the implication of the 'disingenuous' sentence in bold above is exactly that 'Zionism approves of child abuse' - which is another form of attack.
At least that is how I see it.