- Thread starter
- #81
Honestly, I feel like I'm insulting the animal kingdom everytime I compare Islamic terrorists to them. However it is a term that is used, even by national leaders usually after an act of Muslim terror (most recently Paris and Brussels) to describe their depravity and total lack of regard for innocent life. Sub-humanoids perhaps?This is what Muslim animals do, they murder innocents in cold blood, and then lie, justify and blame others.Oh, please do pardon the Jews for their overly cautious ways.
I would imagine 90 years of hatred and intolerance and violent attacks upon them by Arabs and other unjustified Muslims would be enough to think the next time you hear a loud boom in a crowded part of the city you might jump to conclusions that it is another terror attack.
And so if it turns out they were wrong about their assumption once every 50 times --- you are going to be critical of their behavior?
The European Jews began their attacks on the Muslims and Christians of what is now Palestine in the late 1800s ending with the eviction of most of them and the killing of thousands of other Muslims and Christians. Should the Jew murder, hatred and intolerance of the Christians and Muslims of Palestine be ignored?
No whining when Israel levels a few blocks in Gaza shithole or West Bank. Israel knows how to deal with these savages.
You aren't being fair, here, Roudy.
Animals do not kill because they are psychopathic murders following the doctrine of a rapist, thief and pedophile.
You need to step away from your computer, calm down, head outside for some fresh air and start finding some animals so you can apologize.
That's true. Animals HAVE to kill to eat. Saying "animals" is just a figure of speech.
Believe it or not, Arabs and Muslims use it the most when they want to really insult someone. And calling someone a dog is almost the same as calling them a pig, since Islam hates dogs, and dogs are usually abused and tortured as a hobby in Muslim countries.